Here is Michael Massing's latest on the media's culpability for the current mess in Iraq, entitled Unfit to Print
Why "unfit to print" you ask? This tidbit may answer the question:
A survey of the [NY Times]'s recent coverage of Iraq suggests that something deeper is at work. For months, the Times has seemed slow to recognize important news developments out of Iraq and to give them the attention they deserve. Aside from the Abu Ghraib scandal, which has lately taken over the Times's coverage, the paper has seemed intent on keeping bad news off the front page, especially when it reflects poorly on the Bush administration....
Massing takes on how the U.S. media has adopted an "embedded" mindset despite the availability of news resources readily available from Europe and the Arab world.
In the current climate, of course, any use of Arab or European material —no matter how thoroughly edited and checked—could elicit charges of liberalism and anti-Americanism. The question for American journalists is whether they really want to know what the Iraqis themselves, in all their complexity, are thinking and feeling.
What do you think the answer is?
After all, this is not your grandfather's journalists, these are the celebrity journalists of today who get to hobnob with the pretty and powerful.
8:57:32 PM
|