| September 2003 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||
| Aug Oct | ||||||
Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam
Because I've been trolled lately by a spammer who stole my business domain name for nefarious deeds, I'm interested in various spam control attempts. California bans all spam e-mail. California took a tough stand against spam e-mail on Wednesday after Governor Gray Davis signed a law prohibiting anyone from sending unsolicited commercial e-mail advertisements to a California e-mail address. [InfoWorld: Top News]
Texas style. It better have ADV in the subject line. Call the attorney general at (800) 621-0508 if it doesn't.
In Britain, Spammers Will Pay. Instead of the latest U.S. tactic in the spam war -- paying spammers not to spam-- Britain looks at the flip side the coin. A new law makes spamming a criminal act worthy of jury trials and the potential for unlimited fines. [Wired News] They wimped out. Originially they were going to send the scurvy scum to jail.
You've heard of whitelist (where you specify who can send mail to you--and send a challenge to unknown sender) and blacklist (where you ban certain senders--and never keep up with the ever-changing spammer names). Now there's the graylist, which does a temporary bounce if headers are suspect in one of three ways. Spammers generally don't try again, but well-behaved ISPs do. So your mail may be delayed, but it will get through.
And, finally, because it does you good to laugh. I don't think this applies to me...
5:33:45 PM
comment []