Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays. In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.
"Visual
thinking means taking innate advantage of our ability to see, with our
eyes and our mind's eye, in order to discover ideas, develop those
ideas quickly and intuitively, and share those ideas with others in a
way that they simply 'get'" This book is a brilliant elaboration on
Bill Buxton's idea of sketching, with a catch.
The brilliance is in the simplicity and elegance of the model:
people
understand things better, and find them accessible, when they're
sketched, competently and articulately, one step at a time, by hand
collect everything you can look at that's relevant, lay it all out, organize and orient it, and then do triage on it
define the problem using the 6 questions in the chart above, and illustrate it with the 6 corresponding types of graphic
explore
the 5 dimensions of ways of looking at the problem: simple/elaborate,
quality/quantity, vision/execution, individual/comparison, and
change/as-is
when presenting the results of your
problem-solving, start looking aloud, keep seeing aloud, continue by
imagining aloud, and close by showing aloud (i.e. recreate the process
you used to solve the problem) and then ask the audience if they agree
with what you've shown (show, don't tell, and this question answers
itself)
this works best for complex problems
all good pictures do not need to be self-explanatory, but do need to be explainable
This
may seem a bit cryptic, but a single read through the book and this is
all you need to use this powerful technique for both solving (or at
least coming to grips with) problems, and getting buy-in for your
solution.
The catch? The drawings in the book are simple but beautiful. Doing this well takes lots of practice,
both in conveying your meaning graphically (the expressions on your
stick men, and their poses, are critical to the audience's appreciation
and understanding), and in using this technique to solve seemingly
intractable problems. I intend to try it, but I'm so poor at drawing
that it will take me a long time to get my sketches right. Fortunately,
I'm really good at imagining possibilities, so my only problem with the
technique will be my artwork. Really recommended. Landscape & Memory, by Simon Schama
This
hugely ambitious work was recommended to me by three friends. The notes
and bibliography of this book alone are longer than some books I've
read. Schama attempts to show, through a rigorous and detailed study of
history and human behaviour, that we are all innately naturalists, that
our bond with Gaia has always been powerful and that our sense of
'apartness' from nature is illusory. He says, at the outset:
If the entire history of landscape in the West
is indeed just a mindless race toward a machine-driven universe,
uncomplicated by myth, metaphor and allegory, where measurement not
memory is the absolute arbiter of value, where our ingenuity is our
tragedy, then we are indeed trapped in the engine of our
self-destruction. At the heart of this book is the stubborn belief that
this is not, in fact, the whole story.
Many of the stories he tells are rooted in his own ancestors'
stories, and the book is intensely personal. He takes us through
millennia of passion for nature and place, and our apparent fear and
loathing of it. But right up to modern times this ambivalent
relationship and "being-a-part ness" still resonates, he says:
The designation of the suburban yard as the cure for the
afflictions of city life marks the greensward as a remnant of the old
pastoral dream, even though its goatherds and threshers have been
replaced by tanks of pesticide and industrial strength mowing
machines.
I
was not impressed by his arguments, which seem somewhat nostalgic to
me, in this age of relentless and ruthless ecocide. But he is an
amazing story-teller, and teller of the stories and lessons of history,
and the book is compelling even when it is not persuasive.
Even
more compelling are the stunning artworks which run through the whole
book, such as the one above, that argue much more powerfully than words
the inseparability of human spirituality from our love of and roots in
nature. The book is an armchair visit to a vast science and history
museum, and its stories of human altruism, savagery and struggle to
live within and without nature, rootless and yet inexorably drawn to
place, to home, stay with you a long time.
What
is most remarkable about this exhaustive and practical course in
temperate climate (zones 4-7) permaculture is that only about 40 of its
over 1000 pages are about the work of planting and maintaining an
"edible forest garden" ("a perennial polyculture of multipurpose
[native] plants"); the rest is understanding what to plant, when, and
why. The whole idea of these gardens is to enable you to harvest an
abundance of varied foodstuffs with almost no maintenance.
The
theory takes up the whole first volume and needs every page. The
challenge, you see, is that even what we might perceive as 'wilderness'
is in fact nothing of the sort. Humans, right back to First Nations
thousands of years ago, have utterly altered the vegetation that now
looks so wild and 'natural'. On top of that, climate change has, since
the ice ages, been continuously changing what grows where.
In
order to allow nature to provide you, effortlessly year after year, a
harvest of abundance, you first need to discover what naturally grew
and what naturally will grow where you live. You need to study the botanical history of your home.
Then, since it cannot be quickly 'restored' to natural, sustainable
state (succession goes through many long intermediary stages and can
take centuries to achieve equilibrium), you need to be smart enough to
plan for a 20-30 year 'hurry-up succession' that will chivy the process
along. You have to plant in stages, knowing that early stages are just
preparing the soil, the ecosystem and the ground cover and canopy for
later stages, and that some of the first things you plant won't be
around at the end of the succession at all if you've done your job
right. This takes serious knowledge and study, a lot of patience and
relearning what our ancestors learned as a matter of course. It's in
many ways a course in what Derrick Jensen has called "listening to the
land".
There probably isn't anything you could learn that would
be more important, for your soul, for your community, for your
resilience in the coming age of climate change and other disasters that
will require us all to become much more self-sufficient than we are
today. Start now, and when cascading economic, social and ecological
catastrophes hit us in the 2030s and bring existing food production and
other systems to their knees, you'll be ready to gather the fruits of
your labour.
Beginning
August 1st, you will no longer be able to send an e-mail to another
employee of our organization. After some study, we have concluded that
such e-mails are almost never the most efficient or effective way to
obtain, provide or exchange information. In fact, we estimate that as
much as 20% of our employees' time is wasted reading, writing and
answering e-mails, beyond the time that it would take to communicate
the same information using more appropriate means.
A
face-to-face meeting, or, failing that, a telephone conversation, is
almost always a more cost-effective way to convey or acquire
information than e-mail. Our study suggests that in 95% of cases, a
telephone call or impromptu meeting can communicate the needed
information without the need for a formal appointment. Being available
for such impromptu consultations is an essential part of every
employee's work, and beginning this year our 360 degree performance
reviews will include an assessment of/by all the people you work with,
regardless of level in the organization, on their/your accessibility,
which will factor highly into overall performance appraisal.
Effective
August 1, all employee Calendars will be visible to all other
employees, and any employee will be able to book time in another
employee's calendar, with the invitee having the option of rescheduling
or proposing another means to converse or meet, but not rejecting the
appointment outright. We trust all employees to use discretion in the
use of others' time, and to use this Calendar booking option only when
attempts to reach the invitee by a visit to their office or by phone
have failed. To avoid excessive 'telephone tag' our voice-mail system
will also, effective August 1, no longer accept messages between
employees of our company.
Please note that, in addition to
face-to-face appointments, phone calls and Calendar bookings, there are
a number of other technologies available for communications:
For
simple, unambiguous, straightforward requests for information,
approval, appointments or instructions, and replies to such requests,
you can use the company's Instant Messaging system. The system should not
be used for more complicated matters -- if it takes a respondent more
than one minute to reply, it is an inappropriate use of this technology.
For conversations that cannot occur face-to-face and which require looking at documents together, you can use the company's Desktop Video & Screen-Sharing
system. This tool requires no pre-booking and can allow users to
'share' the contents of each other's screen while they converse.
For 'FYI' type communications, the documents should be posted to the appropriate category of the company's E-Library,
where those interested in the document who have subscribed to it by RSS
will automatically receive notification about it. If you think someone
should subscribe to a category they are not subscribed to, suggest this
through an Instant Message.
For surveys, where you are seeking
consensus, in those rare cases where a face-to-face brainstorming is
not a much more effective means of achieving it, you can use the
company's Instant Survey tool.
For group training or sending of instructions to a large number of people, you can use the company's E-Learning
tool for asynchronous training, or, if interactivity is expected, the
company's Desktop Video & Screen-Sharing system for real-time
events.
Because e-mail and voice-mail have been used for so
many things for so long, it will take some practice to wean ourselves
off these sub-optimal technologies, and they will continue to be
available for communications with those outside the company. You may be
surprised to learn that e-mail has only been the principal medium for
business communications for ten years. You will, we believe, find it
liberating to be able to go home each day, and come in each day, with nothing in your inbox.
Let us know (drop by or phone us) how we can help you cope with any lingering e-mail addiction. Enjoy the freedom!
Photo from birdstar.org, one of the amazing shots from the Bond brothers of SW Ontario.
Disparity, Poverty and Environmental Health:I'm reading Hervé Kempf's How the Rich are Destroying the Earth (review next week). His message, from France, is essentially the same as Ian Welsh's in his new article There Was a Class War. The Rich Won. The message, and the messages that naturally flow from it, are:
For
the last 30 years, everywhere in the world, income and net wealth for
the poorest 95% of the population has been, in real terms declining,
even as income and net wealth for the richest 5% has doubled and
redoubled. Disparity of income and wealth has never been higher. The
top 1% in the US alone now receive almost 25% of its total national
income.
This economic improvement for 1-5% has come at an
astronomical environmental cost, a massive increase in pollution and
waste, the desolation of much of the Earth, surpassing the climate
change tipping point, increasing global indebtedness to staggering
proportions, pushing us over the edge to the End of Oil and Water,
ruining ecosystems in much of the world and accelerating ten-fold the
biodiversity loss that heralds the sixth Great Extinction in the
planet's recorded history.
There are no economic 'market' or
technology fixes for either the economic disparity or the environmental
devastation that continue to accelerate every day. What is left is
belief in violent political revolution, belief in a collective new
social consciousness that will drive a spontaneous plunge in global
consumption and a massive redistribution of wealth, belief in the
Rapture, or belief that our civilization is inevitably in its last
century.
You know which I believe. Thanks to Jon Husband for the link.
A Plague
of Economic Locusts: Andrew Leonard at HTWW adds up the factors
that have caused me recently to liquidate most of my investments.
Favourite quote: "Faith-based
economics seems like an unsound management philosophy, for
those of us without
the power to part the Red Sea and make a getaway from a falling dollar,
rising oil prices, and insolvent banks".
A Symbol for Gaia:
When I write about a better way to live, or about wilderness, or the
need to connect with all-life-on-Earth, I've been using a photo of a
temperate rainforest in the US Pacific Northwest Olympic range to "illustrate" the
article. This is because there doesn't seem to be a symbol or logo for
Gaia, for living in balance with nature. When I did a search I found
the old 1960s environmental symbol (a take on the Greek letter omega).
I also found the symbol at right, developed by gaia.com member
(and author of the Gaia
Girls book series published by Chelsea Green) Lee Welles.
I really like the logo, since it taps into the aboriginal importance of
quartets (four elements, four seasons, four directions etc.) and is
based on a circle. During the search, Barbara Dieu
pointed me to flickrcc,
which shows you a collage of photos on any subject you key in. Birds in
flight, forests and waterfalls prevail for photos tagged 'Gaia'. To me this is a fascinating way
to capture "the wisdom of crowds" about a subject visually.
Booking Time for Real-Time Chat: Google now allows you to put a badge, like the one below, on your blog
to indicate if you're available for an IM/VoIP chat via GMail/GTalk.
You don't even have to have a GMail account to ping me. Problem is, I'm
not available for such chats very often. So before I put the badge on
my sidebar, I need to add to it a Google Calendar showing my
'conversation office hours', the times when I will
be available. Ideally, it would be interactive, allowing readers to say
what they want to chat about, so I can invite others to join in. May
take awhile for me to set up.
Imagine, blogs as a medium for real-time conversations! Thanks to Theresa Purcell for the link.
Manipulative Language, and the Abuse of Power in Conversation: Andrew Campbell retrieves and elaborates on a fascinating model by Vincent Kenny on Dead Language vs Live Language and how power politics in conversation 'deadens' the language and dialogue and saps its power, creativity and usefulness.
I'm learning how to listen more attentively to conversations, their
nuances, what is said and implied and unspoken, unconsciously conveyed.
Now I'm discovering I must also learn to observe the way in which
language in conversation is sometimes wielded as a weapon, to stop
thought and creativity and sharing and connection and everything else
it is valuable for.
The Wrenching Photography of Amy Stein: The photo above is an example of Amy Stein's disturbing and ominous photographs. Her full collection entitled 'domesticated' is here, and if you're not faint of heart it's worth a look. Don't say I didn't warn you. Thanks to Emily & Daisy at Our Descent for the link.
Why Is It Called a "Retreat"?: Evelyn Rodriguez writes about the need to turn off the noise from external sources, and to withdraw to our true selves,
to rediscover them, to find our true bearings, our centre, before
reconnecting with others, in order not to become too much
Everybody-Else. Geoff Brown Sketches the Civilization Bubble:
A fascinating Nancy White style drawing by Geoff (above) shows us
within Gaia, as a bubble, and the ways in which nature is pushing back
against our unsustainable 'inflation' are depicted as pins, each threatening to burst the bubble if it expands any further. Brilliant.
Games for Change: If we're going to spend time playing video games, why not make them informative and get that energy directed at ways that can make the world a better place? Thanks to Graham Clark (who also supplied the quote in the thought for the week below) for the link.
Thought for the Week: variously ascribed to Al Rogers or Eric Hoffer:
In
times of profound change, the learners inherit the earth, while the
learned find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world that
no longer exists.
I'm
going to be on Bowen Island, near Vancouver BC, September 28 through
October 1, for an Art of Hosting event. The program teaches several
interactive meeting and facilitation technique skills -- World Café,
Circle, Open Space Technology, Appreciative Inquiry -- and it would be
great to have the chance to meet with as many of you as possible while
learning something new and useful (and inexpensively!) together at the
same time. Please look at the invitation,
and if you decide to go, let Chris and me know ASAP -- it's not a large
venue, though it is astonishingly beautiful. Hope to see you there!
PS:
If you can't make that, I'll be in San Jose September 23-25 for KMWorld
& Intranets, Quebec City August 8, Montreal September 18 and
Vancouver September 26-27. Let me know if you're available for a meetup!
In
May 2005 I wrote this post that, after it was picked up months later on
Digg and other popularity lists of web articles, turned out to be my
most-visited article ever:
Our minds are like our bodies --
fail to exercise them and they atrophy and break down. We live in an
age of specialization, where we are encouraged to narrow our interests
and our activities, to focus and limit ourselves to doing things at
which we are very competent. So parts of our brain get a lot of
exercise and other parts very little. What's worse, this can actually
narrow our comfort zone, the range of things we enjoy doing or thinking
about and are competent in. Many of our cultural activities and
artefacts: political debates, win/lose competitions, hierarchies, laws,
religions, 'best practices', systematization, uniforms, and monolithic
architecture and design -- all tend to reinforce 'one right answer'
thinking that discourages and ultimately excludes and prevents us from
thinking differently. Even the mental exercises we do as we get older
are designed to stem the loss of analytical skills and
memory rather than broadening
our thinking or our thinking ability. We live in a world of stultifying
sameness and uniformity: physically, ideologically, intellectually.
There is little motivation, little day-to-day need, to exercise the parts and processes of our brain that rarely get a workout.
Kathy
Sierra over on Twitter has been throwing two types of teasers at us
this week. The first are what she calls 'rules that aren't always
useful',
that I'd call 'false
myths and limiting generalizations', such as:
don't feed trolls
two heads are better than one
nobody reads the manual
there is no money in [x]
the customer is always right
grow or die
you can't be both profitable and socially
responsible
In case you think 'false myth' is a redundant expression, a myth
(literal meaning= word of mouth) is anything that has received such a
wide degree of acceptance, or such passionate acceptance, that it is rarely
questioned. Some myths are true.
The problem with the false myths are that they can blind you to the
truth if you accept them uncritically. They can constrain your
imagination of other possibilities that are contrary to the false myth
'conventional wisdom'. They can lead you to make very bad decisions.
The problem with limiting generalizations is that they can lead you to
oversimplify ("to get ahead in business women have to think and act
like men"), to draw false dichotomies ("we either have to find new
domestic oil or be forever dependent on foreign suppliers") and
to stereotype ("working class whites will always vote Republican" which
can lead you to draw false inferences from correlations, to write off
classes of people, and to inhibit your creativity.
The second teasers Kathy has been tweeting are what she calls
'perspective hacks' that I'd call 'reframing
questions', such as:
What might change if you view the Big Thing You're
After as a component/subsystem of a greater whole?
That really cool very specific thing you learned...
what happens if you ask what else
that might apply to?
Instead of trying to change this behaviour, what if
we tried to understand how it came about and adapted ourselves
accordingly?
Kathy has a flair for this type of thought-provoking meme. As I thought
about what I'd put on my list of false myths and limiting
generalizations, and reframing questions, it suddenly occurred to me
that these two are linked: for every false myth or limiting
generalization, there is at least one reframing question that can get you out of
the uncritical, unimaginative thinking trap and help you discover new
possibilities and achieve breakthrough perspectives.
Here, for example, are ten false myths and limiting generalizations
that I encounter nearly every day in business, and how, instead of arguing with
those who spout them, I might reframe the discussion with a question to
show those people, gently, another way to see the situation.
false myth or limiting generalization
reframing question
talent shortage: if you want smart people to work for you, you have to pay them a competitive rate for their time
what
if you could produce an invitation so compelling that smart people
would be willing to come together and solve a problem for free?
business needs hierarchy: without instruction and supervision, work just won't get done
what if you gave people an interesting, challenging, attainable objective and just trusted them to figure out how to achieve it?
if you have a new business idea, you need to find 'angel investors' to finance it or there is no hope of it succeeding
what
if you got the prospective customers for your new idea to 'invest' in
it, in return for a say in design and a better rate of interest than
the bank pays?
if
you want to deploy a social network tool in the organization, you need
to produce a 'business case' showing ROI and addressing security issues
what
if you just did an experiment, outside the firewall on your own time,
using young tech-savvy employees, and then just showed everyone how
easy, inexpensive and useful it is?
marketing is expensive: if you can't achieve an x% market share with a new innovation in y months, it's not worth the risk
what
if you just developed a simple, inexpensive demo/beta/prototype, and
showed or gave it away, and relied on word of mouth to 'sell' it?
a company needs to provide an ROI to shareholders that is commensurate with its risk, or no one will buy shares in it
what
if you organized the enterprise as a cooperative, with members who
received products for their investment instead of shareholders
demanding profits and dividends?
to
make a new technology successful, you have to persuade management to
make training compulsory for all, because otherwise people won't use it
properly
what
if you only used technologies that are so simple and intuitive that
they need no training, and are open source and public so they need no
development?
you need performance objectives and bonuses to motivate people to work hard and work smart
what
if you made work fun, and let people choose their own hours, and then
asked them what else it would take to get them to do their best?
a business that doesn't grow is doomed to die
what
if you set the objective of the business to grow better without growing
bigger, and left it to the employees to figure out how to do that?
you need to show your finished, quality product to customers; they won't ever buy an 'idea'
what
if you abolished the idea of 'customer', and instead partnered with the
people who might buy your product and co-developed it with them
Isn't
this cool? It's a bit like the technique in some martial arts of
parrying with a deflection, defusing the attacker's momentum by
changing the rules of the contest and putting them off balance.
What
are the false myths and limiting generalizations that you are
struggling with, and how might you use appropriate questions to reframe
them, disempower them, put them to rest?
Subscribe to this blog by
MADE IN CANADA
trust your
instincts
MY GRAVITATIONAL COMMUNITY
People
who have inspired or informed me frequently over the past few months.
For my full blogroll/online reference library, see
here. [* indicates
people I connect with in real time, f2f, via IM, Skype or SL chat.]
The thoughts expressed herein are strictly those of the blogger.
I'm listening to:
WHAT
THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF
Blog readers
want to
see
more:
- original research,surveys etc.
- original,well-crafted fiction
- great finds: resources,blogs,essays, artistic works
- news not found anywhere else
- category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
- clever, concise political opinion consistent with their own views
- benchmarks,quantitative analysis
- personal stories,experiences,lessons learned
- first-hand accounts
- live reports from events
- insight:leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
- short educational pieces
- relevant "aha" graphics
- great photos
- useful tools and checklists
- précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
- fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content
Blog writers
want to see more:
- constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
- 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
- requests for future posts on specific subjects
- foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
- reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
- wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
- comments that engender lively discussion
- guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs