|
|
March 7, 2003
|
|
Few people know that public pounds are a cheap source
of dogs ($6 apiece!) for research labs. In Ontario, pounds
have to hold the dogs for three days, and then they
can sell the stray pets to labs that use them for experiments.
If there is an order from a laboratory, the pound is required by law, after
the three-day waiting period, to provide the animals ordered to the laboratories
rather than euthanize or continue to hold them. The process is called Pound
Seizure.
There is a bill before the Canadian Senate that will finally put some teeth
into Canada's pathetic animal cruelty laws. Under present law, animals are
treated as 'property', and there are virtually no restrictions on what people
can do with their 'property', including abuse. Small fines provide no disincentive
to Canada's horrific and booming puppy mill industry, and even the severest
abusers cannot be given jail sentences or prohibited from owning animals in
future. CBC Television's
Disclosure
public affairs program, in a report called No Safe Place, looked
at the proposed new law and was surprised to find that the body responsible
for monitoring treatment of laboratory animals was opposing it. This body,
a 'self-regulatory' group set up by the research labs, has no teeth to punish
its members, cannot under its charter reveal its findings to non-members or
the public, and has only enough resources to inspect each lab every 4-5 years.
It is the only group 'protecting' laboratory animals from unimaginably horrific
treatment in labs that are off-limits to the public, and whose very existence
and location are often kept secret 'to prevent interference from extreme
animal-rights organizations.'
Disclosure's investigations led to their discovery of the Pound
Seizure rule shown in italics above. The link above takes you to a story of
a lost family pet that was caught by this rule and euthanized by the lab because
it was 'unsuitable' for experiments. It also contains the CBC's usual thorough
on-line backgrounders for its investigative programs, and a rich set of resources
for more information. But it contains no recommendations for action. So rather
than just seething about this, I thought I would offer some:
- If you are a Canadian, please write, e-mail or phone your
Member of Parliament
and the Senate Committee
on Legal and Constitutional Affairs
to urge them to support quick passage of Bill C-10b (formerly Bill C-15b)
intact. If you get a response attempting to justify some
proposed amendments to the bill, explain that you can support amendments
that would explicitly define what constitutes 'unnecessary', 'brutal',
'suitable' and 'adequate' treatment of animals, but that you cannot
support (a) leaving the definition of these terms to the discretion of
some regulatory body, or (b) exemption of any industry or group from the
provisions of this legislation. The language and scope of this law is very
modest, and laboratories, breeders, and farmers need not fear prosecution
under this legislation unless they are doing something really heinous.
- No matter where you live, find out what the local pound seizure,
laboratory/breeder/farm inspection and animal cruelty laws are, and lobby
to have the laws toughened and enforcement properly funded.
- Pound seizure dogs cost $6. 'Purpose-bred' dogs (a euphemism
for dogs specifically bred for lifelong lab experimentation) cost up to $600.
In some jurisdictions individual pounds are allowed to adopt a policy
refusing to sell animals for experimentation. No matter where you live, call
your local pound and find out if they have such a policy, and what the 'waiting
period' is for euthanizing or selling animals. Lobby to get such policies
implemented and waiting periods extended. Support local rescue organizations
that take in dogs from pounds before they can be sold to laboratories or euthanized.
Don't let your own pet run loose, and have him/her neutered. Don't buy a
pet from a pet store - rescue one from the pound instead. (They make great,
and grateful pets: Read about
ours
.)
- Whenever you have a choice, buy only products that specifically
state on the label that animals were not used to test them.
- Althougn raising the cost of lab animals should help reduce
the most frivolous use of animals for experimentation, it will not be enough
to eliminate it. Biologists from many disciplines have gone on record as saying
that animal experimentation is not necessary for effective research or veterinary
training, and that it continues because there is no legal or economic
incentive to develop or use alternative testing and training methods.
Work with your local humane organizations to urge your legislators to enact
laws that put a 'sunset date' after which animal testing, experimentation
and unnecessary treatment during veterinary training will be legally prohibited.
These guys have the money and resources to develop alternatives (in many cases
they already exist, but are more expensive). All they need is motivation.
In a civilized and humane society, animal cruelty is a disgrace. Let's do
and spend what it takes to develop alternatives quickly, and then stop it.
|
7:45:52 AM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2004
Dave Pollard.
Last update:
19/02/2004; 2:41:10 PM. |
|
|
SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World
SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs
Technorati
Profile

WHAT
THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF
Blog readers
want to
see
more:
|
- original
research,
surveys etc.
- original,
well-crafted
fiction
- great
finds: resources,
blogs,
essays, artistic works
- news
not found anywhere
else
- category
killers:
aggregators that
capture the best
of
many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
- clever,
concise
political opinion
(most readers
prefer these consistent with their own views)
- benchmarks,
quantitative analysis
- personal
stories,
experiences,
lessons learned
- first-hand
accounts
- live
reports from events
- insight:
leading-edge thinking
&
novel
perspectives
- short
educational pieces
- relevant
"aha" graphics
- great
photos
- useful
tools and
checklists
- précis,
summaries, reviews and
other
time-savers
- fun
stuff: quizzes,
self-evaluations,
other
interactive content
|
Blog writers
want to
see
more:
|
- constructive
criticism,
reaction,
feedback
- 'thank
you' comments,
and why readers liked their
post
- requests
for future
posts on specific
subjects
- foundation
articles:
posts that
writers can build on,
on their own blogs
- reading
lists/aggregations of
material on specific,
leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
- wonderful
examples of
writing of a
particular genre,
that they can learn from
- comments
that engender
lively
discussion
- guidance on
how to write in
the
strange world of
weblogs
|
|

This work is licensed under a Creative
Commons License.
|
|