Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.



March 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Feb   Apr


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >




Kucinich 2004




Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  March 10, 2003


As Scott Rosenberg asserts in today's blog post, the definitive word on Iraq has now been written. It is contained in a lengthy, complex and balanced essay by Salon's Greg Kamiya called Sleepwalking Toward Baghdad. If you haven't seen it, read it, bookmark it, send it to others. There is nothing more to say.
9:56:58 PM  trackback []  comment []

skills 2x2 We've just been through another exercise at work to help us identify our, and our employees', skills, and how to improve them. There are a mass of these, from What Color is Your Parachute to Do What You Are .  For a quarter century, in both hiring and assessing performance of staff, I've used a simpler model that's evolved over time. It says every job (and perhaps every task in life) requires some combination of four groups of skills:

Creative Skills
  • Ideation: Coming up with new ideas [CI]
  • Representation/Spacial Skills: Capturing, applying and executing these ideas [CR]
Language Skills
  • Written Communication [LW]
  • Oral Communication [LO]
  • Non-Verbal Communication [LN]
Knowledge Processing Skills
  • Synthesis: Distilling and summarizing information [KS]
  • Analysis: Breaking down information [KA]
  • Interpretation: Determining what information means; adding insight [KI]
Interpersonal Skills
  • Sensing: Listening and appreciation [IS]
  • Connecting: Engaging, sympathizing and relating [IC]
  • Persuading [IP]
So how do you use this? You map the skills you have against the skills you need for your job, like I have done in the scatter chart in the upper right. If most of the dots are in the upper right and lower left cells, your skills are well aligned with your job: You're probably doing well and are happy at work. If most of the dots are in the upper left cell, you're probably over your head, or at least struggling. Success will depend on how many of the dots you can move over to the right (by honing your skills). If most of the dots are in the lower right cell, you're probably bored out of your mind. Your skills are not getting exercised, and it's doubtful you'll be happy in your current job. Better hope you like the people you work with. When I've done this exercise with my staff, I usually find at least five of the eleven dots in this quartile, so I'm not at all surprised that most people are unhappy with their jobs.

You can use this method to assess your affinity for a hobby (like blogging) as well. I tried this myself, and it told me to keep my day job.

I'm currently exploring how this skills model could be applied in some rather unorthodox ways:
  1. Comparing skills of humans with those of animals ( ravens make especially interesting subjects) to assess animal intelligence, which I believe is wildly under-estimated. 
  2. Exploring the relationship between instincts (innate abilities) and skills (acquired abilities), and answering questions about the learning process, and which skills you can learn versus which (I suspect none) are strictly hereditary.
  3. Articulating why 'survival skills' are poor substitutes for the instincts that they are designed to replace.
  4. Debunking the myths of, and cult of, leadership in Western society. More about this in a future post.

4:57:40 AM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 19/02/2004; 2:41:10 PM.

SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs


Technorati Profile


.
.
.
.
.
.


Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.



WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.