Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.



March 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Feb   Apr


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >




Kucinich 2004




Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  March 24, 2003


baghdad face Other anti-war bloggers seem to be doing a fine, and extensive, job of commenting on the war. I'd decided to focus my attention on correcting misinformation, but there is so much of it out there that it's almost easier to list what is credible and corroborated.  Almost all of the early reports and predictions have turned out to be either completely false or wildly exaggerated:
  • Massive defections and surrender: The Pentagon claims there are fewer than 3,000 POW's, so that's an upper limit, after five days of hundreds of thousands of invading soldiers marching through half the country. 
  • Cheers for the conquering army: These have been, on more than one occasion, ruses or just displays to prevent feared aggression from the U.S./U.K. troops. Contrary reports from the dubious Moonie press (UPI, Washington Times) notwithstanding.
  • WMD finds: There haven't been any found, or any used against the invaders. Even the U.S. military acknowledged that the report of a huge chemical weapons plant was 'premature', i.e. probably bogus.
  • Death of Saddam & family, Aziz etc.: Despite interviews with ex-mistresses, government disguise experts and psychics, there is no credible evidence that anyone in the family was killed or injured or that Saddam press conferences were pre-taped.
  • Oil Fields Blown Up: Early reports of the number seem wildly exaggerated, and there seems to be nothing systematic. Latest count from the U.S. military is seven fires.
  • Precision Strikes and Limited Civilian Casualties: The UK Independent is the only paper that seems to be talking about this (77 so far in Basra). The most credible numbers are shown on the bar at right from IraqBodyCount.org - see their site for explanation of the estimation process. The reporters in Baghdad who are not 'embedded' seem to corroborate the precision of most strikes. If any war has 'good' news, this precision, and the low casualty figures, are it. The sieges on Basra and Baghdad may yet produce humanitarian disaster , however. Keep watching the numbers or get your own counter from the IBC site.
  • Weblogs from Iraq are Bogus: Despite all the talk, there is no evidence of this. The best known blog Dear Raed just reads too straight and balanced to be propaganda, with equal distain and distrust for both Saddam and the invaders.
My only other thoughts on the war so far: Admiration for the 'unembedded' press: Their courage and the value of their independent reports is amazing. And dismay at the uselessness of the 'embedded' press: Even the once-proud BBC crew are reduced to repeating military press releases and ooh'ing and aah'ing at the pyrotechnics in the distant sky. And Kevin Sites' blog was shut down by his own bosses at CNN.

Don't get me wrong. The examples above are disparaging of the Western propaganda machine and the toothlessness of most of the Western media in the face of it. But as Dear Raed reports, the misinformation being fed to Iraqis by their government's propaganda machine is just as incredible. But we don't get to see much of it.


10:05:32 PM  trackback []  comment []

nonconfirm With all the propaganda and groupthink swirling around, we sometimes need to be reminded that dissent and critical thinking are not only commendable and healthy, but essential to personal growth and social progress. Rayne has described a recent situation where it was very uncomfortable having a different point of view on the war from a friend's, and Kriselda has described the insidious effect of groupthink in her Third Wave post. If you're against this war, I'm sure you were tempted to go mute after reading about the spike in popularity for the Iraq war (once it became clearer that war was inevitable, and more likely that our side would 'win'), or after learning that a third of American voters still believe despite all evidence that Saddam and Iraq were somehow responsible for 9/11.

There are many great quotations, from Thomas Jefferson and Einstein and Morley to Chomsky and Mamet and Rushdie and Voltaire that can give us courage to continue to express dissenting views dispassionately. When I lose heart, I take inspiration from CEM's 1970s-era New Yorker magazine cover (reproduced above left), and from the following lines by poet e e cummings. 
to be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best, night and day,  
to make you everybody else
means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight,
and never stop fighting

8:10:13 AM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 19/02/2004; 2:41:13 PM.

SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs


Technorati Profile


.
.
.
.
.
.


Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.



WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.