|
|
March 24, 2003
|
|
Other anti-war bloggers seem to be doing a fine, and extensive, job of commenting
on the war. I'd decided to focus my attention on correcting misinformation,
but there is so much of it out there that it's almost easier to list what
is credible and corroborated. Almost all of the early
reports and predictions have turned out to be either completely false or
wildly exaggerated:
- Massive defections and surrender: The Pentagon claims
there are fewer than 3,000 POW's, so that's an upper limit, after five days
of hundreds of thousands of invading soldiers marching through half the country.
- Cheers for the conquering army: These have been, on more
than one occasion, ruses or just displays to prevent feared aggression from
the U.S./U.K. troops. Contrary reports from the dubious Moonie press (UPI,
Washington Times) notwithstanding.
- WMD finds: There haven't been any found, or any used against
the invaders. Even the U.S. military acknowledged that the report of a huge
chemical weapons plant was 'premature', i.e. probably bogus.
- Death of Saddam & family, Aziz etc.: Despite interviews
with ex-mistresses, government disguise experts and psychics, there is no
credible evidence that anyone in the family was killed or injured or that
Saddam press conferences were pre-taped.
- Oil Fields Blown Up: Early reports of the number seem
wildly exaggerated, and there seems to be nothing systematic. Latest count
from the U.S. military is seven fires.
- Precision Strikes and Limited Civilian Casualties: The
UK Independent
is the only paper that seems to be talking about this (77 so far in Basra).
The most credible numbers are shown on the bar at right from
IraqBodyCount.org
- see their site for explanation of the estimation process. The reporters
in Baghdad who are not 'embedded' seem to corroborate the precision of most
strikes. If any war has 'good' news, this precision, and the low casualty
figures, are it. The sieges on Basra and Baghdad may yet produce
humanitarian disaster
, however. Keep watching the numbers or get your own counter from the IBC
site.
- Weblogs from Iraq are Bogus: Despite all the talk, there
is no evidence of this. The best known blog
Dear Raed
just reads too straight and balanced to be propaganda, with equal distain
and distrust for both Saddam and the invaders.
My only other thoughts on the war so far: Admiration for the 'unembedded'
press: Their courage and the value of their
independent reports
is amazing. And dismay at the uselessness of the 'embedded' press: Even
the once-proud
BBC crew
are reduced to repeating military press releases and ooh'ing and aah'ing
at the pyrotechnics in the distant sky. And Kevin Sites' blog was shut down
by his own bosses at CNN.
Don't get me wrong. The examples above are disparaging of the Western propaganda
machine and the toothlessness of most of the Western media in the face of
it. But as Dear Raed reports, the misinformation being fed to Iraqis
by their government's propaganda machine is just as incredible. But
we don't get to see much of it.
|
10:05:32 PM
|
|
With all the propaganda and groupthink
swirling around, we sometimes need to be reminded that dissent and critical
thinking are not only commendable and healthy, but essential to personal
growth and social progress.
Rayne
has described a recent situation where it was very uncomfortable having
a different point of view on the war from a friend's, and
Kriselda
has described the insidious effect of groupthink in her Third Wave
post. If you're against this war, I'm sure you were tempted to go mute after
reading about the spike in popularity for the Iraq war (once it became clearer
that war was inevitable, and more likely that our side would 'win'), or after
learning that a third of American voters still believe despite all evidence
that Saddam and Iraq were somehow responsible for 9/11.
There are many great quotations, from
Thomas Jefferson
and
Einstein and Morley
to
Chomsky and Mamet and Rushdie and Voltaire
that can give us courage to continue to express dissenting views dispassionately.
When I lose heart, I take inspiration from CEM's 1970s-era New Yorker
magazine cover (reproduced above left), and from the following lines by
poet e e cummings.
to be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing
its best, night and day,
to make you everybody else
means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight,
and never stop fighting
|
8:10:13 AM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2004
Dave Pollard.
Last update:
19/02/2004; 2:41:13 PM. |
|
|
SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World
SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs
Technorati
Profile

WHAT
THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF
Blog readers
want to
see
more:
|
- original
research,
surveys etc.
- original,
well-crafted
fiction
- great
finds: resources,
blogs,
essays, artistic works
- news
not found anywhere
else
- category
killers:
aggregators that
capture the best
of
many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
- clever,
concise
political opinion
(most readers
prefer these consistent with their own views)
- benchmarks,
quantitative analysis
- personal
stories,
experiences,
lessons learned
- first-hand
accounts
- live
reports from events
- insight:
leading-edge thinking
&
novel
perspectives
- short
educational pieces
- relevant
"aha" graphics
- great
photos
- useful
tools and
checklists
- précis,
summaries, reviews and
other
time-savers
- fun
stuff: quizzes,
self-evaluations,
other
interactive content
|
Blog writers
want to
see
more:
|
- constructive
criticism,
reaction,
feedback
- 'thank
you' comments,
and why readers liked their
post
- requests
for future
posts on specific
subjects
- foundation
articles:
posts that
writers can build on,
on their own blogs
- reading
lists/aggregations of
material on specific,
leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
- wonderful
examples of
writing of a
particular genre,
that they can learn from
- comments
that engender
lively
discussion
- guidance on
how to write in
the
strange world of
weblogs
|
|

This work is licensed under a Creative
Commons License.
|
|