|
|
March 31, 2003
|
|
Interesting analogy by Alan Bisport in the
American Politics Journal
this weekend. Bisport compares America to "a family that has been repeatedly
brutalized by a drunk."
They think, like the abused wife: "let them steal the presidency,
they'll be good after that; let them plot a war for oil and then look for
the provocation, then they'll stop; let them create their Shadow Government
and hold secret meetings with corporate cronies to plot national policy,
and then they will be content; let them ignore the Constitution and abuse
the Bill of Rights, and that will hold them; let them tap our phones and
eavesdrop on our e-mails and insult our friends and alienate the rest of
the world, and then they will see the error of their ways; let them have
their war, their shock and awe, their murder of civilians and babies, and
they will stop, they will be good...."
This is a troubling analogy, but it would explain a lot. The strong global
outpouring of anti-Bush opinion, like the police berating the abusive husband,
may have caused the American people, the abused wife, to close ranks to protect
this threat to their beloved family. It is an irony and a tragedy that abused
family members often become complicit in the violence they are suffering in
the misguided belief that they are somehow to blame for the behaviour
of the abuser. Follow through the analogy, and you'll come to the 'I' word,
and a lot of suffering and perhaps some permanent damage. Just thinking about
this makes me shudder. |
11:13:03 PM
|
|
Kriselda at
Different Strings
reports the outrageous behaviour of Richard Condon, a DJ in Louisiana with
Citadel Communications, who incited listeners to break up a planned
anti-war demonstration and "put bullets in the heads" of the demonstrators.
Police were present to prevent the resulting confrontation from turning excessively
violent, but the unrepentent Condon egged on the pro-war crowd and concluded
with a call to "nuke Canada", presumably after the "cakewalk" in Iraq is
over. Citadel has taken no calls and no action.
This brings to three, along with pro-war demonstration organizers Clear
Channel Communications and Dixie Chicks banners Cumulus Media,
the number of radio conglomerates with Republican connections using their
vast corporate muscle to oppress dissent and first amendment rights. Between
them they own almost 2000 U.S. radio stations (Clear Channel 1500, Cumulus
260, Citadel 225). If you're not hearing any anti-war songs or news on the
radio, now you know why.
It will also probably come as no surprise that, while 86 newspapers
(per Google News) reported on Nick De Genova's outrageous anti
-war remarks, and hundreds reported Peter Arnett's firing for talking to
Iraqi TV, only one reported the Condon call to murder protesters.
Must be that damn liberal media bias...
|
11:09:27 PM
|
|
I've recently reported (here
and here
) the most egregious examples of Western war propaganda that were picked
up by the mainstream media and run as 'fact', only to be debunked as wild
exaggerations or complete fabrications a few hours or days later. Looking
at them again, I notice that quite a few of these received first mention or
particular prominence in certain publications. To help bloggers more easily
filter news from nonsense, I now present:
The Dubious News: Publications Not To Be Trusted
Publications of Sun Myung Moon:
UPI
Washington Times
Publications & Media of Right Wingnut
Rupert Murdoch
:
New York Post
WNYW-TV
FoxNews
London Sun
Australian
Brisbane Courier-Mail
Adelaide Advertiser/Sunday Mail
Canberra Times
Sydney Daily Telegraph
Melbourne Herald/Sun
Publications of Right Wingnut Conrad Black:
London Daily Telegraph/Spectator
Jerusalem Post (Richard Perle is a Director)
New York Sun (
"dissent=treason"
)
Chicago Sun-Times
Marginally Dubious - Watch List:
MSNBC/Slate (GE)
CNN (AOL)
Wall Street Journal/CNBC (Dow-Jones/GE)
If there is sufficient interest, I will update and maintain this list until
the end of the war. Suggestions for additions to the list are welcome. If
you question the inclusion of any of these publications, take a look at their
websites and note the obvious slant (in what they report and don't report
as news, not in their editorial pages) and their predisposition to
report unsubstantiated and unsubstantiable news. |
10:44:30 AM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2004
Dave Pollard.
Last update:
19/02/2004; 2:41:15 PM. |
|
|
SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World
SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs
Technorati
Profile

WHAT
THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF
Blog readers
want to
see
more:
|
- original
research,
surveys etc.
- original,
well-crafted
fiction
- great
finds: resources,
blogs,
essays, artistic works
- news
not found anywhere
else
- category
killers:
aggregators that
capture the best
of
many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
- clever,
concise
political opinion
(most readers
prefer these consistent with their own views)
- benchmarks,
quantitative analysis
- personal
stories,
experiences,
lessons learned
- first-hand
accounts
- live
reports from events
- insight:
leading-edge thinking
&
novel
perspectives
- short
educational pieces
- relevant
"aha" graphics
- great
photos
- useful
tools and
checklists
- précis,
summaries, reviews and
other
time-savers
- fun
stuff: quizzes,
self-evaluations,
other
interactive content
|
Blog writers
want to
see
more:
|
- constructive
criticism,
reaction,
feedback
- 'thank
you' comments,
and why readers liked their
post
- requests
for future
posts on specific
subjects
- foundation
articles:
posts that
writers can build on,
on their own blogs
- reading
lists/aggregations of
material on specific,
leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
- wonderful
examples of
writing of a
particular genre,
that they can learn from
- comments
that engender
lively
discussion
- guidance on
how to write in
the
strange world of
weblogs
|
|

This work is licensed under a Creative
Commons License.
|
|