|
|
April 4, 2003
|
|
Recently, my staff held a half-day retreat to brainstorm how they could effectively
and compellingly persuade our employees to make better use of the firm's
'knowledge resources': the intranet, the extranet, our business researchers
and analysts, databases of news and publications purchased from external
vendors, and our community-of-practice coordinators. When they asked me for
my ideas I reached into my dreaded consultant's bag of tricks and pulled
out: The Elevator Pitch.
For those blessed enough to have lived their lives free from consultants,
business gurus and flavour-of-the-month programs, the Elevator Pitch is a
succinct yet engaging presentation that produces commitment to action from
the listener(s). It is so called because it is time-limited to the duration
of an average elevator ride.
My staff of course wanted to know precisely how long this was. Having done
my research, I said that it was generally accepted to be between
thirty seconds and one minute, which, perhaps not coincidentally, is also
the duration of another spiel with the same objective: the commercial. I
noted that research claiming the average elevator ride was two to three minutes
was suspect, since it was sponsored by companies that sell those annoying
silent screens in the corners of elevator cars that display advertising and
news headlines.
I also noted that, although most people read about 275 wpm, and speed readers
about 800 wpm (proofreaders average only 180 wpm however), the average comfortable
speaking and hearing rate is only 160 wpm (though tests indicate that if
you use a digital compressor that speeds that up to 210 wpm without altering
pitch, there is no loss of comprehension, which raises some interesting commercial
possibilities). By contrast, typists range from 30 to 150 wpm, and longhand
writers average 30 wpm.
If you do the math, that means your Elevator Pitch should be no longer than
160 words.
My staff of course wanted an example. Could I provide a sample of a successful
Elevator Pitch they could model theirs on?
I replied that I just had.
And I just have, again.
(Postscript: Actually, if you convert this model to the written
word, that would suggest that the ideal 'Elevator' Blog/Essay length would
be 275 words. Most of my favourite essays by other bloggers are about 550
words, about two minutes' worth, which I think is a fairer limit.)
|
7:22:09 PM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2004
Dave Pollard.
Last update:
19/02/2004; 2:42:52 PM. |
|
|
SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World
SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs
Technorati
Profile

WHAT
THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF
Blog readers
want to
see
more:
|
- original
research,
surveys etc.
- original,
well-crafted
fiction
- great
finds: resources,
blogs,
essays, artistic works
- news
not found anywhere
else
- category
killers:
aggregators that
capture the best
of
many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
- clever,
concise
political opinion
(most readers
prefer these consistent with their own views)
- benchmarks,
quantitative analysis
- personal
stories,
experiences,
lessons learned
- first-hand
accounts
- live
reports from events
- insight:
leading-edge thinking
&
novel
perspectives
- short
educational pieces
- relevant
"aha" graphics
- great
photos
- useful
tools and
checklists
- précis,
summaries, reviews and
other
time-savers
- fun
stuff: quizzes,
self-evaluations,
other
interactive content
|
Blog writers
want to
see
more:
|
- constructive
criticism,
reaction,
feedback
- 'thank
you' comments,
and why readers liked their
post
- requests
for future
posts on specific
subjects
- foundation
articles:
posts that
writers can build on,
on their own blogs
- reading
lists/aggregations of
material on specific,
leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
- wonderful
examples of
writing of a
particular genre,
that they can learn from
- comments
that engender
lively
discussion
- guidance on
how to write in
the
strange world of
weblogs
|
|

This work is licensed under a Creative
Commons License.
|
|