|
|
April 25, 2003
|
|
Now get your set of US regime change playing cards (
.pdf format
) from the satirical TRO. Absolutely hilarious pictures of the entire Bush
regime, neocon wingnut advisors and corporate cronies. Fun! Educational!
A great reminder to keep tabs on your elected (and unelected) reps and to
vote next year.
[Thanks to
A Blog Doesn't Need...
]
|
8:01:19 PM
|
|
The title of this essay alone is likely
to get me into trouble with both Canadians ("We do not!") and Americans ("You
ingrates still don't get it."), but someone ought to talk about this. Let
me start by dispensing with two myths: That most Canadians and Americans
are really very similar, and that Canada couldn't exist without American
support and forbearance.
I spend half of my work life working with Americans and half with Canadians.
While there are dangers in generalizing, recent opinion polls illustrate
fundamental differences between American and Canadian worldviews and value. Here are three major differences:
- Americans are unilateralists, Canadians are multilateralists:
The latest Environics poll shows that 70% of Canadians still oppose
the attack on Iraq, not because they think Saddam was a great guy,
but because they think military action against another country must
have international support. Seventy percent of Americans now think the Iraq
war was justified. That's a huge difference of opinion. The very concept
of a pre-emptive unilateral attack on another nation is anathema to most
Canadians. And having the majority of a country right beside you support
a regime that relishes pre-emptive unilateral military adventures is terrifying.
- Americans have an authoritarian worldview, Canadians have
a conciliatory worldview: A survey taken in 2000 revealed that 44% of
Americans but only 20% of Canadians believe "the father of the family should
be the master of his own house" and that "good parents make and enforce strict
rules for their children". If you buy
Lakoff's
nation-as-family metaphor for conservatives (strict father worldview) and
liberals (nurturing parent worldview), this means that Americans are evenly
split (perhaps badly, even schizophrenically split) between conservative
and liberal worldviews, while Canadians, like Europeans, are overwhelmingly
liberal. The US is arguably the only developed country in the world where
conservative views are sufficiently prevalent today to elect a government.
To most Canadians this ideology is so outdated, so nonsensical and doctrinaire
, that to see it pursued so aggressively by the most powerful nation the
world has ever known is frightening.
- Americans like hierarchy and structure, Canadians like heterarchy
and diversity: Another survey taken in 2000 revealed that 47% of Canadians,
but only 19% of Americans, believe organizations work best when there is
no single leader in charge. Many Canadians have learned the hard way that
you don't criticize your American boss. The American cult of leadership is
hard for Canadians to fathom: Canadians routinely poke fun at their managers
and ridicule their Prime Minister. Canadian managers get paid much less than
their American counterparts, while new recruits get paid more. Americans'
fanatical patriotism and flag-waving is seen by Canadians as xenophobia and
intimidating zealotry rather than as pride and respect for their country
and authority.
Put aside for a moment the Bush administration's bullying and threats of
retaliation against Canada for its non-support of the war. Put aside the
hypocrisy of Bush's claim to support free trade while his trade negotiators
are reneging on every existing trade agreement that restricts American companies.
Put aside Bush's refusal to sign Kyoto and his attempt to undermine the World
Court of Justice. I think most Canadians see these actions as Bush/neocon
excess, and not representative of the views of Americans. The only thing
frightening about these particular actions is that the US political system
allows one small group of mostly (entirely?) unelected people to wield this
much power so undemocratically. The only Canadian prime minister that expected
that kind of blind trust from the electorate (Brian Mulroney) almost destroyed
the country when Canadians refused to be bullied into accepting his reckless
plan for constitutional reform. He was ousted in disgrace and his Conservative
party has never recovered. Americans seem to like arrogant, swaggering leaders;
Canadians loathe them.
Most Canadians also think the 'average' American (not to mention the average
Republican president) is woefully ignorant of world history, geography, culture,
and current events outside the US and Iraq. That may or may not be a fair
assessment, but it underlies the Canadian perception that Americans see Canada
as somehow utterly dependent on US largesse. By every standard except GDP,
Canadian living standards are higher than those in the US. The trade interdependence
is two-way: to a significant degree the 1990s US economic boom was sustained
by handy access to Canadian labour that is more productive and 30% cheaper
than their US counterparts', and by Canadians' willingness to sell them raw
materials at bargain prices and then buy back the finished goods at a premium.
And while Canadians would clearly be unable to defend themselves from an
attack by a larger enemy, they also believe that no one else could or should
defend Canada either, and that the best defence is hence neutrality, negotiation,
consensus-building and a global reputation for peace-keeping and fairness.
Ironically, Canada's very proximity to the US seems to reinforce these differences
and the fear they elicit among Canadians. Those Canadians who are conservative,
materialistic, entrepreneurial and religious are far more likely to move
to the US, widening the Canada/US worldview gulf further. Twice the proportion
of Americans vs. Canadians believe in trying to convert non-Christians, and
three times the proportion describe themselves as evangelical Christians
or as 'born-again'. Twice the proportion of Canadians believe the government
should guarantee adequate health, education and welfare for all citizens,
but Canadians are even more opposed to government restrictions on civil liberties
than Americans.
Canadians opened their hearts and wallets to help America after 9/11. They
fought side-by-side with Americans in Afghanistan. It was Canadians who liberated
the American hostages from Iran. But now 70% of Canadians fear retaliation
from the neighbour with whom they are economically joined at the hip. They
read that 30% of Americans would like to annex Canada. They hear about US
boycotts of Canadian goods, and US demonstrations whose leaders propose to
'nuke Canada'. And they read that 70% of Americans support an administration
that stands against almost everything Canadians stand for. They don't understand,
and they're afraid.
Postscript: Lovely quote from (Canadian) Robert MacNeil of PBS MacNeil-Lehrer Report fame: Canadians view America with a little kind of ironic distance. It's part of the Canadian psychological mechanism for asserting its own identity in the face of the overwhelming force of the American economy and popular culture.
|
3:14:26 PM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2004
Dave Pollard.
Last update:
19/02/2004; 2:42:57 PM. |
|
|
SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World
SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs
Technorati
Profile

WHAT
THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF
Blog readers
want to
see
more:
|
- original
research,
surveys etc.
- original,
well-crafted
fiction
- great
finds: resources,
blogs,
essays, artistic works
- news
not found anywhere
else
- category
killers:
aggregators that
capture the best
of
many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
- clever,
concise
political opinion
(most readers
prefer these consistent with their own views)
- benchmarks,
quantitative analysis
- personal
stories,
experiences,
lessons learned
- first-hand
accounts
- live
reports from events
- insight:
leading-edge thinking
&
novel
perspectives
- short
educational pieces
- relevant
"aha" graphics
- great
photos
- useful
tools and
checklists
- précis,
summaries, reviews and
other
time-savers
- fun
stuff: quizzes,
self-evaluations,
other
interactive content
|
Blog writers
want to
see
more:
|
- constructive
criticism,
reaction,
feedback
- 'thank
you' comments,
and why readers liked their
post
- requests
for future
posts on specific
subjects
- foundation
articles:
posts that
writers can build on,
on their own blogs
- reading
lists/aggregations of
material on specific,
leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
- wonderful
examples of
writing of a
particular genre,
that they can learn from
- comments
that engender
lively
discussion
- guidance on
how to write in
the
strange world of
weblogs
|
|

This work is licensed under a Creative
Commons License.
|
|