Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.



August 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Jul   Sep


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >




Kucinich 2004




Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  August 24, 2003




goofy golfYesterday we hosted our annual neighbourhood adults-only barbecue, a delightful but boisterous group of 80 people. We welcomed our two new neighbourhood couples. One of the neighbours catered the event for cost. Another neighbour laid out a 9-hole Goofy Golf course (see map) that stretched across the hundred-acre neighbourhood (we're virtually fence-free, and neighbours actually vie to 'host' one of the holes, putting out coolers of beer and inviting players to stop for a dip in their pools). Goofy golf is played with a sand wedge and a tennis ball and the 'holes' are a foot in diameter. We play it before the barbecue and it's open to kids as well. Another neighbour hosted an afternoon children's picnic and amusement fair. We also held a raffle for donated prizes, and raised $750 for a local children's charity, and then played Euchre and 8-ball into the wee hours. The last straggler left at 3 am, and of course no one had to drive home, which was just as well.

This is what every neighbourhood should and could be like. It works because:
  • Since we're relatively isolated here out in the exurbs, sharing our community with wolves, coyotes and other wildlife, events like blizzards and power failures (two in the past two weeks, including the Big One) force you to get along with, and stay in touch with, your neighbours. In the city, it's just too easy to be anonymous.
  • Despite the young average age (forty) of the residents, and the long (45-minute) commute to Toronto, the neighbourhood is so physically attractive that no one ever wants to leave, so turnover is almost zero.
  • We've all escaped from other residential models (urban, rural, suburban) that we didn't like, so we're determined to make our community work.
  • We're spread out enough and separated by protected conservation corridors (not shown on map above) that we're not visible or audible to our neighbours, so disputes are very rare.
My purpose for describing this is to make a couple of points about neighborhoods and to describe a few concepts about community that I think are very important. My points are these:
  • I believe overpopulation and overcrowding underlie many of the problems of our world. Our neighbourhood shows that when people have room to be themselves, they tend to be peaceful, cooperative, and environmentally sensitive. They can afford to be. We need to make this luxury available to everyone. To do so we need way fewer people on the planet.
  • I believe political, legal and business problems grow and proliferate exponentially when the size of the physical area, the number of people affected, and the degree of concentration of power increases. Functional communities, like our neighbourhood, where everyone participates and everyone knows everyone else, have almost no problems. But once you get up to national, state and local governments and large, centralized corporations, there are too many players, too many people uninformed, uninvolved, unaffected, and this is where all the problems start. Small is beautiful, and the smaller the more beautiful, and the more effective and self-managing.
We each live and work in three distinctive types of communities, each of which has a different makeup and function:
  1. Neighbourhoods - those people with whom we physically share space, where we live, at various levels of aggregation from our immediate neighbours to whole nations and even the planet we share with others.
  2. Collaborators - those people with whom we make a living. As I've pointed out in my essays on New Collaborative Enterprises, I believe a new model is needed to replace the bankrupt and dysfunctional corporate model we developed a few centuries ago.
  3. Networks - those people with whom we share a common interest. We all belong to many networks.
Only since the advent of modern transportation and communication technologies have these three types of communities become distinct. Until a century or two ago, most people married and worked with their neighbours, and played and prayed with them. But for most of us we still have no real choices about the communities we live, work and play in. Most of us still live in unsafe, crowded neighbourhoods, surrounded by strangers. These neighbourhoods in turn comprise cities, states and nations run by despots and criminals, by the self-serving and power-hungry, unaffected by the consequences of their actions and indifferent to the suffering of those they supposedly represent.

Most of us still work in jobs where we have unequal say, or no say at all, where name and wealth always trump talent, and where those at the top neither know or care about the plight of those 'under' them. And most of us cannot afford, access or understand the technologies that allow people to find like minds in communities of interest: potential soulmates, playmates and workmates.

At one time, before the three types of communities became distinct, people used terms like nation (literally, those of common birth, referring to a cooperative group of tribes), and company (literally, friends and intimates together for common cause). These words have now been debased beyond recognition, but their original meanings tell us what we must strive again to build -- communities of small numbers of people who for whatever reason (desire to make a living together, desire to live in the same physical setting, or desire to share a common interest) want to commune -- to do things in common. Communities, in other words, that work.

(The author is writing a book about a peaceful, utopian world, with a prescription for making it a reality. This is the second of a series of articles designed to develop the precepts for the book).


5:05:47 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 19/02/2004; 2:51:39 PM.

SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs


Technorati Profile


.
.
.
.
.
.


Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.



WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.