Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.



September 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
Aug   Oct


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >




Kucinich 2004




Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  September 8, 2003


thompson
(Mike Thompson, Detroit Free Press)
A few months ago there was a lot of discussion about a survey of what people around the world think is funny. If I remember correctly, Americans laugh at situations that make people look foolish, Canadians laugh at satire and self-deprecating humour, the British laugh at irony and clever wordplay, and the French (or was it the Germans?) laugh at silly, non-sequitur humour.

Since the cancellation of Aaron Sorken's brilliant and charming Sports Night, I've stopped watching 'situation comedies'. The reason? They're not funny. They're mean-spirited, condescending, and maliciously derogatory about others. Maybe it's my Canadian breeding, but I don't find insulting other people amusing. Making a fool of oneself, the way Canadians like Mike Myers, Jim Carrey, Michael J. Fox, Martin Short etc. do, can be funny.

I've scoured the Internet for intelligence on the qualities that make writing humorous, and concluded that there isn't much consensus, except for the element of surprise. To be funny, something needs to be unexpected.

Example: Here is a joke that I think is funny.

After Quasimodo's death, the bishop of the Cathedral of Notre Dame sent word through the streets of Paris that a new bell ringer was needed. The bishop decided that he would conduct the interviews personally and went up into the belfry to begin the screening process. After observing several applicants demonstrate their skills, he had decided to call it a day.

Just then, an armless man approached him and announced that he was there to apply for the bell ringer's job. The bishop was incredulous.

"You have no arms!"

"No matter," said the man. "Observe!" And he began striking the bells with his face, producing a beautiful melody on the carillon.

The bishop listened in astonishment; convinced he had finally found a replacement for Quasimodo. But suddenly, rushing forward to strike a bell, the armless man tripped and plunged headlong out of the belfry window to his death in the street below.

The stunned bishop rushed to his side. When he reached the street, a crowd had gathered around the fallen figure, drawn by the beautiful music they had heard only moments before. As they silently parted to let the bishop through, one of them asked,

"Bishop, who was this man?"

"I don't know his name," the bishop sadly replied, "but his face rings a bell."

The following day, despite the sadness that weighed heavily on his heart due to the unfortunate death of the armless campanologist, the bishop continued his interviews for the bell ringer of Notre Dame. The first man to approach him said,

"Your Excellency, I am the brother of the poor armless wretch that fell to his death from this very belfry yesterday. I pray that you honour his life by allowing me to replace him in this duty."

The bishop agreed to give the man an audition, and, as the armless man's brother stooped to pick up a mallet to strike the first bell, he groaned, clutched at his chest, twirled around, and died on the spot.

Two monks, hearing the bishop's cries of grief at this second tragedy, rushed up the stairs to his side.

"What has happened? Who is this man?" the first monk asked breathlessly.

"I don't know his name," sighed the distraught bishop, but........... he's a dead ringer for his brother."

OK, you're not laughing. How about this, from Homes and Other Black Holes by the inimitable Dave Barry, who thinks exploding toilets are funny:

The most important factor to consider in selecting a real estate broker is an intangible quality called 'profesisonalism' by which I mean 'car size'. You want to select the broker with the largest possible car, because you're going to spend far more time in this car than in whatever home you ultimately buy.

Next you should tell your broker what your Price Range is, so he or she can laugh until his or her official company blazer is soaked with drool. What your broker finds amusing, of course, is that there is virtually nothing, outside of the Third World in your Price Range. I don't care if your Price Range is a hillion jillion dollars, there will be nothing available in it. This is a fundamental principle of real estate.

At first you will probably insist on looking at something in your Price Range anyway, which will result in the following comical dialogue:

YOU: This is it? They're asking $89,500 for a refrigerator carton?
BROKER: Yes, but I think they'll take $85,000.

The Washington Post Magazine recently sent Below the Beltway humorist Gene Weingarten to Paris to write about the cultural differences that have led to tensions between the US and France. His column came out yesterday, and it's here. It's long but give it time -- it's well worth the effort, and the best is at the end, after the set-up.

I analyzed this for some clues to good humour writing, since heaven knows this blog could use some. Weingarten does use stories to engage the reader, which is supposedly an important humour technique. He uses exaggeration, ironic understatement, clever wordplay ("Americans are 'consumers.' By and large, we buy, and are large."), and witty imagery ("the enormous plastic Golden Arches ™ dangle above it on a chain from the roof, like a big cartoon tushie"). Americans and French ideosyncracies are entertained with equal balance, but there is room for touching description (the women leaving gifts at Sartre's grave) and underlying messages and lessons ("Though predominantly Roman Catholic, the French demand secularism in government and find Bush's very public trumpeting of his Christian faith to be naked sanctimony.") even though they require temporary departure from humour.

I could imagine Weingarten slaving over this article for days on end (he was on hiatus from his weekly column for three weeks writing it), painstakingly crafting every phrase, tweaking every sentence to perfect comic effect. But of course he did not. This afternoon, live, he engaged in online banter with readers of yesterday's column. The transcript of the chat is here, and damned if it isn't just as funny as the column. And it's informative. And it is provocative. How can anyone be so gifted to be able to type this out verbatim, unrehearsed, in response to a question about political awareness:

Virtually all the French people I dealt with, from handymen to news dealers to 24-year-old students in the street, were amazingly well informed about the world. Whereas in the United States polls suggest more than half the people think Saddam Hussein launched 9/11. Interestingly, the French seem to understand this about Americans, and LIKE us for it. It explains how we can be nice, decent people and at the same time support Bush: We just don't understand!

Yes, that's arrogance. But it's kind of sweet arrogance.


I'm humbled. I guess that's why I'm a Chief Knowledge Officer and not a humour writer, or, in fact, a writer of any kind, by profession. So I leave the last word to Weingarten, who in another off-the-cuff response to a chat question is able to be at once funny, educational and endearing. We should all be so lucky as to have this talent:

I would say virtually every story has some mistake in it. I am not sure it is a mistake, exactly, but as soon as my wife read it in the magazine, she pointed to the photo of Sophie Martins, whom I had described as wearing a sleeveless top, and she said, "You idiot. That's a tank top."

I said, "But it's sleeveless, isn't it?" And she looked at me like I was hopeless.

It's a gender thing, I guess, like a woman saying the Yankees have three "points."

6:53:17 PM  trackback []  comment []

duck2
Last Call for Submissions for the September 14th
 edition of Virtual Occoquan,
the Blogosphere's premier online journal.

The Advice Edition

We're looking for articles with advice for anyone:
Dubya or Dean or Kerry
Bloggers
The Sick, Tired & Hungry
The Socially or Technically Inept

If you can help anyone with anything
please send your advice to Mark or Dave
by September 10th.
Ducktor Know Thanks You!



9:48:58 AM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 19/02/2004; 2:53:10 PM.

SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs


Technorati Profile


.
.
.
.
.
.


Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.



WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.