Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.



November 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Oct   Dec


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >




Kucinich 2004




Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  November 14, 2003




white russian houseSuppose that some time in late 2000, Russian and Chinese leaders, with the covert support of some other national leaders, were convinced that the US election results had been materially altered by a small right-wing clique, and that as a result the US was in fact no longer a democracy, and its weapons of mass destruction, now apparently in the hands of an unelected, psychopathic and illegitimate group of radical religious extremists, posed an imminent threat to world peace.

And suppose that as a consequence Russian and Chinese forces were sent to quickly and decisively intervene to bring about 'regime change' in the US and return the country to stability.

And suppose that as a result these forces used secret new weaponry to remove this illegitimate government, dropping weaponized anthrax as a carrier for smallpox (the stuff that mysteriously disappeared from Siberia after the breakup of the Soviet Union), to inflict 'Shock & Awe' on this dangerous clique and subdue any supporters it might have across America. Suppose that, day after day, waves of planes dropped tons of these deadly chemicals on alleged 'strongholds' of the illegitimate regime all across America, continuing long after most members of the government and the military and any of those close to them had been eliminated by the deadly and fast-acting toxins. And suppose that, in their zeal, the patriotic coalition fighters sometimes got carried away and replaced the flag of America with their own liberating country's flag.

And suppose that inexplicably the usurping 'President' and 'Vice-President' of the US and a few other members of the inner circle who had seized power illegally were not found. The invading force therefore had to remain, on the chance that these psychopaths, or some other extremist group, might seize power again before law and order and democracy could be restored.

And suppose that, this being a very costly war, the invading force decided to confiscate America's most profitable assets, and put their own people in charge of them, to pay for the cost of the war and incidentally take some of America's vast wealth for themselves.

And suppose that the situation in America quickly degenerated into chaos and anarchy, with people rioting, and looting of the Smithsonian and the Library of Congress and the now-abandoned, chemically poisoned mansions of the obscenely wealthy Americans who had allegedly supported the illegitimate regime. So the invading coalition, not receiving the heroes' welcome they had expected for liberating America from the illegitimate government, had to send in an occupying force to try to re-establish order, and they selected a Chinese general to run the country on an indefinite interim basis.

And suppose that the arrogant, swaggering Russian and Chinese leaders warned their own people that this would be a long and drawn-out entanglement, but that, as justice and the true will of the people had finally prevailed in Vietnam, so would it prevail in America. And suppose the Russian and Chinese media meekly acceded to these arguments and presented their own leaders' smug and cynical lies as unquestionable truths, and assailed independent evidence of Sino-Russian excesses as 'treasonous' attempts to demoralize the liberating forces.

This is of course a highly improbable scenario, and an unfair analogy. Before you flame me, please note I'm not making an argument of equivalency here, moral or otherwise. My purpose is simply to get you, dear reader, to put yourself in the position of someone in a certain mideastern country who is in precisely this situation today.

So just suppose that all of the above had happened. Now picture yourself in 'post-war' America, six months after the end of 'major combat operations', and ask yourself these questions:
  1. Would you want the occupying Sino-Russian forces to remain in America until law & order and democracy could be restored on their terms, or would you prefer them to leave quickly so Americans could sort out their own mess, come what may?
  2. Would you welcome a UN Administration, essentially run by foreigners, to run the interim American government, the police, and the most profitable enterprises for a protracted period of time, at least until the majority of the UN decided America is once again ready to be run by Americans?
  3. Would you resent the seizure of American assets to finance the war and to profit the friends of the occupying nations, and the inability of the occupying force to deal with rampant crime and corruption?
  4. If support for the Sino-Russian invasion back in Moscow was fueled by an utterly discredited theory that the illegitimate American government had somehow been behind previous attacks by Chechen terrorists in Moscow and St. Petersburg, what would your opinion be of Russian conservatives and media that continued to use this fraudulent theory as the primary justification for the attack on America?
  5. If you lived in this ghastly situation, where your economy was in ruins, the war had cost you your life savings, your job, many of your loved ones, and you lived in constant fear for the life and safety of your family, what would you say and how would you behave if young Sino-Russian troops who spoke no English pounded on your door looking for 'sympathizers' of the deposed American regime?

8:58:02 AM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 19/02/2004; 2:56:43 PM.

SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs


Technorati Profile


.
.
.
.
.
.


Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.



WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.