|
|
November 26, 2003
|
|
|
Ten Things I Love About Americans
- They're doers. When they've decided to do something,
they do it. No pissing around. No foot-dragging.
- They're honest. Straight goods. Face value.
- They're friendly. They talk to strangers, and love to help.
- They're risk-takers. No guts, no glory.
- They're generous. They lend a hand, and they give a damn.
- They're open-minded. They embrace new ideas. Only in
America could a book called 'If it ain't broke, break it' become a
best-seller.
- They're casual. Comfort trumps style. No pomposity, no obsession with image. No BCBG for them.
- They're ambitious. They want to succeed, to make the world better.
- They're idealistic. They think anything is possible. So it is.
- They're responsible. They accept what they've done,
for better and for worse. They're full of pride and shame, and rarely
blame others.
|
Ten Things I Hate About Bush
- He's dishonest. Bare-faced liar and seemingly proud of it. Goes with #10.
- He's ignorant. Can't believe he went to Yale. Doesn't understand history, culture, science or human nature.
- He's inarticulate, to the point of incoherence. The
guy with the finger on the button can't utter a complete, clear English
sentence. Very dangerous situation.
- He's a coward. Won't talk to people who disagree with him. Hides from news he doesn't like. Can't or won't debate.
- He's uncompromising and fixed in his thinking. Worse, he thinks that's a good thing.
- He's emotionally troubled. Look at his eyes. Watch the smirk when the stress is highest. Vonnegut was right. He's a cauldron always on the edge of boiling over. Or blowing up. Scary in a president.
- He's intemperate. He gets angry easily and holds long, irrational grudges, even according to his admirers.
- He's ambitious. Yes, the same quality I love in
Americans I hate in Bush. Partly because extreme power and extreme
ambition are a deadly mix. Partly because Bush's ambition is ruthless.
- He's insensitive. He is surely aware of the massive
suffering and damage his actions have caused worldwide, but he clearly
doesn't care; he can justify it in his own mind as a necessary
consequence of his inviolable principles, ideology, dogma.
- He believes the end justifies the means. As did all the worst tyrants in history.
|
Some caveats on the above lists:
- I'm Canadian, and many of the things on the left-hand list
are virtues to most Canadians. In some other countries they're not
considered virtues at all.
- The left-hand list is full of generalizations and there are, of course, many and highly-notable exceptions.
- Because they're so open, Americans are also easily
manipulated and prone to irrational enthusiasms and unfair, even
dangerous, over-reactions, so some of these lovable qualities are
double-edged.
- I find Americans fun-loving, and their best scientists and
best artists are almost without peer, but I wasn't sure how these
attributes fit on the list. Besides, I had to limit it to 10. The rule
of lists, you know.
Photo: Ruth Fremson/NYT taken at Walter Reed Army Medical Center
|
2:28:26 PM
|
|
I've read a half dozen
"layman's" explanations of trackback, and I confess I still didn't
really understand it until yesterday. I also somehow thought it was
connected to comment notification, which it isn't. For those as
befuddled as I was, here's my attempt to explain it. If this just
confuses you further, I apologize in advance.
Trackback simply lets another site
know that you have a post referring to it on your own site. Read
the previous sentence until it makes sense.
Sometimes when you're reading someone's blog you want to comment
directly on their site. But sometimes you want to pursue the discussion
on your own site. If so, and provided the other site has trackback
enabled (i.e. the word 'trackback' appears below each post, as
illustrated above) this is what you do (Movable Type users, I'm told,
must use this
'bookmarklet' process instead of OPTION A):
- OPTION A: If you want
to include a link to the other post in your article: Go to the other
site, click on the word 'permalink' under that post and copy the other
post's 'permalink URL', then draft your article, inserting a link to
the other site with the permalink URL you
copied - OR -
- OPTION B: If you don't
want to include a link to the other post in your article: Go to the
other site, click on the word 'trackback' under that post and copy the
'trackback URL' that pops up, then draft your article and paste the
'trackback URL' in the edit space called 'URLs to Ping'
Now when you post your article, the number in brackets beside the word
'trackback' below the post on the other site you referred to will
increase by one, and when someone clicks on the word 'trackback' on the
other site they'll see en extract from, and link to, your referring
article. In other words, you've established a 2-way link between your
article and the post on the other site.
To allow others to trackback to your site, you need to 'enable'
trackback. The process to enable trackback on your site depends what
blogging tool you use. For Radio users the enabling process (you just
have to do it once) is here.
What the bulleted instructions above describe is called an 'outbound
trackback'. From the perspective of the owner of the other site it's an
'inbound trackback' to them.
Once you're enabled, you can practice on this post if you like. If you
do, I'll reciprocate when I see your trackback by posting a trackback
to one of your articles, so you can see how it works the other way. It
all makes more sense when you've done it once or twice. The only
drawback is that, having given your readers a third way to respond to
your articles (besides comments and e-mail), now you have to check out
your inbound trackbacks as well, to get the complete picture of what
people thought of your article.
As for comment notification,
it's just an e-mail sent to your
inbox each time someone posts a comment on (or trackback to) one of
your blog posts. This is available so you don't have to scour
back through comments threads on your old posts to see if there are any
new comments. The process to enable this also depends on which blogging
tool you use. For Radio users the enabling process (you just have to do
it once) is here.
Postscript: Tests for readers pinging me:
Here is a test ping to Philip at Perils of Caffeine.
|
12:01:50 PM
|
|
|
© Copyright 2004
Dave Pollard.
Last update:
19/02/2004; 2:58:14 PM. |
|
|
SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World
SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs
Technorati
Profile

WHAT
THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF
Blog readers
want to
see
more:
|
- original
research,
surveys etc.
- original,
well-crafted
fiction
- great
finds: resources,
blogs,
essays, artistic works
- news
not found anywhere
else
- category
killers:
aggregators that
capture the best
of
many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
- clever,
concise
political opinion
(most readers
prefer these consistent with their own views)
- benchmarks,
quantitative analysis
- personal
stories,
experiences,
lessons learned
- first-hand
accounts
- live
reports from events
- insight:
leading-edge thinking
&
novel
perspectives
- short
educational pieces
- relevant
"aha" graphics
- great
photos
- useful
tools and
checklists
- précis,
summaries, reviews and
other
time-savers
- fun
stuff: quizzes,
self-evaluations,
other
interactive content
|
Blog writers
want to
see
more:
|
- constructive
criticism,
reaction,
feedback
- 'thank
you' comments,
and why readers liked their
post
- requests
for future
posts on specific
subjects
- foundation
articles:
posts that
writers can build on,
on their own blogs
- reading
lists/aggregations of
material on specific,
leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
- wonderful
examples of
writing of a
particular genre,
that they can learn from
- comments
that engender
lively
discussion
- guidance on
how to write in
the
strange world of
weblogs
|
|

This work is licensed under a Creative
Commons License.
|
|