Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.



March 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Feb   Apr


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >




Kucinich 2004




Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  March 22, 2004


forest
After reading Glenn Parton's wonderful essay The Machine in Our Heads, which I would urge everyone to read, I was inspired to try again to articulate, in simple terms, the environmental philosophy that underlies much of what I have come to believe in the last five years, and which has driven much of my recent lifestyle and behaviour change, and the writing of this blog. Here's the latest attempt, talking to myself out loud:
  1. I believe that Earth, our planet, is a single organism, a self-organizing and self-managing system, which evolves deliberately and 'consciously' to maximize the diversity, the resilience, and the well-being of all its utterly connected component life forms. Like the cells and organs of a human body, the purpose of each creature is to look after and care for its community, and in so doing contribute to the continuance, balance and health of the Whole. In this sense Earth is sacred -- worthy of our absolute respect, reverence and devotion. [Basis: Lovelock's Gaia Hypothesis, Suzuki's Sacred Balance etc.]
  2. I believe that our current culture, which we call 'civilization', was a well-intentioned human invention designed to adapt to, and cope with, a sudden global scarcity of food, which probably arose as a result of the last ice-age. Although this invention was initially successful, producing agriculture, work specialization, and urbanization, its consequences have included war, crime, poverty, overcrowding, epidemic disease, environmental devastation, species extinction, ecological fragility, global warming, massive psychological illness, and violence on a magnitude previously inconceivable in Earth's history. [Basis: Economists Peter Jay & Marshall Sahlins' Original Affluence theories, Diamond's works, Pilger's New Rulers of the World, etc.]
  3. I believe that our current culture, which we call 'civilization', has, as a result, made all of humanity mentally ill, and physically degraded the planet to the breaking point. [Basis: Quinn's Story of B etc.]
  4. I believe that we need to deal with the pandemic psychological damage caused by this culture first, because we cannot galvanize the will, effort, and resources to create a wholly new and radically different culture until and unless we have
    • a clear picture of what our civilization has done to us, and to our planet,
    • a clear understanding that there are no simple, moderate solutions within the vast scope of human ingenuity, no easy way out,
    • a comfort with our ability to live without civilization, and
    • an appreciation of what that means: not a savage, primitive, subsistence, nomadic, hand-to-mouth existence, not a turning back of the clock, but instead, after a period of massive social change and modest sacrifice, moving forward to a paradise on Earth
  5. I believe that man is not naturally violent, acquisitive, greedy, negligent, aggressive or destructive. These are all symptoms of stress-related mental illness caused by our culture. No one is to blame. [Basis: Hall's The Hidden Dimension etc.]
  6. I believe that the psychological and spiritual healing necessary to cure our pandemic mental illness will require a combination of education, to learn about the true cost of civilization and re-learn the alternative ways to live, and support to help each other heal. That education and support will have to be personal and one-on-one. It will be difficult, because we've been so well indoctrinated to believe that our brutal, violent, destructive civilization is the only way to live -- our religions, our institutions, our stories, our moral systems, our reasoning systems, everything we're taught from early childhood, even our language is imbued with cultural bias. But as civilization hurtles us ever more alarmingly to crisis upon crisis, and the absurdity and unsustainability of civilization becomes more obvious, the willingness to create a new culture and abandon the old one will accelerate. And humans lived successfully and peacefully for three million years before civilization culture, so our instinctive knowledge of how to live without civilization, the knowledge of a Sacred Earth culture, is in our DNA. We've just forgotten, and we can learn to remember and rediscover that knowledge. [Basis: Jensen's A Language Older than Words etc.]
  7. I believe that spending time away from civilization is critical to this healing. We can't listen to our instincts if we're surrounded by civilization's louder noises, and we can't reconnect with the Sacred Earth if it's only an abstract concept.
  8. I believe that if we fail to heal ourselves, and fail to create a new healthy culture in time, our world will suffer a series of eco-tastrophes by the end of this century, which will bring an end to civilization anyway, but much more horrifically than if we can replace it voluntarily first. But I'm sorry to say I don't believe we will act in time to create a new Sacred Earth culture. The old culture simply has too much momentum, and belief systems and behaviours change slowly. The old culture is moving too fast and no one is in control, so even though we are already timidly applying the brakes (with efforts like the Kyoto Accord, population growth reduction in some countries etc.) I don't think we can stop before we crash. And many of the victims of the old culture -- corporatists, neoconservatives, and religious fundamentalists especially -- will fight us fiercely and incessantly to prevent anyone from taking their foot off the growth 'accelerator'. They are the worst addicts to our civilization culture, and will be the hardest to liberate. [Basis: Gould's Full House, data from the UCS, Census Bureau, Worldwatch Institute, etc.]
  9. I believe we need to try for a 'soft landing' anyway, no matter how hopeless it may seem. I have no use for neo-survivalists and salvationists, the fatalists at both extremes of the political spectrum who are actually looking forward to the crash that ends our civilization, in the belief that it's inevitable so we might as well get it over with. I've already described in my How to Save the World Roadmap the things I believe must be done in order to avoid eco-tastrophe and bring us, with minimal suffering, into the Sacred Earth culture. My novel (in progress) will describe what life in this future culture could be, will be, like.
  10. I believe we need a Plan B, in case the voluntary measures in my Roadmap aren't enough. If civilization is analogous to a car (with 6.3 billion passengers all fighting for control of the wheel) driving too fast on black ice toward a pile-up ahead, then the Roadmap, Plan A, is most of us applying the brake together with all the force we can muster. Plan B is to ditch the car, to derail it by more drastic means, in the belief that anything is better than a high-speed crash. Plan B is the radical environmentalist's reluctant manifesto, which involves removing those with their foot stubbornly on the accelerator, by force. More on Plan B later this week.
Please let me know what you think of Glenn Parton's essay. If you're a regular reader, you'll know I have little use for psychologists, but I found Parton's paper very compelling. If you enjoy The Machine in Our Heads, you might also like his Humans in the Wilderness paper, published in the remarkable Canadian eco-philosophy magazine, Trumpeter.



12:12:35 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 01/04/2004; 5:49:04 AM.

SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs



Technorati Profile

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

.
.
.
.
.
.


Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.





WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.