Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.



April 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  
Mar   May


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >




Kucinich 2004




Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  April 15, 2004


olympic national park
Nothing cuts through to the core of the debate between those that believe all property should be private (notably the current US Presnit) and those that believe some, or even most, property should be held in common, as public property available for the enjoyment of all, than the issue of lakefront and riverfront ('riparian') access rights. Googling the topic brings up a horde of lawsuits, neighbour vs. neighbour fights, and political grandstanding. What is amazing is that, at least in North America, there appears to be no overarching principle, no constitutional right either to access of recreational and wilderness land (notably beach and waterfront), or alternatively to restrict access to such land as part of basic property 'rights'. So these disputes are decided in the trenches -- in municipal courtrooms, based most often on the wording of ancient deeds and easements than on principled grounds.

Yule Heibel has a delightful post this week that got me thinking about this again. She lives in Victoria BC, where my wife and I lived for five years, and where public rights of access to much (all?) waterfront areas are sacrosanct, under municipal law, except for rare 'grandfathered' cases. She exults in the freedom and the sense of community that such laws engender, and contrasts this with the situation in Massachusetts, where almost all waterfront areas are restricted to individual owners and "residents". She says she learned how to covet from her years there. My reaction would be anger, not covetousness, and, like Yule, I might be tempted to chalk the difference up to Canadian vs. US culture. In my community, we only put up a fence if it is needed to keep pets in, and only then with permission of the neighbours and an open invitation to use the gates to pass through. The Toronto waterfront is almost entirely public access, with parks and walking trails running the entire breadth of the city.

But I would be wrong to chalk this up to Canada-US cultural differences. There are areas in the US where public beach and lake access are enshrined in at least municipal law. And there are areas in Canada where they are not. I remember going for a drive up to Lake Simcoe, about an hour North of Toronto, and being astonished at the signs wherever there was a lake view saying "No parking any time without resident sticker -- strictly enforced". Visitors could drive by, but not stop, not touch, this 'private' lake. And right in my own municipality there is a small park with soccer fields, apparently donated by a private citizen, with a municipal sign saying "Park use by permit only -- no dogs allowed".

As much as I am offended by these restrictions, no matter where they may be (I was equally astounded to find many beaches in the Caribbean off-limits to citizens, fenced and guarded to allow only foreign, paying guests in), I am perhaps even more amazed that, in the absence of any constitutional principle, the situation is not much worse. It says a great deal for the people of those communities that do protect the rights of citizens to the enjoyment of the 'best' land -- waterfront, recreational, parkland and wilderness -- that they do so in the face of those with money and power who would secrete these special lands for the exclusive use of the privileged. I don't know how it might be worded, but I believe it is time we enshrined the right of all citizens to access and enjoyment of all such land without discrimination, before the forces of privatization take away what is left, before the final act in the Tragedy of the Commons is writ.

What is the law where you live? Is it as patchwork and arbitrary as it is here? Or are you able to say, as Yule does,

This is mine, it's all mine, it all belongs to me, and it belongs to you, and to you, and to you, too! It's ours, ours, ours! How do you do?, lovely to see you, I hope you, too, are enjoying our beautiful land! This meadow?, this mountain?, this ocean?, this view? Yes, it's mine, and it's magnificent, isn't it? And I know you must believe this, because of course it's yours, too! We share this!

2:42:54 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 01/05/2004; 12:25:13 PM.

SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs



Technorati Profile

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

.
.
.
.
.
.


Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.





WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.