Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.



May 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Apr   Jun


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >








Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  May 17, 2004


population chart
Regular readers of this blog know that I believe we're headed for ecological catastrophe, driven by the double whammy of overpopulation and accelerating resource consumption (depicted on the charts above, with the red and green lines marking maximum and ideal sustainable levels respectively), and they know that my 'Roadmap' for heading off this catastrophe is a set of 27 actions (technological, social, political and economic), with a more radical backup 'Plan B' if it turns out we're unable or unwilling to follow the Roadmap.

Many others seem to share my alarm about our current situation, but there is no clear consensus on what we should do about it. Over the past year I've described at least eight prescriptions for 'saving the world':
  • Each do what we do best to 'Be the Change' (e.g. Ghandi)
  • Strive for a new collective consciousness (e.g. Jon Schell)
  • Apply our vast human imagination (e.g. Bucky Fuller)
  • Take aggressive, coordinated action (e.g. my 'Roadmap')
  • Lead the way away and others will instinctively follow (e.g. Daniel Quinn)
  • Revolution: Overthrow the system (e.g. Marxists, Anarchists)
  • Radical intervention: Coercion and sabotage (e.g. my 'Plan B')
  • Prepare for inevitable apocalypse (e.g. neoprimitivists, religious salvationists, eco-fatalists)
This past weekend I've been reading about yet another approach, in the work of Elisabet Sahtouris (EarthDance) and Gary Alexander (eGaia), both of whom use the caterpillar-to-butterfly radical transformation metaphor, to call for what I'd describe as a human 'Cultural Metamorphosis'. I'd like to thank Don Dwiggins for bringing this thinking to my attention.

In EarthDance, Elisabet lays out an 11-part prescription to bring about this 'metamorphosis' (the numbers in brackets are cross-references to the equivalent elements in my 27-point Roadmap):
  1. Change how we measure human success from GDP to a measure of well-being
  2. Educate everyone to be aware of the unsustainability of our culture, and what must be changed and why (S1)
  3. Introduce alternative currencies to change human economic behaviour and more equitably distribute wealth
  4. Reduce human fertility by reducing economic and health disparities so large families are no longer necessary (S4, P8)
  5. Encourage voluntary simplicity to reduce resource consumption (S5)
  6. Require all human products to be 100% consumable or recyclable with no pollution or other waste (P1)
  7. Introduce sustainable agriculture -- no ploughing, no tilling, no fertilizing, pesticides or herbicides -- based on Peru's Waru-Waru or Mexico's Aztec Chinampa model, and end agricultural subsidies (P3)
  8. Encourage bioregionalism and local self-sufficiency in production of essential goods (T1)
  9. Migrate from the oil economy to a renewable energy economy (T2)
  10. Use the Internet more aggressively and democratically to enable self-organization ('autopoiesis') of communities, devolve power, share information and facilitate collaboration (T4, T5, S7)
  11. Teach everyone Gaia philosophy -- that we are an integral part of a living, self-balancing Earth organism, and what that entails
Gary's eGaia is consistent with Elisabet's prescription. After outlining his case for change, he introduces a series of principles based on the achievement of peace, cooperation and sustainability (replacing war, competition and growth, the fuels of our current culture). He then presents a future state vision, much as my upcoming novel will do, with vignettes from individuals' lives in a balanced and harmonious future world (though his future world is much less radically transformed than the one my novel depicts). A highlight of his book is his description of Italy's Federation of Damanhur, a fascinating and pragmatic 800-person community built on self-sufficiency and cooperation that exists right now. It's a little too spiritually-based for my tastes, but it demonstrates that modern, self-organized, self-managed communities can work for long periods very effectively and very successfully.

fertco

This reading has modified my thinking somewhat on the Roadmap, and I will be making some changes to the Roadmap as a result. But the more I read about our current situation, the more pessimistic and radical I get in my thinking, and the less persuaded I am that any voluntary program of human behaviour and way-of-thinking changes, legal, economic and political changes, and creative problem-solving, will be substantial enough, or come soon enough, to deal with the crisis we face today. I am increasingly convinced that the momentum of 6 billion people's (and doubling every 60 years) insatiable desire to acquire more, is just too much to overcome in time. And the more I read and think about the natural crisis behaviours of all living creatures in extreme overcrowding and resource scarcity conditions, the more I am persuaded that, if we could take the lid off the population/scarcity pressure cooker, the other social, political, economic, psychological and ecological problems we now face might actually solve themselves.

Here's why I think this: Imagine for a moment two very large islands, A and B, somewhere in time and space. The people of both islands believe they are alone on their world, and in the universe, and that, since they've looked for it in vain for years, each group of islanders believes there is no other land on their world. Now imagine that both islands are in crisis situations -- badly overpopulated and polluted, with massively inequitable distribution of resources, power and wealth, and constant war, violence and bloodshed. Suppose that the human population of island A is growing at 1% per year -- doubling every sixty years, every average lifetime. But there is a new virus on island B, taking the lives of 3% of the population each year, in an apparently random way, so that island's population is actually dropping by 2% each year.

On island B, I believe, any of the prescriptions for change I've listed above -- from Ghandi's 'be the change' to Quinn's 'walk away, build a new culture and others will follow', or even a Cultural Metamorphosis -- will probably work, because the population pressure that underlies all of the other problems is being alleviated, and creating the opportunity for a new start, the building of a new evolutionary culture that will prevent these problems from arising again. In fact, such a metamorphosis might not only be possible on this island, it might be inevitable, because the scarcity necessary to sustain war, violence, the hoarding of resources and the power and authority of the rich elite will quickly and simply dissipate. The people of island B can, and will, 'walk away' from the dysfunctional culture and economy that they will blame for the passing crisis, and build one, or many, diverse and sustainable cultures better suited to their new reality.

But on island A, there is no such opportunity. There is no time, and no space, to try out evolutionary change, no breathing room for widespread public debate or to create awareness of the urgent need for lower fertility, simpler living, less consumption and more equitable distribution of resources. The rich will keep spending more and more of their money and resources protecting what they have from ever-increasing numbers of ever-more-desperate poor, seeing and dealing with only the symptoms (e.g. suicide bombers) of the crisis, and not its underlying cause. The poor will remain convinced that large families -- the labour of which is the only resource they have and can control, the only asset they have of value -- are a critical means of support and survival. On the television stations of island A, the news will all be about current wars, corporate corruption, epidemic disease, the need for more growth, and parochial politics -- there will be no widespread awareness of the crisis, let alone intelligent discussion of its causes and possible solutions. On island A, like on our world today, there is not enough time, and there is no reasonable way out.

So I'm intrigued and enlightened by the Cultural Metamorphosis solution. But I despair that its chrysalis can survive the coming winter, and fear that its butterfly is doomed to be still-born.

(Graphic above is from Thank You For Not Breeding, a film and flash animation by Nina Paley)

2:51:04 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 01/06/2004; 3:53:52 PM.



SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs



Technorati Profile

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

.
.
.
.
.
.


Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.





WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.