Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.



May 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Apr   Jun


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >








Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  May 29, 2004


election map
On June 28, just a month from now, Canada goes to the polls to elect a new government. The situation is very volatile, with the 'sponsorship scandal' -- a scam uncovered by the Auditor General that allowed a group of civil servants to defraud the government of millions of dollars, that has been going on for years under the noses of the asleep-at-the-wheel Liberals in power, is being exploited by the opposition parties, who of course are implying there was knowledge and complicity at the highest levels of Cabinet. The impact has been greatest in Québec, where voters really only have two choices, the Liberals or the separatist Bloc Québecois, and recent polls suggest the fickle voters there could deliver 80% of Canada's second most populous province's 75 seats to the separatists.

Current standings (see map above) are: Liberals 168 (of which 95 are from Ontario and 37 from Québec), Conservative/Reform 73 (almost all from Canada's four Western provinces), Bloc Québecois 33 (all from Québec), New Democratic Party 14, Independent or Vacant 13.

Based on the latest opinion polls, projected standings would be: Liberals 143, Conservative/Reform 85, Bloc Québecois 60, NDP 20. A majority government will require 155 seats. Minority governments have been, in my opinion, the best governments in Canada's history, since they have required the support of the left-wing NDP, which has used its leverage to force introduction of much of Canada's socially progressive legislation. So ironically, the scandal, by weakening the Liberals, could actually produce a more liberal, progressive government.

The Conservative/Reform party, which recently merged two right-wing parties, is under the leadership of Stephen Harper, a (in my opinion) dangerous arch-right-wing ideologue who once advocated Western separatism, wants to dismantle much of the federal government and shift power to the provinces, and likes US-style privatization, two-tier social services and tax cuts for the rich. Like the previous Mulroney Conservatives, this bunch of nutcakes is ready to strike a devil's bargain with the lefty Québec separatists, who they loathe, but who share their desire to devolve power to the provinces. It is frightening to think that these two anti-federalist regional parties (the Conservative/Reform in Western Canada and the Bloc in Québec) could get within striking distance of electoral power in a month, even though they would, combined, have less than 40% of the votes.

Because Canada, like the US, has the antiquated and unfair "first past the post" electoral system (rather than proportional representation like much of Europe), this could lead to a great deal of "strategic voting" in this election. A hugely unpopular, right-wing, misnamed "Liberal" government in British Columbia, which has 34 seats up for grabs, has galvanized angry opposition in that province around the NDP, which could see its 2 seats in that province jump to 20 or more, with a mere 10% shift in popular vote -- showing the absurdity of this system. If Ontario, which has only 4 Conservative MPs now, is sufficiently appalled by the parochialism and extreme right-wing views of the new Reform-dominated Conservatives (and the horrible memories of Mulroney, who is actively campaigning for Harper) to hold their noses and re-elect almost entirely Liberals, we could end up with a totally fractured vote: Almost all Liberals in Ontario, almost all Bloc in Québec, almost all NDP in BC and Manitoba, and almost all Conservatives in Alberta and Saskatchewan. The net result would still be a Liberal-NDP coalition government, but would leave much of the country virtually unrepresented in the Cabinet.

Because the Canadian television networks have again conspired (outrageously) to exclude the Green Party from the Leadership Debates, even though the Greens have about 5% of the popular vote and (unlike the Bloc) run candidates in every riding, the Greens will again be unable to get enough media attention (and hence public credibility) to elect a single MP. By contrast, if we had proportional representation in Canada, based on the latest opinion polls, the Greens would get 15 seats, the NDP would get 48, and the Liberals would get only 108 (the Conservative/Reform Party would get 78 and the Bloc only 45; other small parties would get the remaining 14 seats). This would give the Liberals and NDP combined only a one-seat majority, and they would probably need to include the Green Party in the coalition to provide some room for error. I would be so proud to live in a country with a Green Party Minister of the Environment!

Alas, this is not to be. Instead, we'll be forced to vote strategically for the less offensive candidate (i.e. one of two in most ridings) who has a chance to be elected. In my exurban Ontario riding, those candidates are two right-wing small-town conservatives (the not-really Liberal has distributed anti-gay campaign literature, and the Conservative is a hard-core 'family values' nut). Tweedledum and Tweedledee. The Green Party candidate, Ted Alexander, is a great guy, with more smarts, ideas and business acumen than the two big-party peanut-brains combined, but he doesn't have a prayer of winning. Hobson's Choice again. *Sigh*.

Great Canadian Political/Election Links:
.PlanetVote Canada -- complete election portal with a progressive slant
.UBC Political Library -- detailed political profiles, links, histories, coverage of alternative voting systems
.Globe Election Poll -- scrolling graphic trendline of weekly polls with commentary
.BlogsCanada Political Site -- Jim Elve's list of Canadian political blogs (I'm there!) and other useful sites
.Fair Vote Canada -- Proportional representation advocacy site

10:23:07 AM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 01/06/2004; 3:55:24 PM.



SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs



Technorati Profile

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

.
.
.
.
.
.


Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.





WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.