Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.



July 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Jun   Aug


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >








Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  July 9, 2004


decision processSeth Godin of Fast Company and Purple Numbers fame has a new BHAP (big hairy audacious project) called ChangeThis. The idea is that we need to be more open to well-articulated opposing (or at least different) points of view on important issues. The 'This' in ChangeThis is Your Mind, and by changing it, you will become part of a broader, urgent change movement. The vehicle that gets the ball rolling is something called a Manifesto. Seth has plans for some online Manifestos penned by some very big names.

It's a very intriguing idea, but I don't think it will work, not because of the Internet's limited reach or because of anything inherently wrong with Manifestos, but because it's out of sync with human nature. Here's why, IMHO:
  1. What I've observed is that people want to make up their own minds. They will only read a Manifesto if they already deeply trust its author. A Manifesto by Krugman or Gladwell will go far, but the same ideas by the same source in a NYT editorial or New Yorker article will go just as far. We each have our own (usually small, or very small) audience of people who trust what we write, what we say. A Manifesto will not enlarge one's audience. It is preaching to the choir.
  2. When people write to thank me, it's not for changing their mind. It's because they trust me enough to allow me to inform them about something they're not already informed about -- Tax shifting, or entrepreneurship, or innovation, or whatever. They know me well enough to know my spin, and my blog articles help them learn about something much more quickly than reading books or doing exhaustive research.
  3. So if it's from a trusted source, a Manifesto or blog post or editorial or book review or whatever will help people Make Up Their Own Mind. On any important issue it will not change anyone's mind. People make up their own minds by reading sources they trust. They don't want to change their minds. Only ex-British private school students enjoy real debates, and that's only because they're better at them than anyone else. Most people want reassurance that they're right, and will be more inclined to read things that reinforce what they've decided than things intended to make them change their thinking. That's not lazy thinking, it's good time management. I want to be informed and make up my mind so that IF I need to make a decision (who to vote for, what to buy) I can do so quickly. Making up one's mind is a means to an end.
  4. How and when do people Change Their Minds? Very rarely, and not by reading or debate, but by direct experience. If Bill Cosby goes on the talk circuit and tells me welfare recipients are mostly lazy black women with too many babies, and I'm a conservative or a fan, I'll probably believe him (see today's NYT editorial by Barbara Ehrenreich on this). But if I volunteer at an inner city soup kitchen I learn from direct experience that Bill is full of shit -- he has his facts wrong to start with, and what he says doesn't jibe with direct observation -- the mostly-white women I meet are dying to work, if they could afford day care for their two children. I change my mind. And I no longer trust Bill Cosby -- he let me down, and the next time I hear him I'm going to be inclined to Make Up My Mind that the truth is the opposite of what he's saying.
  5. You want to change people's minds, get them the hell away from the TV, and the newspaper, and the Internet, and let them find out the truth face to face, in the streets, from direct experience.
  6. To every rule there is an exception, and the exception to this rule is that sometimes you can change people's minds by telling them a story. The reason stories are powerful and subversive is that they can be (especially if from a trusted source, or accompanied by remarkable pictures) a surrogate for direct experience. That's why the story can't be too detailed -- the listener/reader needs to internalize the story and make it their own. Then it's as if they were at the soup kitchen, and all of a sudden they don't trust Bill Cosby anymore either. And they loved Bill Cosby. But they suddenly know from 'personal experience' that Bill's facts don't add up. They've changed their minds.
  7. So my suggestion to Seth is to change the word Manifesto to Story before he launches ChangeThis. Ot at least whisper in writers' ears that their Manifesto should be a Story in disguise.
  8. This is not unique to humans. I could tell you a story...
What do you think? Am I just old and curmudgeonly and cynical, or is this really how people make up their minds, and why they change them so rarely?

(Diagram is from an earlier post on The Decision-Making Process)

11:08:11 AM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 02/08/2004; 3:42:06 PM.



SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs



Technorati Profile

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Add to My Yahoo!

.
.
.
.
.


Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.





WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.