Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.



January 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Dec   Feb


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >





Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  January 9, 2005


contempt
You can tell a lot about a society by the way in which it treats its women and children. The difficulty today is that it's really impossible today to assess accurately how a society does treat women and children. The media obsess over the crime blotter to an unseemly degree, giving us a distorted and dismaying view of a world seemlingly wracked in violence and death. But meanwhile contemporary society's willingness to hide its dirty little secrets under the guise of 'the right to privacy' conceals a flood of domestic violence behind closed doors. We know almost intuitively that if we could really see how many women and children are routinely physically, sexually and psychologically abused, as many as one in five in every neighbourhood, rich and poor, we would be aghast and outraged.

Hollywood chimes in with programming that is relentlessly violent, brutal, savage. We are desensitized by this barrage to the point we start to believe that every society, every human culture in history, was and is soaked in blood, anger, depravity,deceit, and incessant cruelty. For the last couple of years I have watched almost none of this diaspora of despair, finding it has no value. I have never particularly received pleasure from visceral stimulation -- horror films, roller coasters, WWF and the rest of the torrent of knee-jerk-revulsion- then- pat-redemption on which the 'entertainment industry' is now almost wholly based. There seems no limit to the degree to which so many will subject themselves to images of crass and manipulative second-hand brutality for the rush of phony relief its end brings. It seems to me addictive -- each depicted atrocity must outdo the last to give the same rush down, and the same bounce back up when normalcy returns at the end of the entertainment. It's been going on since Charles Dickens and Somerset Maugham, two writers I have always loathed.

Do these media distortions -- the overstatement of brutality in the news and in our 'entertainments', and the understatement of brutality in the 90% of the world we never get to see -- Darfur, our own prisons and those in Iraq and Guantanamo, factory farms, the closed doors of each neighbourhood's wife-beaters and child-abusers, the systematic psychological rape of the poor and the weak by the rich and powerful in every workplace and community -- offset, and give us 'on balance' a fair picture of how we treat each other, the degree of humanity and inhumanity in our world?

Yesterday I turned off an award-winning and critically-acclaimed film called Cold Mountain in disgust -- it absolutely wallows, with thinly-disguised glee, in the unmitigated horror of Civil War Appalachia, as if this somehow makes the horrors of today, everywhere else, more reasonable, manageable, an improvement, all right, something by contrast to feel good about. Instead I turned on the radio, in time to catch the 'local' (Toronto) news. I normally don't pay much attention to the news because it's all context-free and unactionable (more to say about this next week). But I was struck by the first three news items, which were all Toronto-area domestic violence stories: A man had been arrested in connection with the murder of his ex-girlfriend. He had been under a restraining order not to contact her, and his arrest was for violating that order on the day of her death, not 'at this time' for the murder itself. The second story was about a woman who had been arrested for the murder of her second baby, aged 7 weeks. Her first baby had died at 5 weeks under 'suspicious circumstances' but there was 'insufficient evidence' for arrest in that incident. The third story was a new suspected murder-suicide -- a man had killed his wife and two children and then killed himself.

What are we to make of all this? Hollywood would have us believe that the world is, was, and always will be soaked, drowning in violence, but that today and here, where the movie theatres and Blockbuster outlets are, we are in relative oceans of tranquility, and we can be smug. The news media would have us believe that while most violence is domestic or gang-related, such violence is routinely sniffed out and prosecuted, and that, with continued police vigilance, we can be relatively safe and secure. More learned helplessness.

I live in a small community of 33 homes, with a total of 32 couples, six other adults, 46 children and 36 pets living in them. Of that 116 people, it is statistically likely that five women, one senior, eight children and seven pets are abused, physically, sexually and/or psychologically, or severely neglected. It is also likely that no one will ever be charged for these crimes, and that their victims will never even confide their suffering to others, let alone receive counseling, amateur or professional, and that they will spend most or all of their lives suffering silently and desperately from these abuses. And adjacent to our community are a block of farms and a slaughterhouse where other unseen, unreported, uncorrected atrocities are undoubtedly occurring. Of course I don't know this for a fact. In the absence of information, even in our very open and close-knit community, it is easy to shrug off the statistics and say that 'our share' of abuse and suffering must be happening elsewhere. It's someone else's problem.

So, aside from an annual donation to women's shelters, youth counseling services, and private animal shelters (the public pounds are mostly complicit in Canada's shame), I do nothing. I completely discount the Hollywood whitewash ("violence is happening, but, thanks to our virtue, not right here and now"). I heavily discount the news, which reports only the no-longer-actionable arrests and prosecutions, and none of the evidence of the epidemic of unreported, unresolved violence and abuse that is, or at least might be, actionable.

I turn off the entertainment media and the 'news' media which provide only distortions and useless information, and pay attention instead to the hard-to-find and under-reported, 'un-newsworthy' analyses of the extent of systemic abuse, violence, and cruelty in our society, which we could do something about if the entertainment and news media hadn't so sapped our will, diverted and distracted us by the unactionable.

Abuse of women and children is unacceptable, period. That abuse perpetuates itself and its perpetrators thrive in an environment where their crimes can be so easily concealed, denied, swept under the map. Every year 4,500,000 children die of diseases that are readily and inexpensively preventable or curable with today's technologies. That's the same as the number of people who died in the recent tsunamis, every twelve days. Tens of millions more suffer silently, surviving this year to become the victims of next year or the year after. But we do nothing for these 4,500,000 each year because they are not newsworthy. Just as the women and children in every community -- even yours -- who struggle every moment of their lives, not only as victims of abuse and cruelty, but as victims of poverty and disease and lack of education and other crimes perpetuated by the state, by all of us, are not newsworthy.

If you can tell a lot about a society by the way it treats its women and children, what does this say about us?



2:42:51 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2005 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 01/02/2005; 8:37:30 PM.



SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs


leaf THINKING OF MOVING TO CANADA?
(immigration info blog)


Technorati Cosmos


Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Enter your email address below to subscribe to How to Save the World


powered by Bloglet

Add to My Yahoo!

.
.
.
.
.


Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.





WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.