 The Idea:
Look at those who crave and hoard power, and who are indifferent to
suffering and death and destruction, and you'll probably find a
psychopathic personality who has been tipped over the edge by lack of
emotional connection. The lack of affection, and the neediness it
breeds, may be the toxic seed that grows into the architects of the
destruction of our world.
I confess I have struggled with Glenn Parton's most recent pro-polyamory (free love) essays.
It's not the ideal that bothers me, it's the amount of weight he puts
on the idea: That if we all freely and unjealously found multiple
sexual partners the basic problems of the world would be solved (I'm
exaggerating, but not by much). This has bothered me especially because
his earlier essays resonate so powerfully with me. So I've been giving
it some thought and I think I see a reconciliation between his ideas
and mine. I would argue that it is emotional neediness
that underlies most of the antisocial, ecocidal behaviour that is
destroying our world. I would acknowledge that a polyamory culture
would be both a manifestation of a less emotionally needy world, and a
means to reduce emotional neediness, though I doubt that it is either a
necessary or sufficient condition to significantly reduce emotional
neediness.
First, some definitions. Needs versus wants. A need is a want that will
lead to pain, illness or suffering if it is not met. Needs and wants
can be physical (food, material possessions, sex), emotional (space,
peace, natural connection, security, reassurance, to be loved, to be
needed), or intellectual (share ideas and information). Nutritional
food is a physical need. Personal possessions are physical wants.
Sharing ideas and information are intellectual wants. Emotionally
healthy people have few emotional needs other than the need for
connection. Emotionally ill people, I would argue, have substantial
emotional needs, bordering on the addictive. This article will attempt
to present a theory of why there is so much emotional neediness in our
modern world, and how this neediness is causing us to destroy our
planet.
I'm going to use myself as a case study, and I hope that this will help
readers to understand the 'frames', the social worldview, underlying my
argument. So I need to give you a brief history of my emotional life
and health:
I presume that as an infant I was needy, but that in the Gift Social
Economy that was my world at that time I managed to somehow return the
gifts of attention that my parents bestowed on me. As a baby I was
attractive enough to be featured on the front page of the city paper.
Until I was 8 or so that Gift Social Economy continued: The
neighbourhood kids with whom I played were generous with their time and
attentions, as was I. Everyone knew I was partial to one girl in
particular, but to my knowledge there was no jealousy, as my
infatuation never caused me to decline social interaction with anyone
else. But then the Gift Social Economy gave way to a Competitive Market
Social Economy: The cute girls began to hang out exclusively with the
tall guys. The teachers began to favour the more obedient and diligent
students as I grew bored with the lessons. My body grew slowly and
awkwardly. I lacked, and didn't learn, social graces and coordination,
so I couldn't dance or swim, was lousy at sports, and my face was
ravaged by acne. My communication skills, written and oral, failed to
develop. By the age of sixteen I was a shy, introspective teenager with
few friends, and an average student. I was a daydreamer, and (showing
my shattered ego and desperate need for 'popularity') I aspired to move
to Australia and become a politician. I had nightmares, and I was
anxious and unreasonably frightened of people and social interaction.
And then at seventeen I discovered I loved poetry and literature and
began to read, and then to write -- unoriginal, banal stuff atrociously
written at first, but it improved with practice and encouragement from
a wonderful small group of peers. And my increasing reading breadth
gave me more authors to mimic in style and vocabulary. After a year I
had become an accomplished writer and I graduated from high school with
several scholarships, a renewed sense of self-confidence, and utterly,
hopelessly, intellectually in love.
From that enormous and sudden emotional high the crash was precipitous.
I loathed university -- the idea of learning by sitting in a classroom
and listening to someone talk seemed ridiculous to me. I was
intellectually bored and emotionally numb. Then I went into the
work-world and faced the humiliation of begging for crappy menial jobs.
I sank into a serious depression (early 1970s -- a lot of that going
around then). Then I began to succeed in the work world, moving up
quickly. My social life went quickly from non-existent to frenzied,
exploiting the lingering remains of the 'free love' era for all it was
worth. My ego recovered (over-recovered) and then, when I realized that
there was no depth to any of these relationships, I crashed again. For
a couple of years my few friends worried that I would commit suicide.
And then I met Anita, and she pulled me up, told me to grow up,
introduced me to her extraordinary, open, well-balanced children, and
made me what I am today. I re-engaged with the world, worked hard and
successfully, taught myself to be creative, and leveraged my ambition
and skills into several promotions, until I once again hit the wall
five years ago.
My depression returned. I found my newest job, which tore me away from
customers and had me working for a guy whose leadership style and
vision were the antithesis of mine, to be ill-suited to my talents as a
writer, an idea cross-pollinator, and a skilled coach of entrepreneurs.
We moved to our new neighbourhood in the country, which I love, but my
intellectual restlessness continued. It was filled in part by a
voracious increase in reading and then by this weblog. I quit the job,
and with it left the depression behind. I'm still struggling with my
'Second Career' decision, and I'm nervous about where my life is going,
but I'm confident and happy. Even my growing sense of despair about
where our world is headed can't get me down.
The three periods in my life when I lacked emotional connection -- late
childhood and adolescence, early twenties, late forties -- led to
emotional neediness, which in turn led to emotional illness
(depression) and then to anti-social behaviour (withdrawal, anger etc.)
That's a bit of an oversimplification of my roller-coaster life, but
it's pretty accurate. I was lucky -- three times I fell victim to
emotional disconnection and
three times I was rescued by those who cared, or to some extent rescued
myself. I've always been blessed with great 'support groups'. I've
talked, especially in recent years, to dozens of people who recount
this same downward spiral in themselves and/or many people they know --
starting with being emotionally cut off, through exaggerated emotional
neediness, emotional illness and anti-social, even pathological
behaviour. It manifests itself in different ways but the pattern,
illustrated in the top chart above, recurs with astonishing regularity.
I've known a number of very wealthy people, and in those environments
emotional disconnection seems almost endemic. Parents are detached in
showing affection (or any other emotion) to their children, they're
often physically absent, the kids go to private schools where they
associate only with others of their 'station', they learn all the
social graces but never seem very comfortable with other people, almost
as if they've lived their lives in a bubble. They tend to either
conform to a disturbing degree or all-out rebel at some point in their
lives, and substance abuse and other addictions are common among them
in adolescence and early adulthood (sound like any politicians you
know?)
Then they fall into line and behave outwardly in an acceptable manner,
but by then the damage is done. Most of them are psychopathic
personalities:
- Callous unconcern for the feelings and welfare of others,
- Incapacity to maintain enduring relationships,
- A penchant for deceitfulness,
- Inability to feel guilt,
- Bravado about getting away with illegal activities.
When they got older and were handed power on a platter it further
corrupted them, giving them employees and customers and voters and
lackeys and sycophants and gold-diggers to abuse and cheat, land and
natural resources to despoil, and the means to avoid responsibility for
their actions and even avoid contact with those their corporate,
political, economic and social damage hurt the most.
These are behaviours of the emotionally disconnected, playing
themselves out in dangerous ways. The few people I knew who were
physically abused as children manifested nearly identical behaviours.
All of these people hurt, in turn, orders of magnitude greater numbers
of others. A disproportionate number end up in positions of power and
influence, positions which seem to draw them, perhaps to serve as a
salve for their emotional emptiness. "If you don't want
to connect with me emotionally", they seem to be saying, "then I'll get
so powerful and so successful at manipulation and scheming you damned
well won't have any choice". Rich or poor, power over someone is very
important to them. Scratch a political tyrant, a corrupt business
leader, a polluter, a pimp, a spouse or child or animal abuser, and
nine times out of ten you'll find that emotional hollowness, that
vestige of disconnection. The vast majority of such people, for some
reason, are male.
As Kurt Vonnegut has argued, I suspect it's because they're such expert
liars, and so manipulative, insecure, ambitious, addicted to power and
needy for attention, that they end up holding a wildly disproportionate
sway over political, economic, social, educational, media and other
activity in our world, and as such their psychopathy is playing itself
out in massive ecological and human destruction. Only an emotionally
damaged psychopath would fly back from his private ranch to sign a bill
to force nurses to keep a brain-dead woman alive indefinitely, yet
knowingly wouldn't so much as lift a finger to help the half a million
in Darfur who are suffering from relentless and savage brutality,
deprivation and overt genocide.
How many unhappy couples do you know that are bound together in
co-dependence rooted in emotional disaffection earlier in (or even
throughout) their lives? He desperately
needs to be loved, and if he's not well placed enough or ruthless
enough to build his fan base politically, economically, coercively, he
will command it from the one he claims to love, and the children
conceived with that love. He's jealous, angry, yet somehow emotionally
distant, insensitive. She, on the other hand, needs to be needed -- and he's the perfect antidote because he needs so badly.
What possible hope is there for the children of such a dysfunctional
relationship, with this horrific model the only one they know to follow
when their emotional emptiness and need begins to manifest itself?
So that's the
theory -- neglect or ignore or abuse a child and he'll grow up to ruin
the lives, livelihoods and environment of hundreds or thousands, and
will have children who will perpetuate the cycle. The answer lies not
so much in polyamory as in community--
a connected community (not the transient neighbourhoods of
coincidence and convenience most of us live in today) where affection
and attention is gifted generously, and where everyone feels
emotionally whole, fulfilled, healthy, and secure. This in turn creates
a virtuous cycle, as that emotional warmth and connection breeds
generous, self-confident behaviours, behaviours that heal
heartache,discharge fear and loneliness, and in so doing heal our whole
planet .
A planet where there is no need to destroy the world to fill the empty place inside.
|
MADE IN CANADA
trust your
instincts 
