Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.



May 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Apr   Jun


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >





Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  May 5, 2005


whisperingI'm in the process of reading Derrick Jensen's Walking on Water, a Gattoesque condemnation of our education systems. Although I'll save his comments on how to help people learn more effectively for another post, he makes two points that apply to more than just learning. Although Jensen is one of the world's most relentlessly pessimistic critics of modern society, when he tries to make people learn he is always complimentary, positive, respectful and encouraging -- a cheerleader who believes his purpose is to enable people to realize their potential and focus on their strengths, not to browbeat them about their failures. And at the same time he is always honest to a fault. When he cannot honestly be complimentary, he says nothing. When it is necessary to challenge a suggestion, a concept or an idea, his criticism is always indirect and focused on how to make it better, not what's wrong with it. His responses are more likely to start with what if than but, and more likely to end with a question mark than an exclamation point.

What's more common, I think, in the Western world anyway, and not just in our education systems, is the exact opposite. We love debate. Our television and movie entertainments (both comedic and dramatic) are full of arguments, the more heated the better. A clever all-out rant is invigorating and fun to hear or read. In meetings we jump all over new proposals like vultures. Some teachers and professors pride themselves on reducing their students to tears. And when we are complimentary, it's often dishonest -- to salve our guilt, to seduce someone, for some other ulterior motive or just to bring an unpleasant or boring conversation to a quick close.

We are equally poor at accepting compliments, probably because we're so used to them being dishonest or at least insincere. We expect they are often sycophantic, and meant for the consumption of others in the room more than for the recipient.

So I have a proposal. I want to start a Whisper Campaign. Sometime in the next 30 days, identify someone you genuinely admire, and when the opportunity presents itself, whisper, or say in a low voice, when no one else is paying attention: You're amazing. And then just smile, pat them on the shoulder or shake their hand, and walk away.

Now I can hear you saying to yourself this won't possibly work. Worse, it might get you charged with sexual harassment, pandering, or even infidelity. That's why it's important not to say it loud and not when anyone else can eavesdrop. It is less likely to be startling or embarrassing if it's said quietly. The smile is to let them know you're sincere and not being sarcastic (and don't tell me people won't assume you were being sarcastic -- without the smile and the pat they might just stay awake all night fretting about what you really meant). And by just walking away you make it clear that you're not expecting, or waiting for, a response. But make absolutely sure it's sincere -- if your motive for saying it is to get anything in return don't say it (if you do, and it backfires, you deserve it -- you're cheapening the compliment and spoiling the Campaign for the rest of us).

What do you think will happen? At the very least, you will make that person feel better. It's very possible they will ask you, when you next meet, what motivated you to say it, and why you did it that way. Just be honest, tell them you said it because you meant it, tell them that we are all too shy about complimenting people who deserve it, and if you like, tell them that some guy on the Internet is trying to start a Whisper Campaign to get everyone who receives such a compliment to pass it on to someone they really admire and from whom they want and expect nothing in return. Don't be specific and don't try to justify it in more detail than that. If they even try to return the compliment, politely stop them and explain that the Whisper Campaign is like Tag or Pay It Forward -- no tag-backs are allowed.

I've done this three times recently -- just as a test, but sincerely in each case. I got two beaming smiles back (even before I turned to walk away). I got one look of shock or puzzlement. To my surprise they all smiled at me when I next spoke to them and none of them mentioned my compliment again. This was better than I expected -- no thank you's and no awkward follow-ups to deal with. Were they too embarrassed to bring it up? Did they think I had temporarily lost my senses and want to spare me embarrassment? Or did it just work -- make them feel better, and possibly rub off by giving them the courage to pass on compliments to others? Since they never asked about it again, I couldn't formally start the Campaign with them, but I kinda think it has worked anyway.

If you try it, please let me know how it works for you. We may not start a meme, but maybe in a small way we'll make the world a little better, a little happier, a little more honest.

5:33:30 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2005 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 01/06/2005; 6:35:17 AM.



SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World



leaf THINKING OF MOVING TO CANADA?
(immigration info blog)


Technorati Cosmos


Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Subscribe to this blog by
Add to My Yahoo!

.
.
.
.
.


Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.





WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.