 A
contrast between a book on starting your own socially and
environmentally responsible business by a British entrepreneur, and my
own book on the same subject.
I'm reading Neil Crofts' book Authentic Business, which is entirely consistent with, yet utterly different from, my own book Natural Enterprise.
Part of the difference is cultural -- Neil is British, and his
recommendations are designed for a UK/European business climate that is
less ruthless but also less historically entrepreneurial than it is
here in North America.
Neil's book is more traditional than mine in several areas as a result:
his recommendations for organizational structure (we both recommend
unincorporated partnerships, but there is some hierarchy in his, none
in mine), financing (my approach is more organic than his), and he
acknowledges that stress and hard work are an inevitable part of
entrepreneurship (I don't).
But in some important areas his recommendations are almost identical to
mine: He proposes creating a Constitution for your business instead of
a Business Plan; I call it a Charter of Principles.
Both our books stress integrity and responsibility to the community, to
society and the environment, and to yourself. Both books talk about the
importance of the community as more than just a source of customers.
Both books talk about the importance of business alliances. Both books make decision-making a consensus process (Neil advocates use of Open Space processes). Both books stress viral marketing as the best way to make your business known.
The difference between the books that is most interesting to me is the determination of what the business will be. In this area, I am quite pragmatic -- you need to start by carefully researching and finding a need
that the market isn't already addressing (and make sure you know why).
My section on Expectations talks about finding the intersection between
what you want to do, what you're good at doing, and what there's a need
for. To Neil, what you want to do trumps the other two -- he is more a
believer than I am that if you're passionate about wanting to do
something, you will find an audience, and you'll pick up the skills (or
partners with the skills) that are necessary to make the business
viable.
Here are the questions he suggests you ask to determine What you want to do:
- When do you feel at your most motivated?
- When do you get lost in activity or thought and lose all track of time?
- When do you feel alive, focused and engaged?
- What is the common thread between smiling at the rain,
enjoying the earth in your hands, playing a sumptuous feast and playing
with your child?
- What is the focus of all your 'flow' activities, the pivot around which they turn, the outcome to which they all drive?
- What is your non-negotiable dream, so precious that so far you have told no one about it for fear it will be compromised?
He says you should write this down, and discuss it with as many people
as possible, starting with those you trust, until it is crafted into a
repeatable catch phrase, Your Purpose. Then whenever anyone asks What
You Do, you instead tell them Your Purpose. And you build from there,
using the advice in the book until Your Purpose becomes your
successful, 'authentic' business.
 My
approach is to start by identifying needs, and then decide which ones
you are passionate about filling (and competent to fill). I know my
friend Rob Paterson is in Neil's camp on this -- his advice to someone
who knows their Purpose is to be a rock guitarist to spend every spare
second being a rock guitarist, practicing until you're great at it, and
not waste time pursuing a general education or a bunch of fall-back
options. Same thing if you're an athlete, or an artist.
I have no doubt that if you want to be successful in one of these
overcrowded and fiercely competitive fields, you have to go at it with
that single-mindedness. But I don't think most of us are that exclusive
in defining our Purpose. My guess is that for most of us, there's at
least one Purpose that sits in the intersection of What's Needed, What
You're Good At and What You Love. I think what Neil is saying is that,
on the chart at right, Your Purpose is whichever of the activities in
intersections 1, 2, 3 or 4 you feel most
drawn to. I think most people would be happier, and probably more
successful, doing activities in intersection 3, since they wouldn't
have to wait for a market, or kill themselves practicing to be good at
them. But a lot of us can't find anything in intersection 3. I would
agree that it's a cop-out to do things in intersection 5 (the space
most of us, alas, work in).
So it comes down, for most of us, to a decision: We can work like hell
to try to take activities in intersection 2 and move them to
intersection 3 -- though it's really tough to create
a need, or even get an unrecognized need recognized (that's where I'm
at right now). And opportunities in intersection 4 are even tougher
(and take courage) to find, though they're probably easier to move to
intersection 3 (practice, practice, practice). As a result, too many of
us spend our lives doing jobs we hate in intersection 5, and we fill
the empty place inside with hobbies in intersection 1 or (if we're
good) intersection 2.
My sense is that it's easier to keep searching for opportunities in
intersection 3, and, if that proves fruitless for too long, finding
something in intersection 4 and working hard at it. This is hard work
that requires great courage and enterprise, but books about people who have found
great happiness in their lives are almost all stories of this type of
journey. You have nothing to lose but your chains.
What do you want to do?
|
MADE IN CANADA
trust your
instincts 
