Lately
I've been having a lot of sidebar discussions with readers about
finding that way to make a living at the intersection of What You Love
(your passion), What You're Good At (your gift), and What's Needed (your purpose). Knowing your Genius
(where your gift and passion intersect -- areas 2 & 3 in the above
chart) is helpful in providing focus -- it helps you to set aside
self-indulgences (things you love but are not acknowledged as very good
at by others) and unfulfilling options (things you're acknowledged as
very good at, but don't really have any passion for).
That may
not be enough, however, to get you identifying area 3 opportunities --
or, as Dick Richards puts it, getting your genius "on purpose". If
you're like me, you can find lots
of things in area 2 (like writing fiction, for a lot of people) but
nothing in area 3. I've said that finding the opportunities in area 3
probably requires us to get away from our comfort zone, our regular
routine, what we know, and explore some areas that appeal to us but which are uncharted territory. Volunteering is one way to do that. Travel is another.
But here's another idea: Instead of starting with what you think you might want to do, what about starting with who you'd like to do it with? My top advice to aspiring entrepreneurs is don't try to start a business yourself.
The biggest problem with navel-gazing around the chart above is that it
inevitably starts you thinking about working alone, doing it all
yourself. Maybe
the perfect work for you is working as a partner in an enterprise that
does things that are wildly beyond your personal competencies and even
knowledge, but draws on your skills and passion in ways that are
essential to the enterprise.
So suppose you start by
answering the question: Of all the people I know and think I would like
to know, who would I most like to work with?
Then maybe you need to think about some possibilities of work that you
might want to do with them. Or maybe not -- maybe the next step is just
to call them up and say:
"I've
decided I would like to work with you. I think together we would be a
force to be reckoned with. We have some complementary strengths and
interests, and I think the chemistry between us would be good. I have
no idea what we would do, but my instincts tell me whatever it was it
would be successful, and a lot of fun. What do you think of the idea of
getting together and talking it over?"
Scary thought, perhaps. Imagine me
getting together with some other people I know who have ideas and
energies for making Canada sustainable within a generation, and then us
writing a note to David Suzuki suggesting that we want to work with him,
when his site says severely there are "no openings" in his
organization. What if the people you'd like to work with are already
working for someone else, seemingly happy or at least committed to
their current jobs? What if you don't even know who you might like to make a living with -- where and how do you look?
Think of it like looking for any other kind
of partner -- a boyfriend/girlfriend, or just asking for a date. Yeah,
we all know "the best ones are already taken", but that doesn't mean
they aren't looking for something better, something that fills that
empty place inside. I think you'd be surprised how many people working
hard at respectable jobs would be flattered, and perhaps very interested, in exploring opportunities that could let them find the work at the intersection of their passion, gift and purpose.
And as long as you're just sitting there, what harm would it do to ask? The worst that could happen is they'll say 'no'.
And
if they say 'yes', then what? Then you change the task from finding how
your (singular) passion and gift can find its purpose, to finding how
your (plural) passions and
collective gifts can find their purpose, together. This is a more
complex task, but if it were easy we would all be doing it intuitively.
Its complexity is the reason most of us are doing work in area 5
(unhappily), area 2 (unsuccessfully), or area 4 (incompetently), and
working with people we are indifferent to, or worse. When we wait for
others to take the initiative, to 'offer us' a job, we either wait
forever, or settle for much less than we had hoped for.
I've written
about several techniques that can be used by groups to grapple with
complex problems, but they're mostly designed for larger groups.
Assuming your group of potential co-venturers probably has between 4
and 10 people, some modification of this approach may be needed (especially if you haven't even identified some of the people for the group). I'm
going to talk with some people (including some people I wouldn't mind
making a living with) about this, and suggest a methodology, or at
least an approach, in a future article.
In the meantime, if
you've done this, or have some ideas how to do it, please let me know.
And tell me what you think is the right size group for imagining and
giving birth to a new enterprise -- small enough to let each partner
"get her genius on purpose" (and not end up creating more dreaded area
2, 4 or 5 jobs), yet large enough to have legs. |
MADE IN CANADA
trust your
instincts 
