I
slept in today. Or, rather, I lay in bed, listening to the birds,
smelling the Spring air, daydreaming, thinking about what I would write
about today, trying to shut out of my mind all the other things I 'had
to do'. As a seasoned procrastinator, I knew that when those other
things became urgent enough, I would haul my ass out of bed and get to
them.
There is method to this madness. The decision on What To
Do Next is the one we are most practiced at, and if we don't get very
good at it, we end up making a mess of our lives. I thought about the
things from my Getting Things Done
list. The list isn't that long, and most of what's on it has been there
awhile and is etched in my memory), I thought about the ones I would
try to get accomplished today. In the order I will probably start
working on them they are:
- Daily blog post (2-3 hrs)
- Batch of fruit smoothies (1/2 hr)
- 5k run (3/4 hr including warm-up/down and shower)
- Lawn work (1.5 hrs)
- Clear up some of my horrific backlog of e-mail and blog comments responses (15 hrs)
- Two
proposals for jobs/contracts that I'd really like to do but which I
think unlikely to succeed, plus one proposal I think likely to succeed
but that I'm not that keen on (20 hrs)
- Hard drive backup (1-2 hrs)
I know myself pretty well. I will accomplish #1, #2, either #3 or #4 (the other will get done tomorrow), and a part of #5 or #6. Eight hours' 'work' in total. I'll reward myself by reading or listening to music this evening.
But what subconscious criteria did I use to make these decisions? And how did I decide not to do anything today about any of the other 35 items on my GTD list, which include:
- Research
on vegetable proteins, towards inventing non-animal food proteins that
would taste just like meat and dairy products and deliver the same
nutrition, and hence obsolesce factory farms
- Research on intentional communities, towards eventually starting one
- Pulling together another complete chapter of The Natural Enterprise
- Writing more of my novel The Only Life We Know
- Research on podcasting technology, so I can finally get started on Blog Hosted Conversations
- Phone calls to resurrect my AHA! Learning & Discovery project
- Updating my blog Table of Contents and blogroll
In
the spirit of my recent posts on self-experimentation, I tried to come
up with a quantitative measure of the factors I would have considered
in making these decisions to see what 'rules' I was using for deciding
what to do next. The factors included:
L = How much I like doing these things
G = How good I am at doing these things (or how good they are for me)
N = How much this work is needed by someone other than me
A = How much this work is appreciated by someone other than me
These
factors correspond to the three circles above, reflecting our Passion,
our Gift and our Purpose, which to some extent determine how we
ultimately 'choose' to make a living. The critical factors in my
Getting Things Done list (in deciding what to do next) are:
U = How urgent it is that this work get done today
I = How important it is to me, ultimately, that this task or project get accomplished eventually
E = How easy it will be (will I be in the right place with the right people, energy & tools) to do this today
Time
demand (how long it will take) is also a factor, but long tasks can
always be broken up into shorter ones if they meet all the other
criteria. What's more, I will also do a whole bunch of other small,
short tasks today, that won't ever make it to the list. So while I
didn't want to lose track of time demand, I didn't include it as a
factor.
I looked at the 14 tasks that I had decided to do (or
not do) today, and assigned them a score (2=high, 1=moderate, 0=low)
for each of the seven factors above. I added in 'reading and listening
to music' as task #15, because that's what I know I will do this evening. Here's what the scores looked like:
| Task | L | G | N | A | U | I | E | | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | | 9 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | | 10 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | | 11 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 13 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
I
already suspected that these seven factors didn't have equal 'weight'
in the decision on what I will do next. It isn't as simple as adding up
the totals for each row and picking the largest total. But I was
surprised to discover how simple the rule was for determining what I would do today:
If U=2, do it today. If (U+E)>1, do it today if time permits. If (U+E)<2, defer it to tomorrow.
This
may only be true for me. If you're sufficiently anal to try the above
exercise for yourself, I'd be interested in your findings. If it is
true, that we do what's urgent or easy, and defer everything else, this has some sobering implications. It means we don't (until/unless it becomes urgent or easy)
do what we most like doing, or what's needed by others, or even what
ultimately on our deathbeds we will consider our most important
accomplishments.
The art of procrastination is pushing off
difficult tasks (i.e. E=0) until they become urgent (i.e. U=2). That
can require some considerable rationalization, and even some dread as U
moves from 0 to 1 and then inexorably to 2. Thinking about some of the
all-nighters and 16-hour-days I've pulled, they were usually situations
where there was one large task, or a whole bunch of smaller ones, all
with U=2 and no tomorrow. Of course it would be logical to see these
coming and plan your time so that you didn't face that crisis, but then
we're not logical, are we?
Some of you may wonder why I consider
my daily blog post (task #1) to be urgent. I'm not sure of the answer
to that, but I know I really sweat if I miss a day, and I rarely do,
even if there are other urgent tasks on the agenda. Likewise, you might
argue that if the blog (task #1) is urgent, then the related blog
comment responses and e-mails (task #5) are urgent as well. But e-mail
is one of those perverse tasks that can actually become less
urgent if you procrastinate and put it off. People will eventually give
up expecting a response. When I do get my e-mails and blog comment
responses up to date, then it become urgent to keep them that way. But sometimes, like now, I relapse. I'm only human.
So
what use is all this? I'm not sure if it makes me feel better about
myself (I'm just being who I am), or worse (that string of N=0 for
everything I will do today makes me look awfully selfish). If it's
true, though, at least for procrastinators, what could we do to increase the sense of urgency or ease,
for the things that make us happy, for the things we're good at, for
the things that are needed or at least appreciated by others, for
important things, so that they actually get done? Before blogs came
along, writing a daily column and engaging with hundreds of people on
the issues it covers would have been impossible. Then, the 2-3 hours we
now spend blogging were spent doing other urgent or easy things -- in
my case mainly wasting time watching TV or reading newspapers. By
increasing the ease of writing and sharing your ideas with others,
blogs and other social network tools have arguably enabled us to make
'better' use of our time.
I've suggested before that the best
way to make a difficult (E=0) but important (I=2) job easier (increase
E to 1) is to break it down into manageable tasks, or to collaborate
with others and share the load. That sleight-of-hand works sometimes,
but often we can still see how difficult the whole task is, and if it's
not urgent (U=0) that still won't be enough to get it done.
If
we suddenly discover we only have a few months to live, then doing all
the important things (I=2), the needed things (N=2), the appreciated
things (A=2), the things that make us happy (L=2), immediately becomes
urgent (U=2), and then we do
these things (if we can). Why should it take such a horrible revelation
to make us start doing the things that make us happy, make us follow
our passion, do what we were arguably meant to do? Just as the Shangri-La Diet
'fools' our bodies to believe we are less hungry than we really are, is
there a trick that could 'fool' our minds to believe that everything
that makes us happy is urgent? Living every day as if it were our last
is a nice homily, but how could we actually learn, or trick ourselves,
to do it? To start doing the things that are not 'merely' urgent?
Or
are we so accustomed to urgent tasks being onerous and unpleasant that
if the things that make us happy were suddenly urgent, they wouldn't
make us happy anymore anyway?
|
MADE IN CANADA
trust your
instincts 
