Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.
In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.




June 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  
May   Jul


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >






Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  June 28, 2006


broken eggshell
Before I get into this, yet another self-indulgent post, and drive most of my readers elsewhere, I wanted to tell you that, as poor as I am at responding to comments and e-mails, I read every single one, promptly and perhaps a bit obsessively. I should probably write fewer articles and correspond more, but I am who I am, so I probably won't. But though I may not communicate it well, I am listening to you, dear readers. Don't give up on me.

On a similar note, several readers have suggested that those that stumbleupon this blog currently get told (in the blog's subtitle) what it's about, but not why I write it, and that it's a bit confusing and disorienting to those who come here to read a business article, say, then find a rant about economics, then a poem, and then an essay on environmentally responsible living. So I've added a second sentence to the blog's subtitle, which I hope will make this blog's purpose (and apparent incoherence) a bit more understandable.

And a caveat: This post is heavy, even grim. It's autobiographical, and a partial explanation for my pessimism. If that rubs you the wrong way, then please don't bother reading it. And if you do, keep the psychobabble and complaints to yourself. You've been warned.

I've received a few e-mails lately that say I seem to be struggling on this blog to get past some obstacle, that I seem to be churning over a lot of the same ground, pushing myself to decide something, do something, take something in a new direction. As I've acknowledged, I have been under a lot of stress lately, but I don't think the angst in recent posts can be attributed to that. Perhaps my recent habit of running 100 laps around the track in my back yard to end up substantially where I started is an allegory for my whole life. I'm a slow learner, making the same mistakes over and over until finally something makes it so obvious even I can't fail to 'get it'.

More than anything else I am impatient with myself, even more than I am impatient with the world. That's futile, but that's me. As you'll know if you've hung around here much, I'm not a great believer in our capacity for self-improvement. Capacity for learning, yes, but not transcendence. I'm a cynic, but I think believing we can change ourselves is just self-delusion. We do what we must, and learning helps us discover what we must do. We can change what we do. We can even learn to expand our capacities, alter our perceptions and our conceptions. But that doesn't change who we are. Each of us is, after all, a chemical stew, a bag of organisms self-organized for these organisms' self-perpetuation, and which evolved their brain for that purpose as a commons, a collective communication and memory device. It is they, not 'we', who are in charge of who 'we' are.

I was going to write this post in the first person plural, about who we are and what our society (i.e. we, plural) has done to us. But I concluded that such a projection would be presumptuous. Who am I, a bag of organisms self-organized for their self-perpetuation, to presume to know who someone else 'is', or what our society has done to that person -- to their bag of organisms? What I perceive as other people are, after all, merely figments of reality, pale, inadequate representations conjured up by my organisms' brain to 'make sense' of their external world. We are all, in fact, utterly, terrifyingly alone. To presume to know anything about someone else is a preposterous arrogance.

So I am writing the rest of this instead in the first person singular, a smaller conceit. I have this intuitive suspicion that the rest of humanity is, mostly, as damaged as I am, but my evidence is purely circumstantial, subjective, unprovable.

In addition to being incessantly impatient, I am also sorry. Sorry for all the people I have hurt and disappointed. I have hurt people because I am, as I say in my blog bio, insensitive, and I have disappointed people mostly because I learn so slowly, I miss the point. I wasn't paying attention. I didn't catch your meaning. "I am a child. I last a while", as Neil Young put it. No stamina. Living in a dream world.

When I was young, I felt my emotional sensitivity slipping inexorably away, and I knew I would be, to all intents, emotionally dead before I reached the age of 25. I saw that death of emotion and sensitivity everywhere. 'Old' people made me shudder, pathetic, empty creatures hollowed out, zombies. Even in children I saw it being crushed, as they learned to play civilization's brutalizing survival game. I watched children learn fear, learn to lie, learn to impose suffering on others, from insects to the weaker kids in the schoolyard. I watched as they became everybody else. I watched them become damaged, broken, and then die. And, not being strong, I died with them. I killed myself before they could get to me.

I watched the adults, oblivious to all this, apparently already dead but still going through the motions, still pretending to feel, like those who have lost limbs still claim to feel something in the empty space where the limb once was. Not a takeover by emotionless aliens, just a slow decline, a gradual loss, a compensation. I never wanted to fall that far. I wanted to die physically long before I reached that sad state.

My friends at the time, of course, thought this was seriously deranged, and outrageously judgemental. One of them went so far as to say I was simply projecting my own growing emotional debility and insensitivity on others, and that it was I, not them, who needed help. He said that I had isolated myself from my feelings as a defence mechanism, and had masked and excused that isolation with the pretension of intellectual superiority.

At that time I was in love, far more deeply in love than I had ever been or probably have since. It was a desperate and consuming love. I attempted to cache all my remaining emotion in her, and, to some extent she did the same. We wound a cocoon around ourselves to try to keep all the hurt inflicted by the rest of the world away.

It was a brilliant fiction. I had invented, in her, the personification of all the ideals left in my heart. We would escape together. We would transcend this brutal and beaten world. We would save each other.

What a horrible burden to impose on another person! She did her best, as the object of my fierce and impossible affection, to live up to this expectation. I am not sure what she wanted or expected of me in return. I was too deluded by my invention of her to pay much attention to the real her, or her needs and desires.

I am sorry for what I did to her, for how I let her down. I am sorry for what I did to all the others I have hurt and let down out of reckless insensitivity and uncompromising idealism. I should be made to wear a hazard warning around my neck.

I still haven't learned. I still expect too much of myself. Always over-promising and under-delivering. Not very becoming. What I do now, if I were honest with myself, is just filling the emptiness, passing the time. Having gone through the emotions, now I am just numbly going through the motions. I am the Dead Shaman, still reciting the words whose meaning I have long ago forgotten.

I keep having this dream where I meet a young woman, pretty, athletic, eyes wet with tears of pain and love and longing, who persuades me that the best possible life consists of making love all the time, stretching it out so it fills every waking moment, until time and space lose their meaning. In the dream we never get bored of this; indeed, it feeds on itself so we want more and more. This is, of course, my subconscious re-enactment of the cocoon. The Box. Everything else has died, but the dream, the ideal, lives on, relentless. Pure madness.

I'm convinced we were not meant to live the way we live in this pathetic, civilized society. Somehow I know this, instinctively, but I just keep playing along, dreaming of a way out, and doing what I must. Going around and around, repeating the same mistakes, playing a role in the movie that is my life, though I am now no more really alive than the images on the movie screen. Such brilliant self-delusion. I have become a figment of my own reality.

I watch myself perform, as if I were still, really, here. But if you stop making believe with me, buying the illusion, just for a moment, and look closely, you can see -- look! -- all that is there is an empty shell.


Graphic is from the website of Synergy Communications, a UK company.

2:08:53 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2006 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 01/07/2006; 1:42:13 PM.

SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

Click to see the XML version of this web page.
Subscribe to this blog by

Email:

Add to My Yahoo!

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Technorati Cosmos
Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.


I'm listening to:

Visit the David Suzuki Foundation




WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.