Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.
In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.




July 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Jun   Aug


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >






Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  July 10, 2006


child in rain
I often read arguments about the ability or inability of humans to change. They generally fall into two categories, depending on their proponent's worldview:
  1. Humans can change quickly because we are no longer constrained by our bodies and by natural evolution. What makes us 'us' now is our cultural evolution, not our biological one. Freed from 'natural' restrictions, we can change in a heartbeat. We can accomplish anything. Mind over matter. Imagination trumps mere reality. We can reach the stars, we can live forever. We can create technologies, extensions of our brains, that transcend all 'real'-world limits. We just need to want to do it, and it will be done.
  2. People don't change. We're still living with (and in) hardware, our bodies, that control most of what we are and what we do and which evolve infinitesimally slowly. Only 18 of the 16 million bits of information our bodies process each second are conscious. It doesn't matter that our brains have allowed us to establish more complex cultures than those of other species. We continue to be preoccupied with the needs of the moment. We do what we must, then we do what's easy, then we do what's fun. There is no time left for anything else. We can't even grasp real complexity, let alone control it.
I'm not sure there's any reconciling these two views, though there seem to be lots of people determined to try. For years I was a fence-sitter on this issue, unwilling or unable to make up my mind. Recently I've come down squarely in the second, less popular camp. That's not to say I couldn't be convinced to change my mind. But it jibes better both with my understanding of history and with my instincts.

I remember sitting in a dentist's waiting room many years ago and watching three generations of a Chinese-Canadian family. The grandparents spoke no English, dressed traditionally, and seemed bewildered and distraught about the world. The grandchildren spoke only English, dressed in definitive Canadian branded clothing, and seemed able to take anything in stride. The parents, caught in the middle, had to translate for their own families. They struck me as simply coping, dealing with the needs of the moment. To the grandparents, their grandchildren were utterly alien, incomprehensible.

I've seen this again and again over the years, and I now closely observe my own grand-daughters for evidence of how able new generations are to make leapfrog changes that any one individual, no matter how long her lifetime, could not. I recall in my youth arguing with my father (himself a progressive, all his life) about his generation's inability to change. I told him I didn't trust anyone over thirty, and that it was time for 'the establishment' to get out of the way of the momentous change we were destined to bring about in a new, loving, peaceful Earth.

Come gather 'round people wherever you roam, And admit that the waters around you have grown
And accept it that soon you'll be drenched to the bone. If your time to you is worth savin'
Then you better start swimmin' or you'll sink like a stone, For the times they are a-changin'.

Come writers and critics who prophesize with your pen, And keep your eyes wide the chance won't come again
And don't speak too soon for the wheel's still in spin, And there's no tellin' who that it's namin'.
For the loser now will be later to win, For the times they are a-changin'.

Come senators, congressmen please heed the call, Don't stand in the doorway don't block up the hall
For he that gets hurt will be he who has stalled. There's a battle outside and it is ragin'.
It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls, For the times they are a-changin'.

Come mothers and fathers throughout the land, And don't criticize what you can't understand
Your sons and your daughters are beyond your command. Your old road is rapidly agin'.
Please get out of the new one if you can't lend your hand, For the times they are a-changin'.

The line it is drawn the curse it is cast, The slow one now will later be fast
As the present now will later be past. The order is rapidly fadin'.
And the first one now will later be last, For the times they are a-changin'.


Dylan wrote that over 40 years ago, and my father's argument that it had all been said before, generation after generation, yet we kept making the same mistakes over and over, fell on deaf ears. He just didn't understand, I thought. This is something new. And now, nearly 40 years later, I have become my father. And we are still making the same mistakes, over and over.

My Genius is Imagining What's Possible. It's a useful and interesting talent. But I don't confuse what's possible with what's likely. It's possible that a meteor will hit the Earth tomorrow. It's possible that some benign alien species will arrive tomorrow and fix all the world's problems for us. But I'm not counting on it, in deciding what to do next and what to do in the future. It's possible that humanity and technology will transcend the looming crisis facing us, and it's interesting to imagine that happening. But it's science fiction stuff, escapism, denial, a distraction from reality, from the real work facing us here, now.

Back in the 1960s, we did what we had to do. We shook an intolerant, war-mongering, fearful culture to its foundations. We ended the war. We challenged everything. We tried some bold and optimistic experiments.

But in the end, we changed nothing. Our twin religions of humanism and technology, it turned out, were not enough to make us, and our culture, over into something we, and it, were not.

So now I'm a skeptic about our ability to change. I recognize its imperative. I can imagine and appreciate its possibility. And I think about the leapfrogs that were made, from the generation of my grandfather, an enlightened and conservative depression-era survivor (and, like me, a bird-watcher); to the generation of my father, a progressive and an explorer who is still today generous to a fault; to my generation; to that of my lovely children, utterly caught up, like the middle generation of that Chinese-Canadian family in the dentist's office, with the immediate needs of the moment, raising their own families in a deeply troubled economy; to the generation of my extraordinary grand-daughters, who are learning, exploring, discovering what their world is about, and who are not yet ready for the terrible lessons I have for them about their future.

My grand-daughters' culture is as different from mine as mine was from my grandfather's and from that Chinese-Canadian family's. Yet somehow, in the ways that are important, these cultures are indistinguishable. Almost as much as 'we' are mere servants of our bodies, so too are we co-prisoners of our culture. Noam Chomsky has said that all human languages are so astonishingly similar that an alien ethnographer would have absolutely no doubt that we all came from a single ancestor. Anthropologists are flabbergasted that human groups so utterly separated by time and space have evolved such staggeringly similar cultures, quite independently. Our culture, with its local variations that cause us so much conflict, is becoming more homogeneous and undifferentiated, and hence poorer and less adaptable, less capable of complex change, every day. Rather than liberating us from doing what we must, and enabling us to do what we can and what is imaginable, our culture is instead our bodies' evolutionary servant. Our bodies evolved our brains to invent culture because without it we would have perished. To see human culture and 'consciousness' as anything more than an evolutionary survival mechanism is a colossal, collective conceit, an exercise, like belief in The Rapture, in magical thinking. As Eliot said, "Human kind cannot bear very much reality".

So we go on doing what we must. Rising and groaning and going to work. Sublimating our dreams and intuitions and imaginations. Looking after the needs of the moment. Invading Iraq and tomorrow Iran to feed the inextinguishable hunger for the 'food' that nourishes our fragile bodies and keeps us in the evolutionary gene pool. Distracting ourselves to death with useless information and desperate consumption and flimsy entertainments. Exploding in numbers and despoiling and impoverishing the Earth. Generation after generation, being what we are, and doing what we do.

The answer is, ironically, not striving for impossible, collective change, but rather becoming more truly human. Connecting better, more authentically to each other and to nature. Learning everything we can; learning to be useful, to be a part. Becoming more aware, more sensual, more instinctive, more generous, more in touch with 'our' bodies and hence ourselves. Taking delight in small pleasures. Living on the Edge. Slowing down and paying attention and living in the moment, undistracted. Refusing to be being everyone else in our culture.

That will not save us, but it will give our lives meaning and purpose. In the end, I think, that is all there is, and all that can be asked of us.

Image: From Danish Ministry of the Environment.

4:16:37 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2006 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 01/08/2006; 9:00:10 AM.

SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

Click to see the XML version of this web page.
Subscribe to this blog by

Email:

Add to My Yahoo!

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Technorati Cosmos
Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.


I'm listening to:

Visit the David Suzuki Foundation




WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.