Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.
In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.




October 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Sep   Nov


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >






Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  October 15, 2006


Maybe it's the season, but a lot of the relationships of people in my social circles seem to be falling apart these days. Ever since I started reading Tom Robbins' books, I have been struck by the enormous challenge that he describes in many of his books: How to make love last.

Peter SteinerA couple of years ago, Robbins wrote an article in Harper's called In Defiance of Gravity (it's also included in his book Wild Ducks Flying Backward). In it, he describes his personal experiences with near-suicidal depression, and how he was able to pull himself back from the brink of what he calls Weltschmerz (world-weariness) The trick, he said, was to rediscover playfulness, or what the Tibetan Buddhists call Crazy Wisdom -- "the wisdom that evolves when one, while refusing to avert one's gaze from the sorrows and injustices of the world, insists on joy in spite of everything".

At the time, I wrote this about Robbins' article:

Robbins says the epitome of Crazy Wisdom is the cat. I have seen cats of all ages, cats of amazing wisdom and style who otherwise show themselves to be cunning and astonishingly self-sufficient, chase a piece of string dragged by a child around the house for an hour or more, indefatigably and with enormous concentration, creativity and energy. What is the purpose of this unexpected playfulness? Is this the cat's way of discharging the tension and anxiety that preoccupies her more sombre and sober moments? Is it her way of teaching the child (or the adult, since I get great pleasure from such games, at least until some intrigued child coaxes the string away from me to learn more about this magic trick) important lessons about instinct, about reflexes, about strategy, about the need for play, and a hundred other lessons we are too besotted with Weltschmerz to appreciate?

Perhaps that rediscovery of playfulness is also the secret to making love last. Expecting us to love one person forever, come what may, is demanding a lot of us, and arguably unnatural. Popular music is full of references to this challenge:





You're here, what if you weren't, what would have happened to me?
That candle, unburnt, is history
One thing I guess this place would be a mess
For my standards at best are undemanding, and that takes some understanding.
Still here, but what if we weren't, where'd you think I would be?
For love I have learned depends on geography
Fortune found us when all around us,
Half the couples we knew were disbanding, and that needs your understanding.
And do you know even when we disagree, and freedom holds out a hand to me
You know I would never want to be without your company.
We have reached an understanding...
-- Everything But the Girl, Understanding

But every morning I wake up and worry what’s gonna happen today
You see it your way and I see it mine but we both see it slipping away.
You know we always had each other baby; I guess that wasn’t enough.
-- The Eagles, Best of My Love

Look at us baby, up all night tearing our love apart
Aren't we the same two people who lived through years in the dark?
Every time I try to walk away something makes me turn around and stay
And I can't tell you why.
Nothing's wrong as far as I can see; we make it harder than it has to be.
-- The Eagles, I Can't Tell You Why

First you make believe I believe the things that you make believe
And I'm bound to let you down
Then it's I who have been deceiving, purposely misleading
And all along you believed in me
So we circle around one another, playing a guessing game
Strangers at this masquerade, pretending to know each other
We strain to catch a name, and never see the mistakes we must have made
-- James Taylor, BSUR

and my favourite:

How do you keep the music playing? How do you make it last?
How do you keep the song from fading too fast?
How do you lose yourself to someone and never lose your way?
How do you not run out of new things to say?
And since we're always changing, how can it be the same?
And tell me how year after year, you're sure your heart will fall apart
Each time you hear his name
I know the way I feel for you, It's now or never
The more I love the more that I'm afraid
That in your eyes I may not see forever, forever.
If we can be the best of lovers, yet be the best of friends,
If we can try with everyday to make it better as it grows
With any luck, then I suppose, the music never ends.
-- James Ingram, How Do You Keep the Music Playing?

Lots of wishful thinking but no magic secrets there. The advice we often get is not particularly encouraging: It takes a lifetime of hard work. You have to compromise, not expect too much. You need to be forgiving. You need to give space.

When I was younger, breakups were tempestuous, and usually provoked by an indiscretion. But now, its just as if the force of gravity that held couples together has been repealed, and they're just drifting apart. Relationships are ending not with a bang, but with a whimper.

Perhaps this is nothing new. Maybe it's been going on for generations and its just that, when you reach a certain age, you start to notice it, you see through the thin veneer and pick up on the signals and tones of estrangement.

The pragmatist in me says that you don't try to "keep the music playing" -- when the music stops, you acknowledge its end to your dancing partner and move on. The idealist in me says that the problem isn't trying to make feelings of love with one person last, it's that we don't love enough people throughout our lives so that, when one love wanes, there are dozens of others to keep us loving. Because I do believe that without love we are nothing.

If we loved more people, freely, openly, would we feel less grief at the loss of love from one person? I'm not so sure. We might, however, be able to cope with that loss better, because we would see and feel love as an abundant and indefatigable resource. In our terrible modern world where love is treated as a scarce resource, jealously guarded and limited to one person at a time (and in some societies, to one person in a lifetime), its loss is inevitably more profound in its impact on us.

Here's an analogy: People with enormous financial wealth don't worry much about losing a small part of it. People with no wealth at all, when they acquire something briefly and easily, don't worry about losing it -- easy come, easy go. It's those people who have just a little wealth, acquired with difficulty and all tied up in one thing, who feel the greatest stress and grief and sense of loss when it suddenly disappears. Is it the same with 'emotional wealth'? Is that why some people who have lost love become unable, or refuse, to love again?

What do you think? How do you keep the music playing? Is more playfulness the answer, and if so, how do we engender that? Is it even important to keep the music playing? And do you see "half the couples you know disbanding" (disengaging psychologically if not legally), or is it just me?

Cartoon: By Peter Steiner from The New Yorker, in the Cartoon Bank.

5:40:03 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2006 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 03/11/2006; 3:25:14 PM.

SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

Click to see the XML version of this web page.
Subscribe to this blog by

Email:

Add to My Yahoo!

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Technorati Cosmos
Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.


I'm listening to:

Visit the David Suzuki Foundation




WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.