Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.
In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.




November 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    
Oct   Dec


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >






Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  November 15, 2006


Jon Stewart Richard AvedonKathy Sierra's post on how to start a presentation or novel is inspired, but it's not for everyone. As I mentioned in my last post, people read, listen and pay attention for two reasons: to be informed, or to be entertained. If you can do both, you're laughing (and more talented than I am). What's important is that you do at least one of the two: inform, or entertain.

Kathy's six elements of an entertaining presentation, book, film or story are right on: provoke, empathize, amuse, surprise, suspend, and engage the emotions. This is especially true for fiction, but it also works for non-fiction. The most successful business gurus do more than inform -- they rock the room. Love him or hate him, Michael Moore entertains an audience while he informs them. So does Jon Stewart.

But suppose you're Al Gore rather than Jon Stewart -- what do you do? If you're wise, you do three things:
  • You make it clear that you're there to inform, rather than entertain. Those seeking entertainment will stay away, instead of falling asleep or walking out.
  • You inform your audience brilliantly.
  • You do some little things that are unambitiously entertaining -- include a relevant cartoon or video or a funny story (and rehearse it so it is funny).
From years on the speaker's circuit, getting slowly better at it (and occasionally hitting a home run) I've learned I am not an entertaining speaker, but I can be a competently informative one. So here's my advice to those who have something important to say, but aren't the wittiest at saying it. Consider it a sequel to Kathy's post:
  1. Do your homework. Know your subject extremely well. Rehearse with people who are hard to dazzle with new information, until they're impressed. 
  2. Pick your venues, know your audience. If the conference is full of bored people who are only there because it's a company-paid jaunt, pass. No point being knowledgeable if the audience isn't interested in learning. Talk to them before your presentation to find out what they know and what they care about.
  3. Give 'em lots of new stuff. I always have twice as much new, interesting material as I expect to be able to present. I don't let on that I have a lot of slides that I can show (I rarely get to all of them). I put most of the best stuff at the beginning, and save the very best to last, skipping stuff in the middle that won't fit. I move at a fairly fast clip, but if people have questions, I let them come. 
  4. Make sure your information is practical and useful. Some abstract new concept may be interesting to you, and a few in the audience, but most of us are looking for something we can apply in our jobs or our lives. If it's not obvious, it's even OK to suggest to people how the information you're conveying can be used. If there are free downloads or other 'takeaway' tools you can point them to that can help them use the information, that's even better.
  5. No bullet point slides. Interesting, relevant pictures, graphics, screen-shots. Give the audience something to look at, but force them to listen to you at the same time.
  6. Give 'em lots of handouts. Not the entire text of your presentation -- other stuff that adds to it. Reading lists. Related articles. Copies of especially good graphics. Hotlinks to sites with further information and tools and demos they can try out on their own time.
  7. Go with the flow. In a small group, if they're really engaged, my objective is to turn the presentation into a group conversation. After giving them some new/interesting information at the start of the presentation (and handing out a bunch more) I'll toss out a question and, if there's a lot of discussion, I'll just moderate and facilitate, keeping it going as long as there's energy around it. Sometimes the audience has more to teach each other than I have to offer them. Those who don't want to participate can read the stuff I've handed out. In a larger group, I leave time and room for a couple of interesting diversions (which, if I've done my homework, I can usually anticipate and plan for). I ask the audience if they're interested in the tangents I've planned for, and if I get a lot of nods, I'll go there -- it's a way of making a large audience feel involved in the flow. If I get no response, I'll stay with the original agenda.
  8. Use multimedia. Relevant visualizations and short video clips that make your point make a nice break from the static. Dave Snowden showed the famous Daniel Simons "basketball" observation skills video last week, and people were talking about it for the rest of the conference. I showed the India traffic video to demonstrate complex adaptive systems.
  9. Speak enthusiastically and passionately. This can be hard if, like me, you don't sleep well in hotels and on planes and you're a bit weary when you step up to the podium. Or if you're not used to speaking and are nervous. But it's important. If you don't sound interested or intrigued by your subject, you can't expect your audience to be.
  10. Tell stories -- about how the information you're giving has been practically applied, or (if you prefer war stories to success stories) how it should have been applied. Stories from your own experience are best, but second-hand stories are OK too.
As Kathy says, you need to get the audience hooked from the beginning, so hit them with something really interesting right from the start. But keep another 'wow' for the very end, just before you conclude by reiterating how useful everything you've told them could be, if they act on it appropriately.

It's worked for me, anyway -- I'm a clumsy speaker and storyteller, but I get pretty high marks, and repeat invitations, for most of my presentations. I've even had a couple of standing O's. And it only took me 50 years.

Good show, everyone.

Photo of Jon Stewart is by the late Richard Avedon, part of an unfinished collection on campaign 2004.

9:03:19 PM  trackback []  comment []

Imagine my surprise when I voted last Monday and discovered that I had to insert my ballot in an electronic tabulating machine. If the horrific lessons from the US were not enough, the government of Quebec has banned the use of these machines after last year's experience, acknowledged by the provincial government as a "fiasco" that produced results that the Chief Electoral Officer admitted did "not offer sufficient guarantees of transparency and security to ensure the integrity of the vote", seriously eroded voter confidence, took longer and cost 25% more than the paper system (that worked just fine) that it replaced. The long litany of problems with the machines included:
  • Machines misread ballots.
  • A backup plan covering all possible problems was missing.
  • The lack of paper ballots in some municipalities prevented judicial recounts.
  • Only partial testing of the voting machines took place in some instances.
I'm at a loss to understand why so many Ontario municipalities agreed to use these machines, given this experience, and given the fact there was no problem with the existing manual system, which is used (for now at least) in all federal and provincial elections and which produces fast, inexpensive, accurate, verifiable results and is the envy of most of the Western world.

There's a great Canadian blog covering this issue exclusively. The decision to use these machines in Ontario is made by the municipality -- by the local incumbent politicians, not by an independent electoral commission. These are the same municipal politicians whose election campaigns are 90% funded by real estate developers. Yet this was not even mentioned as an election issue. In Caledon, the machine were bought from Dominion Voting Systems, who also runs the website where the official results are displayed. Their website contains no information on who owns them or who their executives are, though they do list the Conservative Party of Canada as a key client.

*Sigh* We take so much for granted. The election turnout in our area was 34%. The media said nothing about electronic voting or the blatant conflict of interest of almost all the incumbents whose campaigns were substantially financed by developers -- developers who will soon be applying to these same politicians for zoning variances and other concessions to accelerate endless urban sprawl.

It's only a democracy when you have a real choice, and the necessary information to exercise it.

9:01:52 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2006 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 01/12/2006; 6:41:36 PM.

SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

Click to see the XML version of this web page.
Subscribe to this blog by

Email:

Add to My Yahoo!

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Technorati Cosmos
Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.


I'm listening to:

Visit the David Suzuki Foundation




WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.