Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.
In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.




 

  March 9, 2007


queue jeffrey palladini
According to an MIT professor, we spend 2-3 years of our life waiting in lines: in stores, at the doctor's, at the bank, at the airport, for public transport, for government services and so on. And that doesn't include the time we spend waiting in lines in our cars (in traffic jams and red lights) or on the phone ("you are number... 58 in the queue...your call is important to us...")

It is unnatural to wait in lines. That's why in some countries, people just push ahead and refuse to stay in order. It's also why people will pay money to jump the queue.

A queue created by a vendor, in person or on the phone, is the vendor's way of telling you that they believe their time is more important and valuable than yours. A doctor who overbooks and then makes you wait an hour after your scheduled appointment is sending the same message. A lineup for a social event (with bouncers ready if you misbehave) is a power trip for those who deliberately create it. Unfortunately, oligopolies can afford to treat customers this way, because they are all in cahoots to offer the same lousy, rude service to cut their costs.

Government queues, including traffic jams caused by inadequate road systems, are an attempt to be frugal with taxpayers' money, and sometimes also a deliberate barrier designed to discourage certain behaviours (e.g. driving cars) and encourage others (e.g. public transit).

Lines for service by large organizations, both public and private, are further exacerbated by bureaucracy. Small is beautiful and size creates the inevitability of queues to counter the inherent inefficiency of large organizations. Scale may reduce their cost, but it inevitably increases the customer's waiting time.

Queues are also a reflection of imaginative failure, because in most cases they are unnecessary:
  • Technologies should be able to predict and schedule staff to avoid line-ups, to advise people in advance, 24/7 from anywhere, when and where they will face delays and appropriate workarounds for them, and, when delays are unavoidable, to schedule alternative times when there will be little or no delay.
  • Processes should be redesigned to eliminate waits, which almost always cost more than the cost of improving the process.
  • Facilities should be made available so that people who must wait in a line can do other productive tasks (work or recreational) while they wait.
Such imaginative failure costs our economy billions, frequently leads to violence or accidents, and causes unnecessary stress and ultimately human illness. So why do we put up with it? Because in this world of supposedly limitless choice, there really is no choice at all. You can wait in line A or line B. And if you have a problem with that, line C starts around the corner. Don't get angry. Don't tell us how to do our job better. Just stay in line.

Painting: Queue by Jeffrey Palladini

Category: Human Nature

5:47:29 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2007 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 01/04/2007; 11:50:25 AM.

March 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Feb   Apr

SEARCH BLOG How to Save the World

Click to see the XML version of this web page.
Subscribe to this blog by
Email:
leafMADE IN CANADA leaf trust your instincts

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.


I'm listening to:

Visit the David Suzuki Foundation




WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
- original research,surveys etc.
- original,well-crafted fiction
- great finds: resources,blogs,essays, artistic works
- news not found anywhere else
- category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
- clever, concise political opinion consistent with their own views
- benchmarks,quantitative analysis
- personal stories,experiences,lessons learned
- first-hand accounts
- live reports from events
- insight:leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
- short educational pieces
- relevant "aha" graphics
- great photos
- useful tools and checklists
- précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
- fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
- constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
- 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
- requests for future posts on specific subjects
- foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
- reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
- wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
- comments that engender lively discussion
- guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.