Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.
In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.




 

  July 12, 2007


influenzaThis week I had the opportunity to attend a global conference on disaster management, one 'track' of which was focused on health emergencies. There is certainly no unanimity about what we should be doing to prepare for and cope with a future pandemic (a pandemic is an infectious disease outbreak that is both virulent -- i.e. deadly -- and highly transmissable human to human), but over the course of the conference a consensus became apparent. I think this consensus reflects a growing sense of maturity and awareness of the lessons of history and our limited ability to anticipate or predict events in complex environments.
 
Here are what I think were the twelve most important areas of expert consensus about the next pandemic:
  1. Most people cannot be expected to plan ahead or prepare for it: It is not in our nature to plan for eventualities until and unless we are convinced they are virtually certain and imminent. We can send out all the information we want on emergency preparedness and emergency kits. Most people will ignore it until it is too late.
  2. Public expectations of what government will do to prevent, mitigate and manage a pandemic are substantial, growing and largely unrealistic. This is another instance of the phenomenon of learned helplessness, and it's exacerbated by governments that are prone to overpromise things to assuage gullible voters. After Katrina, we should know better.
  3. Isolation of communities won't work: We are all too interdependent today to be able to cut our community off from the rest of the world for any length of time until a pandemic is over.
  4. Closing borders and air routes won't work: Pandemics spread very quickly and easily and use multiple alternate routes to 'work around' blockages. Short of an immediate, very early, complete shut-down of all long-distance transportation (which is impossible -- no one has the capacity to engineer this), a true pandemic will become global.
  5. Except for expert professional users, masks won't work: The use of masks and other protective equipment requires a complicated series of steps to be rigorously followed. Even health professionals, who are trained in these procedures, often miss a step and get infected.
  6. It is the duration and recurrence of a pandemic that will wreak the most havoc, not its virulence or transmissability: Pandemics can easily last 18 months or more, and can recur in 'waves' after life has almost returned to normal. We can all manage extraordinary procedures for a short time. Few of us can cope when these situations become chronic.
  7. The economic consequences of a pandemic will be much more severe than the health consequences: A pandemic will likely drastically curtail both business operations and consumer spending on non-essentials. It could precipitate a recession or even a 1930s-style depression. It is harsh to try to compare economic costs with human ones, but, as with 9/11, costs and losses in the trillions, by most people's standards, dwarf deaths in the thousands.
  8. The codependence of telecom and electrical systems poses a huge vulnerability in a pandemic: Information flows, and the continued functioning of health facilities, are critical to mitigating tragedy during a pandemic. Maintaining our telecom systems now depends on maintaining electricity -- most phones are now digital and powered by the grid. Blackouts caused by storms, sabotage or simple equipment failure will take much longer to recover from because of personnel shortages, and repairs require a functioning telecom system to report and coordinate information.
  9. The tools that will work in a pandemic are those that are (a) simple to use and maintain, (b) intuitive to understand, and (c) available at the point of use: So, for example, satellite phones will be needed when regular cell phones are disabled, but most people don't know where to get them, or how to use them, or that they only work out-of-doors. Emergency generators are hard to learn to use and require frequent proper maintenance. Antivirals need to be administered according to a strict, complicated regimen. Every complication, every extra step, reduces the effectiveness and value of tools that could otherwise save lives. And surveys indicate most people will be looking at simple sources -- TV and newspapers, not the Internet -- for pandemic information.
  10. Resilience, practice and improvisation skills are more critical than good planning in a pandemic: Redundant systems, people who have been through emergency situations or rehearsals, excellent, evidence-based decision-making skills, trained facilitators who can make effective ad hoc use of volunteers who have natural immunity, and people with the competence to adapt to quickly changing circumstances, have been shown to help in emergencies far more than having a detailed plan. Plans can't predict what will happen in complex situations, so they're only useful when scenarios play out 'according to plan', which they seldom do.
  11. Science and technology will not reduce the certainty of a pandemic: Viruses and bacteria evolve faster than science can invent ways to defeat them, and as we get better at creating antimicrobials we actually accelerate the evolution of immune microbes. We can never catch up. There will be a pandemic, and it will be soon.
  12. Antivirals and vaccines will be of limited use: Antivirals are complicated to use, have a short shelf life, have side-effects, and may not be effective against novel disease strains anyway. Vaccines take months to develop, by which time most of the damage may already have been done. Due to a phenomenon called cykotine storm, those with strong immune systems may be the most vulnerable to pandemic disease (this happened during the Spanish Flu in 1918, and happens in H5N1 poultry flu). What will most determine who lives, who gets sick and who dies is the natural immunity of each individual to the particular virus, and its virulence. And if it turns out you have natural immunity, you will be needed (see point 10).

Are you ready for this? What do you think most people will do -- panic and overload the phone lines and help lines, or stay calm and rise to the occasion?

Category: Science and Health



6:46:41 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2007 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 01/08/2007; 9:29:25 PM.

July 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Jun   Aug

SEARCH BLOG How to Save the World

Click to see the XML version of this web page.
Subscribe to this blog by
Email:
leafMADE IN CANADA leaf trust your instincts

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.


I'm listening to:

Visit the David Suzuki Foundation




WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
- original research,surveys etc.
- original,well-crafted fiction
- great finds: resources,blogs,essays, artistic works
- news not found anywhere else
- category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
- clever, concise political opinion consistent with their own views
- benchmarks,quantitative analysis
- personal stories,experiences,lessons learned
- first-hand accounts
- live reports from events
- insight:leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
- short educational pieces
- relevant "aha" graphics
- great photos
- useful tools and checklists
- précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
- fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
- constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
- 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
- requests for future posts on specific subjects
- foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
- reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
- wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
- comments that engender lively discussion
- guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.