 My favourite cartoon from the ever-provocative Ted Rall
I've been trying to figure out why some people love Michael
Moore's new movie Sicko, and others hate it. The wildly divergent
reactions, it seems, have less to do with political view and more to do
with the perceived solutions (or lack of them) to the outrageous
situation that Moore presents -- the utterly dysfunctional and
egregiously expensive and inequitable US healthcare system.
Consider some of the other outrages that the daily news inundates us with daily:
- Exxon's and Big Oil's effective lobbying of the Bush Administration
to deny and ignore global warming, and to dismantle and not enforce
environmental regulations;
- The tragedy of diseases in struggling nations causing such
misery -- easily preventable, curable or at least treatable, if only
the drugs and equipment were made affordable;
- Koch Industries (the largest private company in the US), guilty of
hundreds of horrific and deliberate environmental infractions that
would have an ordinary citizen behind bars for life, escaping with tiny
fines in out-of-court settlements orchestrated by good buddy and
campaign recipient Bush;
- The fraudulent war in Iraq, the abuse of civil liberties and other
criminal responses to the events of 9/11 which have made the world much
more dangerous and much more miserable, and left the US treasury
bankrupt;
- The obscene salaries of executives in the global corpocracy, funded
by taxpayers through the massive subsidies these corporate welfare bums
receive in return for their campaign contributions to establishment
politicians, salaries of more in a single hour than the minimum-wage
earner gets in a year, and more thanthe average struggling-nation
wage-earner gets in their short lifetime.
These stories provoke two simultaneous reactions in most people:
outrage and a feeling of impotence to do anything about them. Why would
people tell us stories that make us so angry and conflicted? Several
reasons: - Propaganda and manipulation: to instill fear and cow people into compliance with the established order;
- Laziness: it is easier to stir people up about a problem than to do something about it;
- Money or fame: outrage gets attention, with can produce ratings, fame and fortune;
- Search
for help: frustration and bafflement at not knowing what to do can
cause people to shout out for answers, to whistle-blow, or to engage in
curious gossip.
Stories that provoke helpless outrage are
infectious, viral. They spread easily and quickly. But as the audience
or storyteller, these stories have a toxic effect on us:- They make us angry and fearful,
- They instill a sense of Learned Helplessness,
- They provoke us to want to act, a willingness to do anything,
- They make us want to inure ourselves from the helpless rage, through denial or just turning away, and
- Most of all, they raise our stress level.
Not healthy. After awhile, some of us just turn it off, refuse to pay any more attention to the news.
What
should we do? While some of these stories are trumped up or
exaggerated, a lot of them are horrible truths, and ignoring them just
plays into the hands of the perpetrators and their accomplices.
A healthier, more effective response would be:
- Critically assess the information: Consider who has the most to gain from exaggerating or denying it. Ask yourself whether it makes sense. Consider the source.
- Filter out information that is unactionable:
If there's nothing you can do about it, why worry about it? There are
more than enough causes of stress in our lives without exposing
ourselves pointlessly to more.
- Tease out actions that are simple and effective:
If there is something you and others can do about it, make it simple to
act, and ensure that action will be effective. There's only so much
time for activism, so we need to use it advantageously. In my
experience, petitions rarely work. Good investigative research can
accomplish a lot (the mainstream media, with few exceptions, are too
lazy, cheap and compliant to do it, but they'll often publish it if
it's handed to them. Direct face-to-face confrontations sometimes
works. Street theatre sometimes works. Pick a strategy that's novel and
likely to get attention. If there isn't one, then it's unactionable --
in which case see rule #2.
- Don't pass on the information unless it's credible and actionable:
Gossip and rumour can be dangerous and cause suffering or litigation,
and set back your cause. And if it's unactionable, passing it on is
just stressing out other people.
- Don't mistake passing information on for action: If it's actionable, act. Pass it on after you've acted, not instead of acting. Tell people what you've done that's made a difference. Be a model.
So how would you apply these rules to Moore's new movie?
Don't go see it. There are better things to do with your time than to get stressed and frustrated about problems that have no answer.
What would it take to fix the US healthcare system? The same thing that, eventually, 'fixes' any dysfunctional complex system: crisis.
When the system gets so overwhelmed, so expensive, so broken, that it
falls apart, and there is enough of a sense of near-unanimous urgency
for creating a new one, it will happen.
A few million people outraged and feeling impotent won't be nearly enough to bring about change.
|
MADE IN CANADA
trust your
instincts 
