 A collaborative drawing by Claudia and Sergio Olivos
I've told a few stories about great collaborations on this blog. Here are a couple of them:
- A few years ago one of our
neighbours sent out invitations to a 'work bee', to repair and refinish
the century-old barn that serves today as their garage. Refreshments
were offered as inducements, but my initial reaction was reluctance:
Were we being 'Tom Sawyered' into doing someone else's work? My wife,
who has a lot more sense than I, dismissed this and volunteered us
immediately. As readers know, my lack of manual dexterity and
coordination are legendary, but I participated, learning how to do
several things I'd read about but never understood, and making up in
energy what I lacked in competence. I can't describe what an incredible
sense of accomplishment we felt, or how much sheer fun we had. Every time I drive by that barn, I say to myself with unrestrained joy: We did that!
- A
few years ago I watched our arthritic dog Chelsea sitting in the shade
in the back yard with our visiting daughter's small dog Laker. Chelsea
always enjoyed canine company but after introductions they didn't
really 'play' together, they just sat around outside (kind of like
their humans), watching the world go by. Suddenly, as I was watching,
Laker spotted a chipmunk and raised her head sharply. Within fifteen
seconds, Laker and Chelsea, who had never 'collaborated' on anything to
my knowledge, and who certainly had never individually caught any of
the abundant wildlife in our area, had together outflanked, flushed
out, cornered and trapped the chipmunk, which simply gave up, lay down
and closed its eyes. In that fifteen seconds there had been at least
fifty moves made by each of the three 'players' in the drama, a
sophisticated chess game of trial and error, signaling and tactical
adjustment. It was absolutely amazing to watch. When we pulled the dogs
away and rescued the poor chipmunk, the look of triumph and joy on the
dogs' faces was unmistakable.
How do these extraordinary
occurrences happen? Given the staggering complexity of social
environments and interrelationships, how we get attuned to each other
to work such magic with no plan?
You could not orchestrate these collaborative outcomes, these
'collective emergences', nor could you predict them, yet they are not
rare. Under the right circumstances, they are commonplace miracles: We
see them in at least five areas of human (and animal) endeavour:
- Sense-making: Working together to make sense of something, to understand, gain insight, obtain 'collective wisdom'
- Imagining: Working together to come up with ideas and possibilities
- Innovation: Working together to come up with a design, an offering, a product or service
- Creation: Working together to produce a construction or work of art or science
- Performance: Working together improvisationally to enact or invent a piece of theatre, sport, or performance art
I've
studied the collaborations that seemed to be the most successful ones,
and identified seven elements that seem to be present in most of them.
Here they are, along with some ways in which these elements can be
nurtured to increase the likelihood of a collaboration achieving
remarkable results:
- The Right People: The right number (not too many, not too few) with diversity of viewpoints, skills and knowledge. People who have a lot of practice in collaboration seem to learn how to self-select
into, to coalesce into, collaborations that work. I don't think
imposing membership on a collaborative group is effective, no matter
how well-intentioned.
- Capacity and Knowledge:
Good collaboration requires a variety of left- and right-brained
skills, gifts, talents, instincts, knowledge, and capacities such as
openness, awareness and imagination. Some of these are easy to acquire;
others are much more difficult. The more people in the group who have
these capacities, the more likely the collaboration is to succeed. You
need to urge potential members of collaborations to continuously learn
these capacities, and provide ready access to needed knowledge.
- Attitude: A
combination of passion for the subject of the collaboration, energy,
and positive enthusiasm. Great collaborations are great fun. Black hats
and those who are quick to lose attention, give up or disengage are
absolutely toxic to collaboration. Your invitation should be such that
it attracts those with the right attitude and discourages those with
negative or unhelpful ones.
- Responsibility:
This is both a personal responsibility to devote oneself to the task at
hand, and to act on the results of the collaboration appropriately when
it is over, and also a collective responsibility to the rest of the
collaborators. I've seen self-managed collaborative groups eject those
members who lack that sense of responsibility, gently but firmly.
- Mutual Respect and Trust:
Some people start with this for strangers, and only lose it if it's
betrayed, while others don't trust others until and unless that trust
is earned. What's interesting is that self-managed groups that contain
both types of people seem to work it out.
- Environment: The
best environments I've seen are natural, unconstrained places with lots
of fresh air and room to move. This, I think, is more important than a
'creative' environment (with lots of toys to play with while working)
or a technologically-rich one.
- Chemistry or Dynamic:
It's great when the chemistry of the self-selecting members works
spontaneously and powerfully. But when it doesn't, a good facilitator
can create and enable the dynamic that can compensate for a lack of
natural chemistry, enabling the group to work together effortlessly,
and making them want to.
When you think about it, these same seven elements of great collaboration could also be the seven elements of great sex.
The
collective emergence that comes out of great collaboration is worth all
the work to create the right conditions, and all the practice and
learning that are needed to make it extraordinary.
|