Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.
In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.




 

  November 8, 2007


water scarcity
Map of current water scarcities (brown) from the NYT.

What happens when you just run out of something essential for life?

This is what happened during the ice ages. We ran out of food. The age of simple gatherer-hunter cultures immediately came to an end. The result was the invention of what Richard Manning in Against the Grain calls catastrophic agriculture -- burning or flooding large tracts of land to harvest the hardy monoculture grains that appeared first as the land recovered. The process was so arduous, unreliable and miserable that we had to invent slavery and civilization to coerce people to stick with it. We do what we must, and when the ice froze us out, we had to do something radical. So we did.

Today we seem to believe that, if we run out, the answer is to import more. Simple. Run out of wood or metals? Just destabilize a bunch of faraway nations, bribe the officials, enslave the locals, poison the environment, and get the cheap wood and metals you need. Run out of oil? Just invade the Middle East and steal theirs. Run out of cheap labour? Import some, or offshore the work. Run out of money? Just print some more, and convince people it's worth something.

The problem is, none of these 'solutions' is sustainable. We've run out of countries to rip off for their wood, metals and oil. We're past the Oil Peak anyway. We've run out of third world labour to exploit, even we could still afford to ship stuff from them at $160/barrel oil. All of these quick fixes merely ratchet up the fragility of our economy and our planet, leave us less room to maneuver when our bandaid fix comes unsprung. Jim Kunstler's book The Long Emergency tells us what will happen when we run out of oil, even with ecologically disastrous substitutes -- massive tar sands mining, coal burning, and farms of nukes. It's a horrific portrait.

But while some places (like the Northern US) are going to face devastating disruption when oil runs out, other places (like the Southern US, China, India and much of the Middle East) are going to face another crisis, even earlier -- the End of Water.

Robert Sanford is a hydrologist who's studied the growing water scarcity in Southwestern Canada. It's not even on the map (above) as a water crisis site -- yet. Even worse, the Southwestern US is counting on the glaciers of Southwestern Canada to solve their growing water crisis. In a recent interview on CBC radio, Sanford said there won't be any to share.

The glaciers, which provide most of the fresh water in half the continent, are disappearing at an astonishing rate, thanks to global warming. Farmers alone have 'claims' on more river water in Southwestern Canada -- a semi-desert at the best of times -- than there is water. If all the farmers licenced to do so took out their quota, the cities of Southwestern Canada (like Calgary) would have none left. None. No water for people to drink and shower and flush. No water for industry. No water for lawns. No water for the voracious Alberta Tar Sands that will soon need ten times as much water as it already uses (plus all the natural gas in the Arctic plus energy from a farm of new nukes). None.

The consequence of simply running out of water seems unfathomable to us, in this age of hydro engineering. The problem is, we've already dammed up the rivers as much as we can. More fragility. There is no slack in the system. If Las Vegas and California's cities can't get fresh water, what will they do? Stop irrigating, so the foods that much of North America depends on can no longer be grown. Stop watering lawns and gardens, so dust and desert and massive wildfires will return. Stop all industrial and commercial activity, so the economy is plunged into prolonged recession. The situation is as bad in the Southeastern US, where Atlanta and thousand of square miles for states around, which usually get a lot of rain, are facing the worst drought in a century, leaving reservoirs dangerously low, in some cases with only days' worth of reserves left.

In every such case, and in China (where the water table is dropping so quickly -- eight to eighteen feet per year -- that farmers are killing neighbours who dig wells deeper than theirs) and India and the Middle East, you cannot solve the problem by just 'importing' water from somewhere else. Towing ice floes is the stuff of fantasy. Desalination is extremely expensive (it would make water more expensive than oil) and ecologically destructive. And if you built aqueducts, where would run them to? No one has a surplus of water. Even the Great Lakes' polluted waters are dropping at an astonishing rate.

If there is no water, you have two choices. Leave. Or die. This is what farmers did during the Great Depression, the Dust Bowl. This is what farmers by the million are doing in China and India already. This is what the people of Atlanta may soon have to do. Sooner. Or later.

Why can't we get our heads around this? The people in the suburbs of Atlanta, we hear, are perpetuating the Tragedy of the Commons problem by refusing to stop watering their lawns. Industry is rationing, but nowhere near enough. Everyone is just waiting, hoping that rain will solve the problem. There is no Plan B.

Imagine a refugee emigration from the Southern US ten times what Katrina produced. With no hope of resettlement. Imagine Las Vegas, that extravagance, as a desert ghost town. Imagine the impact on the economy. Imagine the Alberta Tar Sands, the great Western hope for a brief respite from the End of Oil, abandoned because there simply wasn't enough water. Imagine fires burning in California as steadily, endlessly as they do in Brasil, leaving millions homeless.

This of course is our problem: We can't imagine. And we refuse to let the lessons of history, and of other nations, teach us how to imagine, what if...?

Until it ceases to be a matter of what if? and becomes a question of now what?


10:17:18 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2007 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 01/12/2007; 3:05:31 PM.

November 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  
Oct   Dec

SEARCH BLOG How to Save the World

Click to see the XML version of this web page.
Subscribe to this blog by
Email:
leafMADE IN CANADA leaf trust your instincts

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.


I'm listening to:

Visit the David Suzuki Foundation




WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
- original research,surveys etc.
- original,well-crafted fiction
- great finds: resources,blogs,essays, artistic works
- news not found anywhere else
- category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
- clever, concise political opinion consistent with their own views
- benchmarks,quantitative analysis
- personal stories,experiences,lessons learned
- first-hand accounts
- live reports from events
- insight:leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
- short educational pieces
- relevant "aha" graphics
- great photos
- useful tools and checklists
- précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
- fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
- constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
- 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
- requests for future posts on specific subjects
- foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
- reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
- wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
- comments that engender lively discussion
- guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.