Yesterday I reported on my visit to Whole Village, an Intentional Community near where I live, and in that report I described briefly the principles that community is guided by in its decisions and operations.
I've heard and read about similar statements
of principles for other Intentional Communities, and wondered if it
would be possible to create a generic set of principles for such
communities, or at least for those whose objectives include being a
model of environmental sustainability, social responsibility, and a
self-sufficient, progressive lifestyle.
The definition of an Intentional Community is
a
group of people who live and/or work together to achieve a common
purpose or set of shared objectives, and who also share social values,
passions or philosophy.
While most ICs are physical
communities, they may be virtual, and while the best-known are 24/7
living communities, some are working-hours only. What differentiates
them most from casual communities and 'networks' is the degree of
commitment and time dedicated to making them work.
Here's the list of Principles of Intentional Community that I came up with:
- Commitment to, and Action in Accordance with, Shared Values and Purpose:
The members agree to articulate their shared values and shared purpose,
and to strive, in everything they do, to live according to those values
and to strive to achieve that purpose. These will of course be
different for each IC. However, some values are implicit in the
principles below. While I suppose there might be communities whose
intent is to do something in contravention to the principles that
follow, I think most people would probably characterize these as cults
rather than ICs.
- Fair, Egalitarian, Participatory, Consensual Decision-Making and Dispute Resolution:
ICs are different from hierarchical organizations and those who select
'representatives' to make decisions for the members. It takes more time
to achieve consensus acceptable to all, rather than majority vote. It
also takes a commitment from all members to understand the issues that
must be decided, and to become skilled self-managers.
- Actions Based on Thorough Research and Knowledge: Many promising ICs have failed because they haven't done their homework and hence made rash, uninformed, fatal decisions.
- Cooperative and Collaborative Work:
You can obtain great joy from working collaboratively with others,
people you love and respect, but for some people in our individualistic
society such work is foreign and difficult.
- Communication, Openness, Outreach and Connectedness:
Members need to commit to transparency with those they live and work
with, and with the larger communities within which they live and work.
Many of these communication channels need to be actively created and
supported -- thy don't happen automatically.
- Assessment of Member Readiness and Fit: There
needs to be a process by which prospective members self-assess whether
they are ready for membership, existing members can objectively assess
their candidacy, and all can discuss openly whether the unique skills,
passions and sense of purpose a new member brings to the community is a
good fit with those of the current members.
- Common Ownership, Equitable Income and Wealth Distribution:
The issue of private property and equity of wealth and income is always
a thorny one in any social arrangement, and ICs are no different. I'm
going to write more on this in a later article, but for now I would
say, from what I've seen and read, that IC members need to give up the
idea of private property (but not privacy) and commit to the principle
that no member should be disproportionately wealthier than any other.
- Shared Responsibility and Acceptance of Interdependence:
Following from principle #2 above, members need to acknowledge a
responsibility to participate fully in the activities of the IC and not
delegate that responsibility or authority to others. Likewise, the
interdependence of members must be appreciated -- every action (and
inaction) of every member has consequences for the entire community.
- Mutual Respect and Trust:
This one's pretty obvious. Without respect and trust, which must be
continuously earned and given, there can be no enduring relationship
and hence no community.
- Non-Violence: Pacifist, but not passive.
- Non-Discrimination: This
is another tricky principle that I'll write more about in a future
article. Some people see an IC as an opportunity to live more
comfortably with "their own kind".
- Sustainability, Conservation, Simplicity, Sufficiency, Humility and Frugality:
An IC provides an excellent opportunity to share costs and resources,
and knowledge of how to live a more natural, simple and sustainable
life, using practices such as permaculture, biodynamic agriculture,
bioregionalism,Thomas Princen's sufficiency practices and Jim Merkel's radical simplicity practices, such as:
- leaving the Earth as we found it, unhampered in its ability to sustain itself indefinitely,
- consuming as little of the Earth's resources as we need to be fully ourselves,
- measuring
our 'success' not by material wealth or GDP but by the quality of our
lives ('our' meaning that of all creatures we share our ecosystems
with) -- health, well-being, happiness, learning, love, and
- relearning to listen to the Earth, to pay attention, and to live in harmony as a part of it
- Self-Sufficiency:
Most ICs, for economic or aesthetic reasons, are located away from
cities and the resources that create dependency on centralized systems
(the electrical grid, central heating, malls) in many modern
neighbourhoods. The combination of space (for growing food and
generating renewable energy) and collaboration (sharing skills and
resources) allows ICs to be collectively self-sufficient, in part
because of the interdependence of their members.
- Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Being a Model:
ICs tend to attract creative, independent thinkers with the capacity
and willingness to experiment with novel ways of doing things and,
through mutual support, to be entrepreneurial, and hence to serve as
models for modern societies that are, for the most part, inflexible,
unimaginative, and slow to respond to change and new needs.
- Healthy Community:
Away from most pollutants, not locked into a sedentary lifestyle, and
informed of the dangers of chemicals in food, water, air and soil, and
alternative and novel health treatments, ICs can be pioneers in
self-management of personal health, and self-diagnosis and
self-treatment of illness. And by incorporating exercise, relaxation
and spiritual practices in their daily routines, they can be much
healthier than average citizens.
- Continuous, Self-Directed Learning, Discovery and Competency Development:
Just as a degree of autonomy is both a challenge and opportunity in
self-managed health, it can also be a challenge and opportunity for
self-directed learning, both for children and throughout life. Many ICs
have adopted breakthrough educational programs based on the work of
Steiner, Illich and Gatto, and through unschooling and Internet
technologies and knowledge, and through members teaching and showing
each other what they know, have taken responsibility and developed
capacity for learning without the need for institutions.
- Optimization of Collective Happiness and Well-Being: What ultimately brings most people to ICs
is dissatisfaction with the way they are living and making a living.
ICs, through work-sharing and collective imagination, can let their
members rediscover how to entertain themselves, how to play, how to
have fun, and how to live joyously without a need for external
stimulation. And sensitivity to each others' feelings helps to build a
collective, self-reinforcing sense of well-being and joy.
- Enabling Self-Realization and Self-Actualization: Even
beyond comfort, health and happiness on the Maslow scale, ICs offer
nearly unparalleled opportunity for their members to be more
authentically human, more genuinely themselves. Being part of an
integral community enables deep self-knowledge and, if it is in a
natural setting, deep ecology and reconnection with one's senses,
instincts and all-life-on-Earth. I would argue that this is the only
foundation for self-realization and self-actualization.
From
this list, you can see how much more work and responsibility is vested
in the individual members of Intentional Communities than is the case
in most 'neighbourhoods of convenience'. From my discussions, this
workload can be anywhere from 10 to over 40 hours per week, depending
on the individual community and the degree to which its members get
their livelihood right within that community. Members need to know what
they're getting into -- while I'd be prepared to invest 10 hours a week
in an IC, I wouldn't invest 40 -- like most people I don't want to work
that hard, and I don't think, if a community has the right members and
stays faithful to these principles, it should be necessary to work that
hard.
At the same time, acceptance and adherence to these
principles is setting high expectations of a community's members. Some
might say it asks too much, and that this list should be stripped down
to the principles that are absolutely essential to success and
sustainability.
Personally, I think we're past that stage. We
urgently need models of a better way to live and make a living, and
these principles, while they set a high standard of behaviour and
performance, are not that demanding or arduous, and their successful
adoption could show the world just what is possible. If not Intentional Community, then what?
|
MADE IN CANADA
trust your
instincts 
