Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays.
In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.




 

  August 19, 2008


harper bushIt is hard to imagine that the US doesn't have a plan to annex Canada. A nation that has no hesitation in trumping up charges against a country half a world away when it is perceived to threaten its energy security, and then bombing the hell out of it, killing and injuring hundreds of thousands of civilians and utterly destroying its infrastructure and social fabric, would not think twice about seizing control of a nation that offers it even more (and whose animosity would severely threaten its national interest).

There was a plan, in the years between the two world wars, to do just that. It was declassified decades ago and now makes rather quaint reading. But there is no question that there is an American "contingency plan" to annex Canada if need be, just as surely as there is one to bomb Iran as the next stage to secure the oil on which the entire American economy utterly depends.

There are reasons to believe that the US doesn't expect it will have to do this. More than half of all Canadian business, by revenue, is foreign-owned, and the vast majority of that is American. The employment picture is probably comparable, although it's hard to compute when franchisees of foreign companies are considered Canadian companies. Likewise, there are no records of citizenship or residence of land-holders in Canada, so determining how much land is in foreign hands is impossible to determine. But it is pretty evident that the Canadian economy is substantially foreign-owned and foreign-controlled. If we did something to displease our American owners, they could shut down our economy pretty effectively.

This sell-out has occurred over decades, with both Liberal and Conservative regimes dismantling Canadian ownership regulations consistently. Then we signed NAFTA, effectively ceding authority to write social or environmental laws any stronger than those of the weakest laws anywhere in the three countries. When you can't write laws to protect your own people, you really have no sovereignty left. The right-wing Harper minority government has made no secret of its desire for full political and economic integration with the US, and the reaction of the Canadian people has been astonishingly blasé. Our economy is so dependent on the US already that the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar moves in lockstep with the Dow.

There is reason to believe that this control will not be enough to placate those in the US concerned with trying to sustain that country's unsustainable economy, however:
  1. The US desperately needs the oil from Canada's bitumen sludge mines (the so-called "tar sands"), the worst ecological disaster on the planet. These operations are currently uneconomic, and it will take huge improvements in technology, and the energy from whole farms of nuclear power plants and natural gas from Canada's fragile arctic, to extract the oil from the sludge. It will also take staggering amounts of Canadian fresh water. 
  2. Speaking of water, the US needs Canada's Western glacial water to replace the rapidly disappearing glacial water that provides people, industry and recreation with most of their water in most of the Western US states. Canada's water is also running out, except in the Arctic, but the US shortage will be much more severe and come much sooner.
  3. Electricity from Canadian hydroelectric plants supplies a substantial amount of US electrical needs. But Canadians are trying to shut down coal-fired power plants and use hydro power to make up some of the difference.
  4. As global warming melts the Arctic, there will be huge pressure to plunder the hydrocarbons in that area. It's a drop in the bucket compared to the US thirst for oil, but the US is desperate for anything they can fill gas tanks with. Much of this energy is under Canadian waters, but the US has recently said it will not honour Canadian sovereignty over these waters, and considers them "international waters". Burning this energy will, of course, accelerate global warming.
  5. Likewise, as the Arctic melts, the lucrative Northwest Passage will be open for shipping year-round. It is clearly in Canadian waters, but the US disputes this sovereignty.
None of this bodes well for the future of Canada-US relations, and as the US starts to run out of land, the hunger for more land will make the situation even more volatile.

This could all come to a head if Canada were to do (or try to do) any of the following:
  1. Restrict foreign ownership of land, resources or assets or shares of businesses in 'strategic' industries.
  2. Increase social or environmental regulations to the point the bitumen sludge mining operations or Arctic development became non-viable at any price.
  3. Restrict taking of water from Canadian waters, or sale of electricity to non-Canadians.
  4. Proclaim sovereignty over Canadian waters.
These are not especially grievous things for a country to do -- most countries believe it is their right to do these things in areas of their own jurisdiction.

But not Canada. If we were to try to do any of these things, the US would simply say "no". They would start by protesting, and suing us under NAFTA and other extraterritorial laws. And if that wasn't enough they would do whatever it took to get the restrictions on their untrammeled access to our resources, land and waters removed. Whatever it took.

Harper rolled over on NAFTA already, settling for a fraction (still unpaid) of what the NAFTA courts said the US stole from us illegally. He has no intention of doing anything to impede Canada-US integration.

But at some point Canadians will have had enough of Harper's arrogance, just as they did with the previous Conservative administration of Mulroney, and turf him out of office. He is in power now only because his right-wing party competes with four left-of-centre parties who split the vote in our absurd first-past-the-post voting system. Most Canadians would be glad to see the end of him, and sooner or later they will get their way, and a party or coalition amenable to the majority will be elected. And that new government will almost certainly do one or more of the four things above. The US will then say "no" and do whatever it takes to have the restrictions blocked or removed.

What will we do then? I suspect we will do nothing. Four in ten Americans want to annex Canada anyway, according to a recent poll. In another poll, only 57% of British citizens would support action to defend Canada from US annexation.

Canadians are pacifists at heart. Most of us no longer believe the war in Afghanistan is worth continuing, and most of us always opposed the war in Iraq. We have among the most liberal immigration laws in the world, taking in far more than our share of refugees and immigrants (though now, under Harper, American war objectors are no longer accepted, but that will be a short-lived anomaly). We acknowledge, I guess, that our natural wealth was a fortune of birth, not something we really earned. It belongs to the world, to all of us, and if someone wants to steal it from us, we'll just shrug and say "too bad, it was nice while it lasted".

Americans, believers in manifest destiny, the private ownership of everything, might makes right, and the end justifies the means, can't really understand this. They see it as cowardice, or complacency, tacit approval for their takeover of everything Canadian, and for their American worldview. They will turn the rest of Western Canada into a deforested and toxic wasteland, and Northern Canada into a melting, oil-slicked military stronghold. And we will let them, while convincing ourselves that It's not really that bad, There is no other real choice, I don't know anything about that, or There's nothing we can do about that.

That's what empires do to colonies. And that's what colonies do when they do it.


11:58:24 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2008 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 01/09/2008; 10:25:56 PM.

August 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Jul   Sep

SEARCH BLOG How to Save the World

Click to see the XML version of this web page.
Subscribe to this blog by
Email:
leafMADE IN CANADA leaf trust your instincts


MY GRAVITATIONAL COMMUNITY

People who have inspired or informed me frequently over the past few months. For my full blogroll/online reference library, see here. [* indicates people I connect with in real time, f2f, via IM, Skype or SL chat.]

Artists:
Aleah (CA)*
Amy (CA)
Andrew (UK)*
Jen  (US)
Kevin (JP)
Melisa  (US)*
Michael (CA)*
Nick
(CA)*
Pohangina Pete (NZ)*
Sharon (US)
Susan H  (US)*

Business, Health, Tech:
Colleen (US)
Dave S (US)
Jeremy (CA)*
Jon (CA)*
Karen H (CA)*
Lugon (ES)*
Marty (CA)*
Paul/Grace (CA)*
Shawn (AU)*
Therapy Doc (US)

Communication, Learning:
Barbara (BR)*
Chris C (CA)*
Chris L (CA)*
Geoff (AU)*
Mariella (PE)*
Marjolein (NL)*
Nancy (US)*
Rob (CA)*
Siona (US)*
Sue B (CA)*
Tree (US)
Viv (AU)*

Community Makers:  
Cheryl (AU)*
Daisy/Emily (US)
Don (US)
Liz S (US)
Melindigo
(US)*
Sarah B (US)*

Environment:
Chelsea Green (US)*
Dale (US)*
Dave P (CA)
ETBNC (US)*
Steve (SE)*
Zane (CA)
Natalie (CA)*
Sam (US)

Philosophy/Spirituality:
Amanda (US)*
Beth P (US)
Craig (US)
Evelyn (US)
Karen C (US)
Melinda (US)*
Michelle (AU)*
Victor (CA)
William (US)

Second Lifers:
Aletheia (UK)*

Belasierra (US)*
Harm 
(US)*
Samsara (US)*
SingingHeart (US)*
Skyler (US)*
Sojourner (US)*
Theresa (CA)*

Storytellers:
Barb K (US)
Beth T (US)
Cassandra (CA)
Deb (US)
Joe (BZ)*
Karen S (US)
Patri (US)
Patti (US)*
PS (US)
Terrapraeta (US)




.
.
.
.
.

Subscribe to "How to Save the World" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.


I'm listening to:

Visit the David Suzuki Foundation




WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
- original research,surveys etc.
- original,well-crafted fiction
- great finds: resources,blogs,essays, artistic works
- news not found anywhere else
- category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
- clever, concise political opinion consistent with their own views
- benchmarks,quantitative analysis
- personal stories,experiences,lessons learned
- first-hand accounts
- live reports from events
- insight:leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
- short educational pieces
- relevant "aha" graphics
- great photos
- useful tools and checklists
- précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
- fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
- constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
- 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
- requests for future posts on specific subjects
- foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
- reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
- wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
- comments that engender lively discussion
- guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.