Dave Pollard's environmental philosophy, creative works, business papers and essays. In search of a better way to live and make a living, and a better understanding of how the world really works.
Wednesday
I listed the things I want to do, and one of them was "to become better
at conversing, presenting and demonstrating". To that end I've been
watching videos of great presenters (like Garr
Reynolds and Clay
Shirky) and reading articles
(like Jay Lehr's Let
There Be Stoning for Bad Presenters).
A number of truths about good presentations emerge from this:
Good presentations
move quickly and are polished, showing that they have been
well-rehearsed and practiced. This is, after all, unlike writing, a
real-time performance art.
Good presentations are
never read, and are never amplifications of displayed bullet points.
What's on the screen enhances and reinforces rather than summarizes
what is being said; it is content that cannot be simply said. It is
therefore usually graphical, always interesting and readily
graspable, and never a distraction from what is being said.
Good presentations are
dynamic, enthralling, and provocative. It is not enough that they just
provide information (that can be done perfectly well using other media).
In order to meet these three criteria, you have to invest considerable
time, effort, thought and energy into preparing your presentation, and
you must be, as the word 'presentation' implies, present.
For that to happen you have to really care
about your subject and your message. For that reason, at conferences I
usually skip presentations made by 'experts', politicians and
celebrities, since these are often self-aggrandizing, sloppy, and
written by others.
One of the exercises I've set for myself is to craft and practice short
'elevator
pitches' on subjects where I am
attempting to bring about change. They have two overarching objectives:
To answer the
question in the intended audience's mind "Why should I care about
this?"
To be
sufficiently memorable that the
audience won't be able to get it out of their minds until they've acted
upon it, and will be able to re-tell it coherently.
It would be nice if they were also persuasive, imparted new
information, and were effective enough that people would remember not
only my message but also me, thus enhancing my reputation, but these
are much less important. All I really want to do is get them to care
about the subject, and pass along their new-found passion to others.
Just help them get started, as Patti Digh says. This is the essence of
viruses: it's when hundreds and thousands of people start to care about
something that they can do something about, that change occurs.
The best way to get people to care about something, in my experience,
is to show them that you
care about it, and why. The key to doing this, in almost every case, is
to tell
a story.
Watch the best TED talks, speeches of change advocates, and even
technical talks, and you'll find most of them answer the two questions
above by telling a compelling story enthusiastically, memorably and in
a way that provokes further conversation and action.
My first exercise is to revamp my bio from a story of what I've done
to a story about what I care about.
First step is to answer the question What do I care about?
(that others can do something about). The difficulty I have with this
is that most of these things are complex -- they're not easy to explain
in an elevator pitch. Some examples:
I think our
globalized, growth-economy based, oil-dependent, unsustainable, unresilient
civilization is going to crash in this century, no matter what we do,
and our descendents are going to suffer monstrously when it
happens.
I think industrial
agriculture (and animal factory farming in particular) is a
horrifically cruel and wasteful system that contributes massively to
climate change, deforestation, impoverishment of soil and loss of
biodiversity.
I believe that the
greatest challenge we face in this century is finding the right
partners to collaborate with, in our personal lives, in enterprise, in
political activism and in community.
I believe we need to
de-school our society, and relearn the process of self-directed learning
focused on developing critical knowledge and capacities such as
understanding how the world really works, acquiring self-knowledge and
self-understanding, learning how to discover what we are meant to do,
and learning how to deal with complex issues.
When I think about trying to prepare a cogent, concise story that
conveys why I believe each of these things, and that imagines some ways
we could effectively act on them, I despair. These beliefs are the
results of years of thoughtful study, research, discussion and
reflection. Am I not, as I keep saying, "too far ahead" of most people
to ever hope to find a point of connection with them on these very
contentious beliefs? Wouldn't I be better just telling people I believe
these things and associating and collaborating with those who are at
the same point in their learning and self-discovery journey that I'm at?
Maybe, for a start, it's sufficient that when people ask me to say
something about myself, who I am or what I do, I reply instead by
saying that what I do is driven by the four profound, controversial,
considered beliefs above, and that these are the things I really care
about. And when I'm asked for my bio, I do the same: Instead of
trotting out my work experience and credentials, I tell them that once
I learned enough about what is really happening in the world, I had to
stop living my comfortable, acquisitive life and start to take action
on these four core beliefs.
But, beyond that, I'm going to try to write an elevator pitch on each
of the four issues above, a pitch that meets the two criteria above,
that actually impels my audience to at least consider the validity of these
beliefs and to think about how they might act if these beliefs are
valid. You'll read these pitches here first, and I'll be looking for
you to help me hone them into the core of great presentations.
I'd be interested, in the meantime, about what you care about that
others might be able to act on, and how you have conveyed your passion
for these causes and beliefs effectively to others.
MY GRAVITATIONAL COMMUNITY People
who have inspired or informed me frequently over the past few months.
For my full blogroll/online reference library, see
here. [* indicates
people I connect with in real time, f2f, via IM, Skype or SL chat.]
- original research,surveys etc.
- original,well-crafted fiction
- great finds: resources,blogs,essays, artistic works
- news not found anywhere else
- category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
- clever, concise political opinion consistent with their own views
- benchmarks,quantitative analysis
- personal stories,experiences,lessons learned
- first-hand accounts
- live reports from events
- insight:leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
- short educational pieces
- relevant "aha" graphics
- great photos
- useful tools and checklists
- précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
- fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content
Blog writers
want to see more:
- constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
- 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
- requests for future posts on specific subjects
- foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
- reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
- wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
- comments that engender lively discussion
- guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs