Dave Pollard's papers on business innovation & knowledge management



July 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Jun   Aug


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >








Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  July 30, 2004


no dellI deliberately waited a couple of weeks after my dreadful experience trying to get my new Dell 5150 fixed, partly to calm down and partly to make sure the problem has in fact been fixed. This is a long and convoluted story but because it's embarrassing, and not particularly amusing, I'm not going to tell it in detail. Suffice it to say that it involved:
  • Four courier trips by two different courier companies delivering parts between my house and the Dell Parts Depot
  • Four trips by me to a company called Solectron, located North ofToronto, to which Dell subcontracts technical service work
  • Six lengthy conversations with Dell India, which handles the diagnosis of technical problems for non-corporate customers
  • Thirty bewildering e-mail messages trying to get answers online, only to be told to RTFM, and then that Canadian non-corporate customers cannot get service by e-mail, and must instead phone Dell India
  • One infuriating conversation with Dell 'Customer Care', a total oxymoron, with a guy who spoke English with no accent but I have no idea where he was located (he refused to say)
The final diagnosis was that a defective $5 AC adapter shorted out not one, but two motherboards. Total cost to Dell for parts, delivery and labour: about $2,000, and even that is less than the value of my time spent trying to get the problem fixed. My computer was out of service for a week. IF I had been simply instructed to take the PC into Solectron and wait for them to check it out, I would have been in and out in 30 minutes and the cost would have been minimal.

Since I'm copying Dell on this (that is if I can actually find an address of someone in authority to send it to) rather than tell you all the things that they did wrong (and that, acting on their instruction, I did wrong), I'll describe instead how Dell could dramatically improve their customer service processes.

But before I do, I want to be clear about something: The people working at the grassroots level at Dell and its outsourcers are all hard-working, polite people doing their best to do their job. All the fuck-ups (and they were legion) were directly caused by Dell management policies, and can only be rectified by Dell management.

OK. Here's what Dell needs to do to change the 'customer experience' from ghastly, interminable nightmare to quick-and-bearable:
  1. Provide single-point-of-contact for each service issue. Solectron was wonderful -- far more knowledgeable than those disembodied voices at the end of the telephone. The first time I phoned, or e-mailed, with a problem, Solectron should have handled the issue. Yeah, I know Dell doesn't trust their outsourcer not to pad the bill, especially on warrantee work. That's one of the problems with outsourcing.
  2. When you tell the customer to take/send in their computer, tell them to send it all in. I was told by Dell India to take everything out and just send in the shell. This is the lawyers talking, and more distrust of the outsourcer. This is just plain bad policy.
  3. If you're going to use people in India to do diagnostics, for pete's sake trust them. More than half of the very long time that these telephone conversations took was dead air -- while the tech service people apologetically put me repeatedly on hold to get 'permission' to send me a $5 part, or to check with their boss that it was OK for me to take/send in my computer for warrantee service. It's outrageous that customers have to wait on line while employees are treated like children and second-guessed by their superiors.
  4. Educate your people about the individual policies of your outsourcers. Solectron Canada has an in-by-10, out-by-5 same-day repair policy. The people at Dell didn't know about it, and that cost me an extra day.
  5. Give your outsourcers a full supply of repair parts, and let them sell parts retail as well. When the outsourcers have to requisition parts from Dell and then wait for them to come in, that unnecessarily delays customer service. If Dell had the decency to provide loaners to customers who are without their machines more than 24 hours, this might not be so bad. But they don't, so delays just add insult to injury.
  6. Just get rid of 'Customer Care', and provide a proper complaint department instead. The so-called Customer Care department has absolutely no authority to do anything for customers. Their sole job is to explain and apologize for Dell's idiotic policies, including the five above. They are instructed never to give out their full names, and never to give out names, addresses or contact information of anyone higher up in Dell. In other words, these lackeys are paid to run interference, stonewall and prevent aggrieved customers, and customers who have ideas for improvement, from any contact with the people in Dell who could resolve or act on them. Staggering arrogance, disgraceful and classic corporatist contempt for customers. Every customer has the right to complain, in writing, about bad service or bad products. And in the process to copy the regulatory authorities so that if the complaints are frequent, the conduct of the company will be investigated.
Dell just reported record earnings last week. Michael Dell and his fellow executives each raked in over $3 million last year, excluding the huge value of their stock options. Meanwhile, according to Consumer Reports, about one laptop in four has a serious problem in its short shelflife -- that's about 100,000,000 units with at least one important defect. One in twelve has problems in the first month of ownership, and one in eight has a problem that makes the computer completely inoperable -- that's 25,000,000 people per year temporarily unable to do their job while the tech support people fiddle with defects in their employers' products. Customer satisfaction ranks just around 50%, the second lowest ratings of any consumer products the magazine tracks. There is a large increase in complaints about offshored tech support in the past year.

The big seven produce about 200,000,000 new computers each year, which on average end up in landfill sites in four to five years (the fastest growing and one of the most toxic components of our garbage problem). The vast majority are made from shoddy materials in third world countries like China, Malaysia and Singapore, by workers who get paid a few dollars a day, using components that wreak environmental havoc from slipshod and reckless mining and refining techniques. Why bother making a quality product when it will be garbage so soon anyway? And if you work with Microsoft et al, you can guarantee that even if it isn't technically obsolete by the time it falls apart, it will be unable to power the next bloated versions of the software by then anyway. I would have added a point 7 above -- "build a high quality product" -- but even I'm not that naive. My new AC adapter works fine, but still fits loosely in the slot at the back of the machine, and usually falls out when I lift up the machine to put it on my lap. If they built cars this sloppily we'd all be dead.

This is what happens when a company gets big, and is rewarded for 'maximizing profit for shareholders' instead of producing a quality product and providing quality service. It's what happens when a company's management becomes removed, and then isolated, from its customers. It's what happens when an oligopoly of seven companies corners the market and offers essentially identical, mediocre, overpriced products. It's what we get when we fail to hold corporations accountable and responsible for what they do. It's what we get when we accept the corporatist propaganda that the unregulated 'market' will always produce the best possible solution and value for customers, and that government regulation is inherently bad.

We should know better. We should expect better. We deserve better.

11:27:08 AM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 04/08/2004; 3:52:41 PM.



SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World

SEARCH SALON
Search All Salon Blogs



Technorati Profile

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Add to My Yahoo!

.
.
.
.
.


Subscribe to "Business Innovation" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.





WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.