Like
people, organizations tend to change slowly, and in response to
external forces. In people, changes are more evident from generation to
generation (the cause of generation 'gaps' and a great deal of family
stress). New organizations, likewise, are more likely to manifest
behaviours responsive to the needs of their customers, employees, and
other stakeholders than those that have been around awhile. We call
these behaviours, collectively, culture.
What
changes in the needs and wants of stakeholders will precipitate changes
in organizational culture in the coming generation? Here are some
likely bets:
| Today's Behaviour: | Tomorrow's Behaviour: | | Selling aggressively, using researsed persuasive techniques | Conversing with customers to discover, and then respond to, articulated customer needs | | Advertising to 'create demand' | Viral marketing | | Analyzing the market, using surveys and demographic data | Observing customer buying behaviours, using 'cultural anthropology' techniques | | Standardizing processes and products | Improvising processes and products | | Collecting and searching for best practices | Scanning and probing for emerging patterns | | Executive decision-making by managers and experts based on experience and advice from consultants | Canvassing the crowd to make decisions based on collective wisdom | | Marketing trials to test new products using prototypes | Co-developing new products with customers and other partners using multiple parallel experiments | | Make huge margins on software and content that has almost no variable cost | Give away software and content to attract customers to personalized events and containers | | Tell customers how good your product is, using various media | Show customers how good your product is, by giving demonstrations and samples | | Offer sophisticated, multifunction products | Offer simple, elegant products that do a few things really well | | Collect and archive large amounts of knowledge just in case | Canvass for knowledge just in time | | Offer low-cost products that break or become obsolete or unfashionable in a few years | Offer durable, upgradable products that never go out of fashion, and do more with less | | Use size, acquisitions and vast intellectual property to dominate their market | Use innovation, agility and buzz to disrupt their market | | Price products at what the market will bear | Price products at what customers can really afford |
These changes will be driven by:
- a shift in knowledge and power from suppliers to customers and end-consumers
- the
failure of the 'blockbuster' model of product offerings (where all the
profit comes from one or two smash hit products, often followed by
cheap, mediocre 'sequels') as consumers catch on
- the availability through the Internet of almost infinite choice at modest cost
- an Internet culture that believes that software and content should be free to all
- the end of cheap oil, labour and other resources
- new,
innovative competitors in many industries that won't need to be big to
have a huge market impact, and which will be astonishingly prolific and
agile (imagine a thousand Googles!)
- the wide-spread realization
(thanks to interest rate spikes and a shrinking economy) that living
beyond our needs is reckless and unsustainable
- a growing lack of trust in corporations, thanks to an ongoing litany of scandals
It's
going to be fascinating to watch this evolution. For the Fortune 500
(and for their shareholders) it's likely to be bloody, a replay of the
transformation that has seen huge organizations crumble and small
upstarts soar past them over and over since the start of the Industrial
Revolution. What's likely to be different this time, however, is that
the new upstarts will not grow into megaliths, but will instead spin
off divisions into hundreds of small, autonomous, ever-agile
entrepreneurial companies.
The big corporations just don't get
it. They don't understand why so many are outraged that we're sitting
on intellectual and financial capital that could end disease and
poverty on this planet, but we can't do so because it would be
unacceptable to the handful of staggeringly rich families that control
this capital. They don't understand why Google is giving so many of its
brilliant and valuable new tools and content away free. They don't
understand why eBay paid billions to buy Skype. They don't understand
why so many 'respectable' people don't equate file-sharing, the modern
equivalent of going to the library, as theft. They are still stuck in
the same mentality that predicted the telephone would never catch on,
or that the world only needed a handful of computers.
The future of business is a world of ends. If our world lasts that long, of course. |