Three years ago I reviewed, in glowing terms, and excerpted parts from, a book called Presence with
four authors, one of whom is MIT lecturer Otto Scharmer, creator of
Theory U, illustrated above, which is the backbone of the concept
called Presencing, and of the book.
In light of yesterday's post, in which I explained what "presence" has recently come to mean to me (a combination of self-awareness of which one of several dozen types of activities I am doing at any point in my day, and employment of the appropriate process for that activity, a process that has been allowed to emerge and continuously improve through practice), I thought it might be worth taking another look at my earlier review.
At
the time, as excited as I was about the concept, I described the book
and its ideas as flawed and tentative. Since then I have found the book
really difficult to act upon. More and more I've come to realize that
it was Scharmer's Theory U that I liked, and that the rest of the book
(notably Peter Senge's apparent insistence on putting
"institutionalization" at the end -- top upper right -- of the U,
presumably to make it more appealing to business executives who want
theory to be actionable in traditional command-and-control
measurable-results terms) actually detracted
from Scharmer's theory. I'm pleased to see that Scharmer's latest
version, above, has eliminated the hierarchical junk from the model and
made it more personal, where the assessment of learning and
responsibility for action are left to individual team members, as they
should be. Theory U is now more consistent with Open Space type
methodologies that are trusting of individuals but allow the insights
and actions to emerge from collaborative effort. In fact, his latest 2-page summary of the theory contains an even better, clearer graphic of the process:
Theory U is in essence a problem-solving (or more accurately perhaps a problem-addressing)
process. Scharmer proposes this process to optimize both collaboration
and innovation, and as a guide for coaches to use to enable
collaborative and innovative capacity in individuals and teams working
on (especially intractable) problems.
The co-initiating step includes self-organizing the team, studying patterns and paying attention -- being aware. Its principal 'product' is an engaged and informed team.
The co-sensing step entails making sense of what you are now aware of. Its principal product is understanding.
The presencing step is the most challenging for traditional organizations to accept, I suspect. It is what Scharmer calls letting go and letting come, a being open to possibility, using imagination and critical and creative thinking. Its principal products are emerging approaches.
The co-creating step is one of iteratively exploring and experimenting with these possible approaches. Its principal products are working models.
The co-evolving
step is the continuous and improvisational study, improvement and
innovation of these models, collaboratively in peer production with the
community of users of these models (the models 'continuously becoming'
better and better products and services in practice -- there is no
longer such a thing as a 'finished product', just the latest and best
evolved 'version'). Its principal products are sustained innovation, relationships and resilience.
Those of you who've read the proofs of my new book Finding the Sweet Spot will
probably recognize, as I did, that Scharmer's U is a very similar
process to the one I recommend for creating Natural Enterprises. These
Natural Enterprises I've so long admired, places where work is
responsible, sustainable, joyful, meaningful and natural, are the
organizational embodiment of Theory U.
And he says this about what happens to teams that have been through the U process together: "Often they begin to function as an intentional vehicle for an emerging future." So this process is also the process that Intentional Communities use to self-form and thrive.
Maybe I should get our mutual friend Andrew Campbell to introduce me to Otto.
Subscribe to this blog by
MADE IN CANADA
trust your
instincts
MY GRAVITATIONAL COMMUNITY
People
who have inspired or informed me frequently over the past few months.
For my full blogroll/online reference library, see
here. [* indicates
people I connect with in real time, f2f, via IM, Skype or SL chat.]
- original research,surveys etc.
- original,well-crafted fiction
- great finds: resources,blogs,essays, artistic works
- news not found anywhere else
- category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
- clever, concise political opinion consistent with their own views
- benchmarks,quantitative analysis
- personal stories,experiences,lessons learned
- first-hand accounts
- live reports from events
- insight:leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
- short educational pieces
- relevant "aha" graphics
- great photos
- useful tools and checklists
- précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
- fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content
Blog writers
want to see more:
- constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
- 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
- requests for future posts on specific subjects
- foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
- reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
- wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
- comments that engender lively discussion
- guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs