Dave Pollard's essays on politics & economics.



August 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Jul   Sep


leafMADE IN CANADA

leaf trust your instincts



< £ Salon Bloggers & >





Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 


 

  August 26, 2005


Utah
Guess where this was shot? Read on to find out.

Since I may not have time Saturday to post them, here is my list of most interesting links of the week, a day early.

Another Service Decline: From Citizen to Patient: Benedict Carey in the NYT explains how dehumanization and loss of identity is hurting relationships in medical facilities and therefore reducing the quality of care. "The point is that when they talk about quality of health care, patients mean something entirely different than experts do," said Dr. Drew Altman. In an institution like a hospital, "the territories of the self are violated," [Dr. Erving Goffman] wrote. "The boundary that the individual places between his being and the environment is invaded and the embodiments of the self profaned." This is the second in a series of NYT articles on challenges in the health care system.

An Exemplary Animal Rights Site: Humanefood.ca has been compiled by a coalition of organizations concerned with farm animal welfare. They're using carefully-placed, non-sensational TV spots to draw people to the website (you can view them on the site). The site itself isn't begging for money or stirring outrage. It's communicating useful, objective facts and telling you (in the You Can Help section) precisely what you can do to help -- and not just by writing letters to politicians and the media, but by changing your purchasing decisions and working with local grocery stores, restaurants and farms.

The LifeStraw: Gizmag describes a new invention with no moving parts and using no electricity that could save tens of millions of lives per year, the lives of people who now die from preventable water-borne diseases that are caused by overcrowding and lack of sufficient money and infrastructure to treat water properly.

Reintroducing Wilderness in the US: National Geographic describes a controversial 'rewilding' plan to create "ecological history parks" where the descendants of ice age creatures would be introduced into the plains states where human populations are declining. Good idea or bad? Thanks to Lavonne at BornFamous for the link.

Natural Clothing for the UK: By Nature offers organic, environment-friendly clothing, gifts, housewares, cosmetics and foods for caring British and European consumers.

Google Desktop 2 and Google Talk: If anyone doesn't know already, Google Desktop 2 offers a side bar with news and other handy stuff (not yet very useful to me, though it's open source so additional content may change that) and a Search Bar that shows results as you type each letter, and allows you to open those results without even using your browser to display them. Google Talk offers a stripped-down competitor for Skype, and for IM, and proposes that competitors match their IM tools to Google's to eliminate all the separate and incompatible IM products out there.

Utah Cops Go Nuts: Attendees at a recent outdoor concert in Utah, which had all the necessary permits, were assaulted by land and air by a small army of power-crazed and brutal police authorities. The cops injured dozens, terrorized the concert-goers and caused thousands of dollars in damage, in addition to violating just about every law imaginable. Screen capture from one attendee's video is shown above. Must be a red state.

TV Sports Without Announcers: As a consequence of the brutal CBC lockout, the management of the CBC has been trying out sports event coverage without commentators, describing it as "the stadium experience at home". I used to get this experience on the 'feed' channels on the old Big Ugly Dish satellites, and it was wonderful. CBC viewers apparently agree. Now if we could only get this for gymnastics, diving and figure skating, and rid the world of the scourge of 'colour commentators' entirely.

12:36:09 PM  trackback []  comment []

contempt
Malcolm Gladwell's latest article in the New Yorker explains why it is that:
  • The leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the US is unpaid medical bills
  • The death rate for Americans without health insurance is 25% higher than for those that have it
  • Americans spend 2.5 times what the rest of the Western world pays per capita for health care
  • The US has one of the lowest doctor/patient ratios in the West
  • Americans visit doctors and get admitted to hospital less often than people in most countries in the West
  • Americans are among the least satisfied with their health care system
  • US life expectancy is significantly lower than the average of Western nations, while childhood immunization rates are lower and infant mortality is higher
  • Americans spend over three times as much per capita on healthcare paperwork and administration as Canadians
  • Despite the high cost, the US is almost alone in the West in not having universal health care, and 45 million Americans have no health insurance at all
There is overwhelming evidence that people with no, or inadequate, health coverage are sicker, that this illness translates into poor physical appearance (bad teeth especially) and low self-esteem, and therefore these people have great difficulty getting decent-paying jobs and hence don't qualify for health insurance. The perfect vicious cycle.

The reason for this, says Gladwell, is the perpetuation of a neocon myth in the US that isn't accepted anywhere else in the Western world. That myth is called "Moral Hazard" and it says that having insurance changes the behaviour of the insured. If you have generous health insurance, Moral Hazard says you're going to go to the doctor and the hospital more often, sometimes unnecessarily, just because it's free. The evidence is all to the contrary, but the myth prevails in the US nevertheless. What's more, there is evidence that in the few areas where people actually do avail themselves of health care services that aren't absolutely, critically needed (like dental checkups), the preventative value of these services exceeds their cost, so such 'abuses' actually save the health care system money. 

In some areas of insurance, Moral Hazard actually has some validity. For example, the S&L failures in the 1980s were caused to some degree by reckless lending due to generous FDIC government guarantees. The assurance of bailouts if loans failed actually encouraged some S&L's to lend irresponsibly. But this simply doesn't apply in the health industry. Most people don't frivolously use medical services just because they're available free. And users of Medicare, the only aspect of the US health care system based on the social insurance model (which equalizes financial risk between the healthy and the sick) -- the model used in every other Western nation -- are consistently vastly happier with their plan than Americans with private health insurance.

Bush's new Health Savings Accounts, nevertheless, presupposes Moral Hazard is the principal reason the US health system is in crisis, and its effect will be simply to reduce the use of the health system by the country's sickest people. Instead of the social insurance model it uses the discredited actuarial model (like car insurance, where cost is related to the perceived risk of making claims). So many Americans with expensive medical conditions cannot get insurance at all. Stanford economist Victor Fuchs says "this reduces the social redistributive element of insurance" and that Health Savings Accounts are hence the antithesis of universal health care.

Rather than technical arguments, Gladwell says, Americans should be asking themselves these questions:
  • Do you think redistribution of risk (so that the healthy subsidize the sick) is a good idea?
  • Is it fair that those genetically predisposed to illness and tooth ailments, or whose poverty complicates diseases like asthma and diabetes, or who are unlucky enough to be in serious accidents, should bear a greater proportion of health care costs than those who aren't?
That's not to say that there aren't people who abuse the system. But to punish 45 million Americans (at least) because of a mythological belief that people are naturally inclined to abuse anything they can get for free is not only cruel and inhumane, it's ideologically obsessive, wrong-headed and irrational. But then that's the very definition of the Bush administration and their cronies. Tragic, and disgraceful.

12:34:00 PM  trackback []  comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2005 Dave Pollard.
Last update: 01/09/2005; 2:05:53 PM.



SEARCH SITE
How to Save the World



leaf THINKING OF MOVING TO CANADA?
(immigration info blog)


Technorati Cosmos


Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Subscribe to this blog by
Add to My Yahoo!

.
.
.
.
.


Subscribe to "Politics & Economics" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.





WHAT THE BLOGOSPHERE WANTS MORE OF

Blog readers want to see more:
  1. original research, surveys etc.
  2. original, well-crafted fiction
  3. great finds: resources, blogs, essays, artistic works
  4. news not found anywhere else
  5. category killers: aggregators that capture the best of many blogs/feeds, so they need not be read individually
  6. clever, concise political opinion (most readers prefer these consistent with their own views)
  7. benchmarks, quantitative analysis
  8. personal stories, experiences, lessons learned
  9. first-hand accounts
  10. live reports from events
  11. insight: leading-edge thinking & novel perspectives
  12. short educational pieces
  13. relevant "aha" graphics
  14. great photos
  15. useful tools and checklists
  16. précis, summaries, reviews and other time-savers
  17. fun stuff: quizzes, self-evaluations, other interactive content

Blog writers want to see more:
  1. constructive criticism, reaction, feedback
  2. 'thank you' comments, and why readers liked their post
  3. requests for future posts on specific subjects
  4. foundation articles: posts that writers can build on, on their own blogs
  5. reading lists/aggregations of material on specific, leading-edge subjects that writers can use as resource material
  6. wonderful examples of writing of a particular genre, that they can learn from
  7. comments that engender lively discussion
  8. guidance on how to write in the strange world of weblogs


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.