Excerpt of The Departure by Michael Parker

  HOME

Sunday, November 09, 2003

Another Quote from The True Believer

Why do people follow leaders and movements so blindly?  Why are Americans today so willing to sacrafice their civil liberty for "security?"  Personally, I think the following:

  1. Some people like to be on the winning side.  They'll support the person who they feel has the majority support.  
  2. Some people like to support the leader or movement giving them the most kick-backs. 
  3. People will follow the leader or movement that suits the culture and social standard they are familiar with.

Other than these, I feel Eric Hoffer has a legitimate and erudite explanation of these questions in sections 93 and 94 (pages 118-119):

93. People whose lives are barren and insecure seem to show a greater willingness to obey than people who are self-sufficient and self-confident. To the frustrated, freedom from responsibility is more attractive than freedom from restraint. They are eager to barter their independence for relief from the burdens of willing, deciding and being responsible for individual failure.  They willingly abdicate the directing of their lives to those who want to plan, command and shoulder all responsibility.  Moreover,  submission by all to a supreme leader is an approach to their ideal of equality.

In times of crisis, during floods, earthquakes, epidemics, depressions and wars, separate individual effort is of no avail, and people of every condition are ready to obey and follow a leader. To obey is then the only firm point in a chaotic day-by-day existence.

94. The frustrated are also as likely to be the most steadfast followers. It is remarkable, that, in a co-operative effort, the least self-reliant are the least likely to be discouraged by defeat.  For they join others in a common undertaking not so much to ensure the success of a cherished project as to avoid an individual shouldering of blame in case of failure. When the common undertaking fails, they are still spared the one thing they fear most, namely, the showing up of their individual shortcomings. Their faith remains unimpaired and they are eager to follow in a new attempt.

The frustrated follow a leader less because of their faith that he is leading them to a promised land than because of their immediate feeling that he is leading them away from their unwanted selves. Surrender to a leader is not a means to an end but a fulfillment. Whither they are led is of secondary importance.

(Note: Emphasis is mine.)

Hoffer offers up many more explanations. I'm sure I will be documenting more from his incredible work on the nature of mass movements as time comes and goes and Bush and his supporters continue to puzzle me.


10:33:06 PM   | COMMENT [] | TRACKBACK []

Blog banner taken from the oil painting "The Departure" (40"x 30") by Michael Parker, 1999.


November 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Oct   Dec

Click on one of the calendar days to read my journal posting for that day.

E-MAIL ME
Film Page

PREVIOUS POSTS


FAVORITE BLOGS
  

Archives

[Macro error: Can't call the script because the name "monthlyArchiveLinks" hasn't been defined.]
MUSIC REVIEWS

Mario Frangoulis
Sarah Brightman's 'Harem' Spectacular
Switchfoot: The Beautiful Letdown
The Reinvention of Madonna

NEWS
  Salon
  LiberalOasis
  New York Times
  Slate
  Tom Paine
  Mother Jones
  The Guardian
  CNN
  The Washington Post

  - Start your own blog
  Subscribe to this blog in   Radio:
Subscribe to "Michael Parker's Journal" in Radio UserLand.
Click to see the XML version of this web page.
Updated Salon Blogs

Salon Rankings


© Copyright 2005 Michael Parker. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 3/31/2005; 7:40:53 PM.
Powered by