Excerpt of The Departure by Michael Parker

  HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2004

In the introduction to his book War is a Force that Gives Us Meaning, Chris Hedges explains that when the Senate and House voted to give the president the right to 'use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks," there was only one dissenting vote. This vote was from Barbara J. Lee, a Democrat from California. In defense of her vote, she explained that military action could not guarantee security for the country and pleaded that "as we act, let us not become the evil we deplore."

As Donald Rumsfield flew into Iraq today to give what appeared to be nothing more than two very expensive press conferences at Abu Ghraib prison, he talked about the abuses being a "body blow" to the US and for those in charge. He also pinpointed the fact that no one had tried to keep these abuses secret. This can be argued.

Meanwhile, lawmakers were privileged to view additional photos and video of the abuses and torture at Abu Ghraib. Ken Guggenheim of the AP reported that "House and Senate members saw photos and video Wednesday of Iraqi corpses, military dogs menacing cowering Iraqi prisoners, Iraqi women forced to expose themselves and other sexual abuses. Some lawmakers said the pictures included forced homosexual sex..."

Guggenheim spoke with lawmakers about what they saw in the private screening. Here are a few comments:

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said, "It was significantly worse than anything that I had anticipated. Take the worst case and multiply it several times over." [snip]

"I saw cruel, sadistic torture," said Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., who added that some of the images were of male prisoners masturbating. She said she saw a man hitting himself against a wall as though to knock himself unconscious.

Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., said he did not see acts of violence, but what appeared to be "results of acts of violence."

He said he saw people in body bags and a person with a face "virtually gone." He saw "people being stitched up above the eyebrow apparently unconscious."

Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y., said, "There were people who were forced to have sex with each other."

Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., said, "There were some pictures where it looked like a prisoner was sodomizing himself" with an object. He said blood was visible in the photograph.

Maureen Dowd believes that President Bush has his very own sex scandal on his hands because of this. In her New York Times article "Clash of Civilizations," printed today, she writes:

The administration's demented quest to conquer Arab hearts and minds has dissolved in a torrent of pornography denigrating other parts of the Arab anatomy. George Bush, who swept into office on a cloud of moral umbrage, now has his own sex scandal - one with far greater implications than titillating cigar jokes.

The Bush hawks, so fixated on making the Middle East look more like America, have made America look un-American. Should we really be reduced to defending ourselves by saying at least we don't behead people?

Gripped in a "I can't look at them - I've got to look at them" state of mind, lawmakers grimly filed into private screening rooms on the Hill to check out the 1,800 grotesque images of sex, humiliation and torture.

"They're disgusting," Senator Dianne Feinstein told me. "If somebody wanted to plan a clash of civilizations, this is how they'd do it. These pictures play into every stereotype of America that Arabs have: America as debauched, America as hypocrites.

"Cheney and Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz act like they know all the answers, almost like a divine right," she said. "They don't have a divine right, and they are wrong."

House Majority Leader Tom Delay explained today that people are overreacting to these images and using it as a political tool. When we are at war, when we are the occupying force, and especially when we have promised freedom from tyranny and abuse, this is not overreacting. We are seeing the acts of evil that we deplore.


11:03:42 PM   | COMMENT [] | TRACKBACK []

You don't truly know yourself until you know and recognize what others think of you. One of the questions that has plagued America since 9/11 is "Why do they hate us?"

Over the last nine months, I've tried defining the reasons, but that is not what I want to highlight with this post. I received an email from a reader from the Dominican Republic today in response to my posts on Nick Berg. I appreciated her email because it shines a sliver of light on the question asked above.

Today I (unfortunately) saw that video were the people from Irak decapitated the poor American. I have to say that that was one of the most shocking things I've seen in my life. I was so shocked I even started to cry.

A teacher once told me that if a person, as a young adult, doesn't hate the USA for a period of time, then they have no heart. That teacher was from New York, and was one of the most loyal-to-his-country person I know.

I've always felt that the USA handled things very badly sometimes, but I never had felt so strongly about it like today.

You must be wondering why I feel this way, given the fact that the one killed was American, and that the murderers were others. Well, not only are Americans doing things as bad or even worse than that, but they (you) are making it public. It's history repeating. It's like that time in Cuba, were the newspapers was sensationalist. I mean, let's be honest. The USA controls the world. Why would they allow that video to spread all over the internet so anyone could see it? Not only I find it a disrespect to that poor fellow American that died, but I think that it is a sick way of twisting the truth. Of course, Bush and the other animals that rule your great nation only want everyone to hate those people. The reason exactly why they don't show the other side of the coin--how THEY treat the people in Irak.

Sadly my country is (as I like to think about it) the unofficial US colony. Our governors do whatever your people tell us to do. The reason why we send troops to Irak. Why in the world would a country full of people dying of hunger would want to send troops for a matter that doesn't really concern them? We just want to be in the US' good list.

About my point that the US always manipulates the media, why did they publicly announce that those people were paying a reward for Kofi Annan? My guess is to make someone else do what they want to do. The US has never respected the United Nations. Your narcissistic approach to everything made you have confrontations with the UN, so what a better way get rid of that problem than to kill it's leader... and blame another person! Shame on you (them).  


9:41:55 PM   | COMMENT [] | TRACKBACK []

Blog banner taken from the oil painting "The Departure" (40"x 30") by Michael Parker, 1999.


May 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Apr   Jun

Click on one of the calendar days to read my journal posting for that day.

E-MAIL ME
Film Page

PREVIOUS POSTS


FAVORITE BLOGS
  

Archives

[Macro error: Can't call the script because the name "monthlyArchiveLinks" hasn't been defined.]
MUSIC REVIEWS

Mario Frangoulis
Sarah Brightman's 'Harem' Spectacular
Switchfoot: The Beautiful Letdown
The Reinvention of Madonna

NEWS
  Salon
  LiberalOasis
  New York Times
  Slate
  Tom Paine
  Mother Jones
  The Guardian
  CNN
  The Washington Post

  - Start your own blog
  Subscribe to this blog in   Radio:
Subscribe to "Michael Parker's Journal" in Radio UserLand.
Click to see the XML version of this web page.
Updated Salon Blogs

Salon Rankings


© Copyright 2005 Michael Parker. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 3/31/2005; 10:42:41 PM.
Powered by