Excerpt of The Departure by Michael Parker

  HOME

Saturday, May 15, 2004

Yes, Mr. Rumsfield, you are accountable for what has transpired at Abu Ghraib.  Here is the latest on a little secret operation the intelligence community liked to call Copper Green, from Seymour Hersh's New Yorker article titled "The Gray Zone." 

The roots of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal lie not in the criminal inclinations of a few Army reservists but in a decision, approved last year by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, to expand a highly secret operation, which had been focussed on the hunt for Al Qaeda, to the interrogation of prisoners in Iraq. Rumsfeld’s decision embittered the American intelligence community, damaged the effectiveness of élite combat units, and hurt America’s prospects in the war on terror.

According to interviews with several past and present American intelligence officials, the Pentagon’s operation, known inside the intelligence community by several code words, including Copper Green, encouraged physical coercion and sexual humiliation of Iraqi prisoners in an effort to generate more intelligence about the growing insurgency in Iraq. A senior C.I.A. official, in confirming the details of this account last week, said that the operation stemmed from Rumsfeld’s long-standing desire to wrest control of America’s clandestine and paramilitary operations from the C.I.A.

-- Atrios at Eschaton posted the link to this article.


5:16:04 PM   | COMMENT [] | TRACKBACK []

This is the question posed by the Chilean author Ariel Dorfman, in the masterfully written article "Are there times when we have to accept torture?" published by The Guardian on May 8th. I highly recommend you read the article in its entirety.  To give you a taste of his prose and his thoughtful analysis on this matter, I give you these few paragraphs:

It is a question that was most unforgettably put forward over 130 years ago by Fyodor Dostoevsky in The Brothers Karamazov. In that novel, the saintly Alyosha Karamazov is tempted by his brother Ivan, confronted with an unbearable choice. Let us suppose, Ivan says, that in order to bring men eternal happiness, it was essential and inevitable to torture to death one tiny creature, only one small child. Would you consent? [snip]

Make no mistake: every regime that tortures does so in the name of salvation, some superior goal, some promise of paradise. Call it communism, call it the free market, call it the free world, call it the national interest, call it fascism, call it the leader, call it civilisation, call it the service of God, call it the need for information; call it what you will, the cost of paradise, the promise of some sort of paradise, Ivan Karamazov continues to whisper to us, will always be hell for at least one person somewhere, sometime. [snip]

Alyosha knows, as we should, that torture does not, therefore, only corrupt those directly involved in the terrible contact between two bodies, one that has all the power and the other that has all the pain, one that can do what it wants and the other that cannot do anything except wait and pray and resist. Torture also corrupts the whole social fabric because it prescribes a silencing of what has been happening between those two bodies; it forces people to make believe that nothing, in fact, has been happening; it necessitates that we lie to ourselves about what is being done not that far, after all, from where we talk, while we munch chocolate, smile at a lover, read a book, listen to a concerto, exercise in the morning. Torture obliges us to be deaf and blind and mute - and that is what Alyosha cannot consent to.


11:38:24 AM   | COMMENT [] | TRACKBACK []

TomPaine.com printed a letter that was sent to President Bush this week in regards to the abuses at Abu Ghraib.  It confirms a fact that abuses were being reported to the proper people and reported in newspapers but no one was raising the alarm or doing anything about it. In light of Rumsfield's visit to the prison, which didn't win many points because of his offensive remark "I'm a survivor," and the news some of the interogation tactics will be done away with, the recommendations by these humanitarian groups can be used as a good measure on the steps taken to resolve these abuses.  Here is the content of that letter:

Dear Mr. President:

We are deeply disturbed by the photos of the treatment of prisoners by U.S. soldiers and interrogators and welcome your public condemnation of those acts. But more than statements are required. We write to urge you to take decisive and immediate action to address a problem that we believe is not an isolated incident, but rather illustrates a dangerous and illegal system of interrogation and detention in use by the United States in many places around the world. As representatives of a number of major human rights organizations, we request a meeting with you on an urgent basis to discuss our recommendations for dealing with this problem.

For the past year and a half, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, USA Today, Newsday, The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, The Christian Science Monitor and other leading newspapers have repeatedly quoted unnamed U.S. intelligence officials boasting about the use of torture and other ill treatment of prisoners. Numerous detainees have been killed or attempted suicide in custody in Afghanistan, Iraq and Guantanamo Bay, prompting unprecedented expressions of concern by the International Committee of the Red Cross; suspects have been turned over to the foreign intelligence services of countries, such as Syria, with records of brutal torture; the ICRC has also specifically expressed concern about conditions at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq; and now, the U.S. military's own inquiry has found "systemic and illegal abuse of detainees" at Abu Ghraib.

These incidents occurred across continents and over many months, but they are nevertheless linked. As Cofer Black, the head of the CIA's Counterterrorism Center, told Congress in September 2002: "There was a before 9/11, and there was an after 9/11 .... After 9/11 the gloves come off." Since then, intelligence officials have said repeatedly that they have a mandate to obtain information by "breaking" prisoners through a combination of pain and humiliation, if not outright torture. The sexual humiliation of prisoners now documented at Abu Ghraib was extreme, but not new. More than a year ago, The New York Times quoted prisoners held in Afghanistan saying that they were kept naked most of the time. Likewise, there have been numerous reports of female guards and interrogators used in a deliberate attempt to humiliate and degrade prisoners.

For more than a year, the undersigned organizations and others have repeatedly asked you and senior officials in your administration to act promptly and forcefully to publicly repudiate the statements of intelligence officials and to assure that the treatment of detainees is consistent with international humanitarian law. We particularly asked that you provide access to detention centers, release the results of investigations and take other steps to ensure greater transparency of the detention process.

Last June, human rights groups welcomed your pledge that the United States would lead by example in the fight against torture. Yet whatever steps your administration may have taken to implement that pledge have been inadequate to end torture and inhuman treatment of prisoners and to dispel the apparent belief among U.S. interrogators and guards that brutality and degradation are acceptable in the quest for information. The events at Abu Ghraib now in the headlines are the latest evidence of an interrogation and detention system that appears to be out of control and of inadequate action to match your pledges, not the isolated misdeeds of a few individuals allegedly acting without authorization.

This pattern of conduct has caused extraordinary damage to the cause of human rights around the world, as well as to the United States and to its ability to conduct foreign policy successfully, from Iraq to the global campaign against terrorism.

Extraordinary action on your part is now required to begin to repair this damage and, at long last, bring an end to this pattern of torture and cruel treatment. You have stated in eloquent terms that "human dignity is non-negotiable," but you have tolerated a U.S. system of interrogation that is specifically designed to degrade, humiliate and destroy the human dignity of prisoners to obtain information. In recent days, U.S. officials in Iraq have announced a welcome prohibition on the use of a number of "stress" interrogation tactics. You should follow through on these announcements by completely banning the use of the "stress and duress" tactics and incommunicado detention throughout the world.

The choice is not about whether to express your abhorrence over the events at Abu Ghraib and to investigate them. The choice is whether you dismiss them as the actions of "a few bad apples" while continuing an interrogation and detention system that is cruel and illegal; or act forcefully to end the "stress and duress" system of incommunicado interrogation in Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantanamo Bay or anywhere that people are held in U.S. custody. This system violates both the Constitution and international law, including the solemn pledges your father made when he sought Senate approval of the Convention Against Torture.

We ask you to take immediate actions to establish clear prohibitions on illegal and inappropriate interrogation and detention methods backed by strong penalties; mandate strong enforcement mechanisms, including access for independent monitors; and provide for public review and full disclosure of interrogation practices and the records of investigations. Our specific recommendations for accomplishing these goals are attached.

We appreciate your interest in our concerns and your consideration of our recommendations. We hope that we will be able to arrange a meeting with you as soon as possible.

Recommendations

1. Immediately ban "stress and duress" interrogation and take immediate action to insure that all interrogation and detention practices are fully consistent with international human rights and humanitarian law.

2. Immediately ban any action taken anywhere in the world that would violate the prohibition on "cruel and unusual" punishment if conducted in the United States; this is the pledge that your administration made to the Congress in June 2003 that was apparently never implemented.

3. Immediately ban secret and incommunicado detention; specifically, mandate that the names of all detainees be published.

4. Immediately ban the transfer of prisoners to countries with a pattern of using torture in interrogation;

5. Immediately ban the use of civilian contractors in conducting interrogations;

6. Ensure that appropriate criminal penalties exist for any person involved in torturing or otherwise abusing detainees-no matter where in the world the conduct occurs.

7. Mandate Strong Enforcement

8. Permit immediate access to every prisoner to independent monitors, including the ICRC, appropriate UN officials and human rights organizations, including the ability to interview prisoners in private, and conduct medical evaluations in accordance with the Manual on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment;

9. Permit all detainees to have access to family members and physicians, based on a recognition that secret and incommunicado detention is at the root of much of the prisoner abuse;

10. Ensure that there is a record available to determine whether any abuses occurred by videotaping all interrogations and other interaction by military and intelligence personnel with detainees;

11. Request significant increases in funding for the Inspector General offices in every agency involved in any form of interrogation or detention of prisoners, and issue an explicit mandate to each such office to monitor interrogations and detention;

12. Pay restitution. Follow the lead of the United Kingdom in its response to findings of prisoner abuse in Northern Ireland prior to 1972, by providing redress and compensation, including paying restitution to those detainees found to have been victims of torture or inhumane treatment.

13. Provide Public Review and Full Disclosure

14. Release the results of investigation into the abuse of detainees, including the Department of Defense investigation into deaths at Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan in December, 2002, and investigations concerning interrogation and detention methods and procedures.

15. Work with the Congress to appoint an investigation commission of persons of unquestioned integrity and independence to examine all aspects of U.S. interrogation practices, including the transfer of detainees to other countries; and

16. Disclose publicly all interrogation manuals, instructions and guidance governing the conduct of detention and interrogation.

Sincerely,

William Schulz, Amnesty International USA; Gay McDougall, Global Rights; Michael Posner, Human Rights First; Ken Roth, Human Rights Watch; Louise Kantrow, International League for Human Rights; Felice D. Gaer, Jacob Blaustein Institute for the Advancement of Human Rights; Robin Phillips, Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights; Len Rubenstein, Physicians for Human Rights USA; Todd Howland, RFK Memorial Center for Human Rights


11:17:22 AM   | COMMENT [] | TRACKBACK []

Now this is absurd. A Catholic Bishop has declared that voters who support or vote for politicians who support abortion or gay marriage should not take communion. This is an example of religion playing politics, focusing on Democrats who generally support these rights.  Disgusting power playing by religious leaders such as this will further polarize the body of believers who come to worship. By refusing believers who are diverse and who believe in human rights, they are teaching the gospel of exclusiveness. The age of enlightenment is dying.   
10:51:02 AM   | COMMENT [] | TRACKBACK []

Blog banner taken from the oil painting "The Departure" (40"x 30") by Michael Parker, 1999.


May 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Apr   Jun

Click on one of the calendar days to read my journal posting for that day.

E-MAIL ME
Film Page

PREVIOUS POSTS


FAVORITE BLOGS
  

Archives

[Macro error: Can't call the script because the name "monthlyArchiveLinks" hasn't been defined.]
MUSIC REVIEWS

Mario Frangoulis
Sarah Brightman's 'Harem' Spectacular
Switchfoot: The Beautiful Letdown
The Reinvention of Madonna

NEWS
  Salon
  LiberalOasis
  New York Times
  Slate
  Tom Paine
  Mother Jones
  The Guardian
  CNN
  The Washington Post

  - Start your own blog
  Subscribe to this blog in   Radio:
Subscribe to "Michael Parker's Journal" in Radio UserLand.
Click to see the XML version of this web page.
Updated Salon Blogs

Salon Rankings


© Copyright 2005 Michael Parker. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 3/31/2005; 10:44:53 PM.
Powered by