Allen L Roland's Radio Weblog
My ongoing theme is always the truth , as I see it , and the exposure of lies, deception and manipulation wherever they exist. I remain firmly convinced that the world can no longer resist its innate urge to unite and co-operate with one another and we are very close to the point where war can no longer be an option if this transformation is to occur. Website: allenroland.com Email: allen@allenroland.com
Last updated:
7/1/2005; 11:12:44 PM


June 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    
May   Jul



Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Allen L Roland's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Allen L Roland:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

WEBLOG ARCHIVE

2005/07

2005/062005/052005/042005/032005/022005/012004/122004/112004/102004/092004/082004/072004/062004/052004/042004/032004/022004/012003/122003/112003/102003/092003/082003/072003/062003/052003/042003/03

 7/1/05
 6/30/05
 6/30/05
 6/29/05
 6/29/05
 6/28/05
 6/28/05
 6/27/05
 6/27/05
 6/26/05
 6/25/05
 6/24/05
 6/23/05
 6/22/05
 6/21/05
 6/20/05
 6/20/05
 6/19/05
 6/18/05
 6/17/05
 6/16/05
 6/16/05
 6/15/05
 6/15/05
 6/14/05
 6/13/05

 

Friday, June 03, 2005

Republicans See Anti-Bush Agenda in All Lucas Films


President George W. Bush is unhappy about a percieved anti-Republican/ anti- Bush bias of all of the films of George Lucas.


The recent release of “Star Wars; Revenge of the Sith” has been met with much protest by Republicans who see this as an attack on President Bush and the war in Iraq. In an interview conducted yesterday by 60 Minutes correspondent Mike Wallace, President Bush surprised the reporter by stretching these allegations to cover the entire Star Wars pantheon of films. Excerpts from that interview are quoted here. All “Bush-isms” have been left in place rather than provide grammatical accuracy.


(After the preliminary exchange of pleasantries and greeting,  
 Mike Wallace went straight to the questions.)

Wallace: Mr. President, how do you feel about the recent  
reports that the new Star Wars film, produced and written by George Lucas, opposes the war in Iraq and your presidency? Some Republicans feel you
are likened by Lucas to both the Emperor and Darth Vader.

Bush: I’m upset about these reports.

Wallace: I thought you would be. As an investigative reporter, I thought that the stories and accusations were a little far reaching and ridiculous.

Bush: You misunderstanded me, Mike. I don’t think the reports dug deep enough. I’ve had my Chief of Staff looking into all of  
the Star Wars films and we think that George Lucas has always been oppositioned to this administration.

Wallace: Always? I believe that Star Wars was released in mid-70’s. Your father was not even the vice president at that time.  
Your daughters were not even born. Most Americans could not have found Iraq on a map. How can that film be opposed to your presidency and the Iraq war? Can you give us an example from, say, the first movie?

Bush: This film is actually the worstest one of the bunch. First  
off, let’s look at the subtitle. They call it “A New Hope.” That’s the new name they say they gave Star Wars when they started  
making sequels, but we discovered the real truth. Now, we all know that President Clinton was born and raised in Hope, Arkansas. I can remember that because we used to call him  
“The Dope from Hope.” I think that this title is a reference to  
 former Vice President Gore, my opponent in my first election, being the new hope, or the new Clinton.

Wallace: Really, Mr. President, isn’t that stretching it just a little?

Bush: If it was just that title and just that one film, I would not be upset. That isn’t all we found wrong with that movie. Remember the big shaggy guy Chewbacca? The robots were told in a funny board game to “let the Wookie win.” Remember the Vice President’s beard? Was I also supposed to give up in Florida and let the fuzzy guy steal the election from me? What about the dessert planet that the robots crash on? They are taken into slavery and moved through the dessert in big, giant tanks. Then, on the same planet, the good guys are attacked by Sand People  
in robes. It’s all references to the Iraqi dessert. Luke, the good  
guy who represents the honest, hard working, American middle class, has to be saved by a bearded Obi Wan Kenobi. Kenobi  
and Kerry both start with “K-E.” Kenobi has a beard like Gore. Lucas is trying to send a message that the Democratic party is  
the one that will save the people from the war in the dessert.  
Look at the little robot they have in that movie. R2D2 is a subtle hint to vote for the opposition. There are two R’s in Gore/Leiberman and none in Bush/Cheney. There are also two  
D’s in Kerry/Edwards and none in Bush/Cheney. This little robot is always saving the day, trying to make people think that if they voted for my opponents, they would be saving the day.

Wallace: I see…. Well, what could you possibly find wrong in the next film. I believe the title was “The Empire Strikes Back.” This movie starts out on an ice planet, moves to a jungle planet, and ends up in a cloud city. What can this possibly have to do with a war in the dessert?

Bush: Lucas uses the title in a subtle way on this one. Remember when I ran the Texas Rangers baseball team? The term “strike” is supposed to be a reference to me. He also must think that I am trying to build an American Empire. He also is pulling up the old accusational that the Iraqi war is just me striking back at Sadaam for his threats against my father. I think that you can see this in the scene where Darth Vader reveals that he is Luke’s father. He wants the American people to join him in his evil ways, insinuationing that I have joined my father in his ways by being the second Bush to begin a war in the middle east. The resistance, or freedom fighters, are attacked on the ice planet by the “Empire.” This is another slap in my face for fighting against the Iraqis who are killing our innocent troops over there.

Wallace: Mr. President, do you really believe this drivel?

Bush: You’ve got the wrong sport, Mike. Drivel is what you do in basketball and I am talking about baseball here.

Wallace: Uh huh, …. that is an … interesting way of looking at things. The last movie of the original trilogy was “Return of the Jedi.” What do you and your researchers find wrong in that 80’s movie that was released when your father was Vice President?

Bush: Is that the one with the little Teddy Bear guys?

Wallace: They were called “Ewoks.”

Bush: Whatever. This is the movie where we find out that the Princess is really Luke’s sister, even though he had been chasing after her for the past few movies. Lucas is using this incest insinuation as a personal attack by trying to say that I am inbred. When the cute little Teddy Bear guys make the gold robot their God, they are trying to say that we want the unsophisticated people of the Middle East to worship our technology. When those little guys attack the empire with their sticks and rocks, they are also trying to demonstrate the brute force that we are using against a simple people who do not need rescuing. The wicked and evil emperor is supposed to represent me. The lightening he shoots from his fingers is supposed to represent the way I send my power and people all over the globe.

Wallace: Okay…. I see you’ve really “thought” that one out. After an almost twenty year hiatus, George Lucas released a new Star Wars movie with “The Phantom Menace.” Having listened to your other creative comments, I suppose that you have more to add for this movie?

Bush: I do. One of the characters in the movie has the last name of “Gin.” I think this is supposed to be a referencal to my supposed drinking problems when I was younger and maybe the exaggerated partying problems of my daughters. Also, this movie has a teenager as a queen. I think that this supposed to show a young, immature, inexperienced leader at wartime. Some people think  
that I am too young or inexperienced for this job.

Wallace: Do you also think that Jar Jar Binks, a bumbling, stupid fool who
is always getting lucky, and is the most universally hated character in the whole series, is supposed to symbolize you?

Bush: Why do you think Jar Jar is stupid? I like that funny character; he’s
one of my favorites.
 
 
At this point Mike Wallace sighs and cuts the interview.
 
 Courtesy of spoof.com / Written by Jalapenoman


 

Allen Roland’s weblog: http://blogs.salon.com/0002255/
Website: www.allenroland.com
ONLY THE TRUTH IS REVOLUTIONARY


10:56:55 PM    comment []

 

CONDI RICE'S CREDIBILITY GAP / A REVIEW

Here is a point-by-point analysis of how America's Secretary of State  has a severe and long standing problem with the truth ~ before we even discuss her current credibility gap as spokesperson for the Cheney/Bush doctrine of rationalized dishonesty.

Allen L Roland

 

Center for American Progress   3/26/04 
 Pre-9/11 Intelligence

  • CLAIM: "I don't think anybody could have predicted that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile." – National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 5/16/02  
  •  FACT: On August 6, 2001, the President personally "received a one-and-a-half page briefing advising him that Osama bin Laden was capable of a major strike against the US, and that the plot could include the hijacking of an American airplane." In July 2001, the Administration was also told that terrorists had explored using airplanes as missiles. [Source: NBC, 9/10/02; LA Times, 9/27/01]
  • CLAIM: In May 2002, Rice held a press conference to defend the Administration from new revelations that the President had been explicitly warned about an al Qaeda threat to airlines in August 2001. She "suggested that Bush had requested the briefing because of his keen concern about elevated terrorist threat levels that summer." [Source: Washington Post, 3/25/04]
  • FACT: According to the CIA, the briefing "was not requested by President Bush." As commissioner Richard Ben-Veniste disclosed, "the CIA informed the panel that the author of the briefing does not recall such a request from Bush and that the idea to compile the briefing came from within the CIA." [Source: Washington Post, 3/25/04]
  • CLAIM: "In June and July when the threat spikes were so high…we were at battle stations." – National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/22/04
  • FACT: "Documents indicate that before Sept. 11, Ashcroft did not give terrorism top billing in his strategic plans for the Justice Department, which includes the FBI. A draft of Ashcroft's 'Strategic Plan' from Aug. 9, 2001, does not put fighting terrorism as one of the department's seven goals, ranking it as a sub-goal beneath gun violence and drugs. By contrast, in April 2000, Ashcroft's predecessor, Janet Reno, called terrorism 'the most challenging threat in the criminal justice area.'" Meanwhile, the Bush Administration decided to terminate "a highly classified program to monitor Al Qaeda suspects in the United States." [Source: Washington Post, 3/22/04; Newsweek, 3/21/04]
  • CLAIM: "The fact of the matter is [that] the administration focused on this before 9/11." – National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/22/04
  • FACT: President Bush and Vice President Cheney's counterterrorism task force, which was created in May, never convened one single meeting. The President himself admitted that "I didn't feel the sense of urgency" about terrorism before 9/11. [Source: Washington Post, 1/20/02; Bob Woodward's "Bush at War"]
  • CLAIM: "Our [pre-9/11 NSPD] plan called for military options to attack al Qaeda and Taliban leadership, ground forces and other targets -- taking the fight to the enemy where he lived." – National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/22/04
  • FACT:  9/11 Commissioner Gorelick: "There is nothing in the NSPD that came out that we could find that had an invasion plan, a military plan." Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage: "Right." Gorelick: "Is it true, as Dr. Rice said, 'Our plan called for military options to attack Al Qaida and Taliban leadership'?" Armitage: "No, I think that was amended after the horror of 9/11." [Source: 9/11 Commission testimony, 3/24/04]

Condi Rice on Pre-9/11 Counterterrorism Funding

  • CLAIM: "The president increased counterterrorism funding several-fold" before 9/11. – National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/24/04
  • FACT: According to internal government documents, the first full Bush budget for FY2003 "did not endorse F.B.I. requests for $58 million for 149 new counterterrorism field agents, 200 intelligence analysts and 54 additional translators" and "proposed a $65 million cut for the program that gives state and local counterterrorism grants." Newsweek noted the Administration "vetoed a request to divert $800 million from missile defense into counterterrorism." [Source: New York Times, 2/28/04; Newsweek, 5/27/02]

Richard Clarke's Concerns

  • CLAIM: "Richard Clarke had plenty of opportunities to tell us in the administration that he thought the war on terrorism was moving in the wrong direction and he chose not to." – National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/22/04
  • FACT: Clarke sent a memo to Rice principals on 1/24/01 marked "urgent" asking for a Cabinet-level meeting to deal with an impending al Qaeda attack. The White House acknowledges this, but says "principals did not need to have a formal meeting to discuss the threat." No meeting occurred until one week before 9/11. [Source: CBS 60 Minutes, 3/24/04; White House Press Release, 3/21/04
  • CLAIM: "No al Qaeda plan was turned over to the new administration." – National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/22/04
  • FACT: "On January 25th, 2001, Clarke forwarded his December 2000 strategy paper and a copy of his 1998 Delenda plan to the new national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice." – 9/11 Commission staff report, 3/24/04

Response to 9/11

  • CLAIM: "The president launched an aggressive response after 9/11." – National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/22/04
  • FACT: "In the early days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the Bush White House cut by nearly two-thirds an emergency request for counterterrorism funds by the FBI, an internal administration budget document shows. The papers show that Ashcroft ranked counterterrorism efforts as a lower priority than his predecessor did, and that he resisted FBI requests for more counterterrorism funding before and immediately after the attacks." [Source: Washington Post, 3/22/04]

9/11 and Iraq Invasion Plans

  • CLAIM: "Not a single National Security Council principal at that meeting recommended to the president going after Iraq. The president thought about it. The next day he told me Iraq is to the side." – National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/22/04
  • FACT: According to the Washington Post, "six days after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush signed a 2-and-a-half-page document marked 'TOP SECRET'" that "directed the Pentagon to begin planning military options for an invasion of Iraq." This is corroborated by a CBS News, which reported on 9/4/02 that five hours after the 9/11 attacks, "Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was telling his aides to come up with plans for striking Iraq." [Source: Washington Post, 1/12/03. CBS News, 9/4/02]

Iraq and WMD

  • CLAIM: "It's not as if anybody believes that Saddam Hussein was without weapons of mass destruction." – National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/18/04
  • FACT: The Bush Administration's top weapons inspector David Kay "resigned his post in January, saying he did not believe banned stockpiles existed before the invasion" and has urged the Bush Administration to "come clean" about misleading America about the WMD threat. [Source: Chicago Tribune, 3/24/04; UK Guardian, 3/3/04]

9/11-al Qaeda-Iraq Link

  • CLAIM: "The president returned to the White House and called me in and said, I've learned from George Tenet that there is no evidence of a link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11." – National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/22/04
  • FACT: If this is true, then why did the President and Vice President repeatedly claim Saddam Hussein was directly connected to 9/11? President Bush sent a letter to Congress on 3/19/03 saying that the Iraq war was permitted specifically under legislation that authorized force against "nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11." Similarly, Vice President Cheney said on 9/14/03 that "It is not surprising that people make that connection" between Iraq and the 9/11 attacks, and said "we don't know" if there is a connection. [Source: BBC, 9/14/03]  
The lies go on and they will only end when this administration is removed from office ~ either by election or impeachment.
 
Catch me  the first  Monday of each month at  
7AM and  4 PM  PST    
 TRUTHTALK
on Conscious Talk Radio with Brenda Michaels &  
 Rob Spears 
    LIVE webstream / www.conscioustalk.net  

 

Allen Roland’s weblog: http://blogs.salon.com/0002255/
Website: www.allenroland.com
ONLY THE TRUTH IS REVOLUTIONARY


1:56:59 PM    comment []



© Copyright 2005 Allen L Roland. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 7/1/2005; 11:12:46 PM.
Powered by