In an extraordinary intervention this week at the U.N ~ John Bolton has sought to roll back proposed UN commitments on aid to developing countries, combating global warming and nuclear disarmament.
Why is this a surprise to anyone ?
The Cheney/Bush Administration is interested only in dominance and certainly not democracy in all its dealings from Iraq to the U.N.
Of course, it is the U.K.'s Independent who reports this story which the American media has virtually ignored.
Allen L Roland
Scrap the ideals, Bolton tells UN
By David Usborne
ambassador to the United Nations is seeking to shred an agreement on
strengthening the world body and fighting poverty intended to be the highlight of a 60th anniversary summit next month.
In an extraordinary intervention, United States appointee John Bolton has sought to roll back proposed UN commitments on aid to developing countries, combating global warming and nuclear disarmament.
Ambassador Bolton has demanded no fewer than 750 amendments
to the blueprint restating the ideals of the international body,
originally drafted by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan.
The amendments are spelled out in a 32-page US version, littered
with deletions and exclusions. Most strikingly, the changes eliminate
all specific reference to the so-called Millennium Development Goals, accepted by all countries at the last major UN summit in 2000.
The Americans are also seeking to remove virtually all references to
the Kyoto Treaty and the battle against global warming.
They are striking out mention of the disputed International Criminal
Court and drawing a red line through any suggestion that the
nuclear powers should dismantle their arsenals.
Instead, they are seeking to add emphasis to passages on
fighting terrorism and spreading democracy.
Very quickly, Bolton has given the answer to anyone still wondering whether his long and difficult journey to New York - President
George W. Bush confirmed him to the post after the US Senate
was unable to - would render him coy or cautious.
He seems intent on taking the UN by the collar and saying plainly
to its face what America expects - and does not expect - from it.
To the dismay of many other delegations, the US has even gone
so far as to score out pledges in the text that would have asked
nations to "achieve the target of 0.7 per cent of gross national
product for official development assistance by no later than 2015".
Passages on a larger role for the General Assembly are gone.
A pledge to create a standing military capacity for UN peacekeeping
is rejected.
This show of contempt from Washington and its new envoy comes
when Annan has been severely weakened by allegations of
corruption, fraud and nepotism.
The White House is aware that Annan could be further undermined
when investigators into corruption in the oil-for-food programme in
Iraq issue their final report, probably just days before the summit,
due to run September 14-16.
The move by Bolton has thrown preparations for the summit into
turmoil, prompting some to question whether there will be anything
for leaders to put their pens to.
"We can't be entirely surely there will be an agreement," one senior
UN aide admitted yesterday.
Failure to reach an agreement could embarrass British Prime
Minister Tony Blair, who is believed to have given broad backing to Annan's original draft.
"It is not great news," said one Western diplomat about the US paper, which had been distributed only to a select group of UN ambassadors by yesterday. "What they are proposing is quite radical. If we start
negotiating now the way the Americans want, it is going to make for
a very difficult process."
The President of the General Assembly, Jean Ping of Gambia,
must now try to save the summit from disaster. He will bring together
a core group of 20-30 countries in the days ahead to see if the
American objections can be overcome.
Catch me on Monday, September 12th
7:30 AM and 4:30 PM PST
TRUTHTALK
on Conscious Talk Radio with Brenda Michaels &
Rob Spears
