Allen L Roland's Radio Weblog
My ongoing theme is always the truth , as I see it , and the exposure of lies, deception and manipulation wherever they exist. I remain firmly convinced that the world can no longer resist its innate urge to unite and co-operate with one another and we are very close to the point where war can no longer be an option if this transformation is to occur. Website: allenroland.com Email: allen@allenroland.com
Last updated:
11/18/2005; 7:17:28 PM


October 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Sep   Nov



Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Allen L Roland's Radio Weblog" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Allen L Roland:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

WEBLOG ARCHIVE

2005/11

2005/102005/092005/082005/072005/062005/052005/042005/032005/022005/012004/122004/112004/102004/092004/082004/072004/062004/052004/042004/032004/022004/012003/122003/112003/102003/092003/082003/072003/062003/052003/042003/03

 11/17/05
 11/17/05
 11/16/05
 11/16/05
 11/15/05
 11/14/05
 11/13/05
 11/12/05
 11/11/05
 11/10/05
 11/9/05
 11/8/05
 11/7/05
 11/6/05
 11/5/05
 11/4/05
 11/3/05
 11/2/05
 11/1/05
 11/1/05
 10/31/05
 10/29/05
 10/28/05
 10/27/05
 10/27/05
 10/26/05

 

Wednesday, October 12, 2005

 

OLIPHANT ON HARRIET MIERS

 
There is only one obvious reason Bush has seemingly betrayed his rabid right wing base with the appointment of his legal counsel , Harriet Miers ~ and that is for legal self protection when his soon to be announced abuses of power eventually make their way to the Supreme Court : Allen L Roland
 
 
 
 
Cartoon by Pat Oliphant / Wash Post 

 

Allen Roland’s weblog: http://blogs.salon.com/0002255/
Website: www.allenroland.com
ONLY THE TRUTH IS REVOLUTIONARY


9:27:34 PM    comment []

 

ON INTERVIEWING GEORGE W BUSH

Had I been fair? Should I just have been more deferential to George Bush? I felt that I had simply done my job and shuddered at the thought of the backlash I would surely have faced in Ireland had I not challenged the president on matters that had changed the way America was viewed around the world : Carole Coleman

In June 2004, Carole Coleman made world headlines when she interviewed President George Bush on live television, challenging him on the war in Iraq in a way that few journalists had done and, in the process, revealed how detached Bush was and still is from reality. 

If only our own media had the courage to challenge the President, as Carole did, on matters that have threatened the moral foundation of our Republic and Constitution .

Allen L Roland

 

TRYING TO INTERVIEW GEORGE BUSH 

http://www.theliffeypress.com/proddetail.php?prod=76-X&;cat=7

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-525-1817008-3049,00.html

CAROLE COLEMAN, TIMES UK - With just minutes to go to my interview with George W Bush, I was escorted to the White House library, where a staff member gave instructions on how to greet the president: "He'll be coming in the door behind you, just stand up, turn around and extend your hand." . . .

I stood up, turned around to face the door and seconds later the president strode towards me. Bush appeared shorter than on camera and he looked stern and rather grey that day.

"Thanks for comin', Mr President" I said, sticking out my hand. I had borrowed this greeting directly from him. When Bush made a speech at a rally or town hall, he always began by saying "Thanks for comin'" in his man-of-the-people manner. . .

Nobody said a word. "We don't address the president unless he speaks first," a member of the film crew had told me earlier. The resulting silence seemed odd and discomforting, so I broke it. "How has your day been, Mr President?" Without looking up at me, he continued to straighten his tie and replied in a strong Texan drawl, "Very busy."

This was followed by an even more disconcerting silence that, compounded by the six feet separating us, made it difficult to establish any rapport. . .

Mr President," I began. "You will arrive in Ireland in less than 24 hours' time. While our political leaders will welcome you, unfortunately the majority of our people will not. They are annoyed about the war in Iraq and about Abu Ghraib. Are you bothered by what Irish people think?"

The president was reclining in his seat and had a half-smile on his face, a smile I had often seen when he had to deal with something he would rather not.

"Listen. I hope the Irish people understand the great values of our country. And if they think that a few soldiers represent the entirety of America, they don't really understand America then . . . We are a compassionate country. We're a strong country, and we'll defend ourselves. But we help people. And we've helped the Irish and we'll continue to do so. We've got a good relationship with Ireland."

"And they are angry over Iraq as well and particularly the continuing death toll there," I added, moving him on to the war that had claimed 100 Iraqi lives that very day. He continued to smile, but just barely.

"Well, I can understand that. People don't like war. But what they should be angry about is the fact that there was a brutal dictator there that had destroyed lives and put them in mass graves and torture rooms . . . Look, Saddam Hussein had used weapons of mass destruction against his own people, against the neighborhood. He was a brutal dictator who posed a threat that the United Nations voted unanimously to say, Mr Saddam Hussein . . ."

"But, Mr President, you didn't find any weapons," I interjected.

"Let me finish, let me finish. May I finish?"

With his hand raised, he requested that I stop speaking. He paused and looked me straight in the eye to make sure I had got the message. He wanted to continue, so I backed off and he went on. "The United Nations said, 'Disarm or face serious consequences'. That's what the United Nations said. And guess what? He didn't disarm. He didn't disclose his arms. And therefore he faced serious consequences. But we have found a capacity for him to make a weapon. See, he had the capacity to make weapons . . ."

"But Mr President," I interrupted again, "the world is a more dangerous place today. I don't know whether you can see that or not."

"Why do you say that?"

"There are terrorist bombings every single day. It's now a daily event. It wasn't like that two years ago."

"What was it like on September 11 2001? It was a . . . there was relative calm, we . . ."

"But it's your response to Iraq that's considered . . ."

"Let me finish. Let me finish. Please. You ask the questions and I'll answer them, if you don't mind."

His hand was raised again as if to indicate that he was not going to tolerate this. Again, I felt I had no choice but to keep quiet. . .

Hands were signalling furiously now for me to end the interview.

"Mr President, thank you very much."

"You're welcome," he replied, still half-smiling and half-frowning.

It was over. I felt like a delinquent child who had been reprimanded by a stern, unwavering father. My face must have been the same color as my suit. Yet I also knew that we had discussed some important issues - probably more candidly than I had heard from President Bush in some time.

I was removing my microphone when he addressed me.

"Is that how you do it in Ireland - interrupting people all the time?"

I froze. He was not happy with me and was letting me know it.

"Yes," I stuttered, determined to maintain my own half-smile. . .

At the studio I handed over the tapes. My phone rang. It was MC, and her voice was cold.

"We just want to say how disappointed we are in the way you conducted the interview," she said.

"How is that?" I asked.

"You talked over the president, not letting him finish his answers."

"Oh, I was just moving him on," I said, explaining that I wanted some new insight from him, not two-year-old answers.

"He did give you plenty of new stuff."

She estimated that I had interrupted the president eight times and added that I had upset him. I was upset too, I told her. The line started to break up; I was in a basement with a bad phone signal. I took her number and agreed to call her back. I dialled the White House number and she was on the line again. . .

"You were more vicious than any of the White House press corps or even some of them up on Capitol Hill . . .The president leads the interview," she said.

"I don't agree," I replied, my initial worry now turning to frustration.

"It's the journalist's job to lead the interview.". . .

By the time I got to the control room, the Prime Time broadcast had just started. It was at the point of the first confrontation with the "leader of the free world" and those gathered around the monitors were glued to it. "Well done," someone said. "This is great." 

 "  Had I been fair? Should I just have been more deferential to George Bush? I felt that I had simply done my job and shuddered at the thought of the backlash I would surely have faced in Ireland had I not challenged the president on matters that had changed the way America was viewed around the world. " [Excerpted frm Alleluia America! by Carole Coleman] 

Catch me on  the first Monday of every month   
7 AM an 4PM  PST    
 TRUTHTALK
on Conscious Talk Radio with Brenda Michaels &  
 Rob Spears 

 

Allen Roland’s weblog: http://blogs.salon.com/0002255/
Website: www.allenroland.com
ONLY THE TRUTH IS REVOLUTIONARY


2:17:14 PM    comment []



© Copyright 2005 Allen L Roland. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 11/18/2005; 7:17:33 PM.
Powered by