|
OLBERMANN REFUTES BUSH AT GROUND ZERO
" Who has left this hole in the ground? We have not forgotten, Mr. President. You have."
Mirroring the thoughts of millions of Americans, including myself, who were outraged at George W Bush using his 9/11 speech last night to once again try to justify his illegal war, occupation and economic rape of Iraq ~ Keith Olbermann spoke from ground zero last night and rightfully reprimanded Bush for his shameless performance in the wake of 9/11.
Please watch this four minute video ( click on title ) and pass it on to all your friends ~
Allen L Roland
Olbermann: 'How dare you, Mr. President'
On the five-year anniversary of 9/11, Keith Olbermann gives another Murrow-esque soliloquy...
Click on title for four minute video
Some highlights:
"Five years later there is no memorial to the dead. Five years later there is no building rising to show with proud defiance that we would not have our America wrung from us, by cowards and criminals. Five years later this country's wound is still open. Five years later this country's mass grave is still unmarked. Five years later this is still just a background for a photo-op. It is beyond shameful....
Five years later, Mr. Bush, we are still fighting the terrorists on these streets. And look carefully, sir, on these 16 empty acres. The terrorists are clearly, still winning. And, in a crime against every victim here and every patriotic sentiment you mouthed but did not enact, you have done nothing about it.
History teaches us that nearly unanimous support of a government cannot be taken away from that government by its critics. It can only be squandered by those who use it not to heal a nation's wounds, but to take political advantage....
Terrorists did not come and steal our newly-regained sense of being American first, and political, fiftieth. Nor did the Democrats. Nor did the media. Nor did the people. The President -- and those around him -- did that.
They promised bi-partisanship, and then showed that to them, "bi-partisanship" meant that their party would rule and the rest would have to follow, or be branded, with ever-escalating hysteria, as morally or intellectually confused, as appeasers, as those who, in the Vice President's words yesterday, "validate the strategy of the terrorists."
They promised protection, and then showed that to them "protection" meant going to war against a despot whose hand they had once shaken, a despot who we now learn from our own Senate Intelligence Committee, hated al-Qaida as much as we did.
The polite phrase for how so many of us were duped into supporting a war, on the false premise that it had 'something to do' with 9/11 is "lying by implication." The impolite phrase is "impeachable offense."...
|
