|
THE FACE OF FAILURE / GEORGE W BUSH
" What me worry ? "
With a vacuous and well rehearsed stern face and tight lips, our very own Alfred E Newman launched his illegal war, occupation and oil grab of Iraq on March 19th, 2003 and five years, one million Iraqi deaths and atleast 4000 American 'reported deaths' later has insured his eventual place in American history as our worst president and biggest failure.
But there were many who rode the Cheney/Bush galloping war horse of hubris. Christopher Cerf and Victor S. Navasky of the L.A. Times have fun listing these so called experts ~ who were so wrong at that time .
" Our new study of the Iraq war, titled "Mission Accomplished! Or How We Won the War in Iraq," is a different matter. We can state without fear of contradiction that never before in the history of institute surveys has there been such a dramatic consensus among experts -- those who, by virtue of official status, academic standing, formal title, mastery of jargon and/or number of publications, are presumed to know what they are talking about. "
The complete article can be viewed at http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-navasky19mar19,0,4366886.story but here's an excerpt:
" They all seemed to agree that:
* The link between Iraq and the Al Qaeda terrorists who carried out the 9/11 attacks was (to quote New York Times columnist William Safire) an "undisputed fact."
* Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. ("Only a fool, or possibly a Frenchman, would think otherwise": Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen.)
* The cost of war would be cheap at the price. ( "We are dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction" ) : then-Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz.)
* The U.N.'s chief weapons inspector was unreliable. (Hans Blix "couldn't find the stretch marks on Rosie O'Donnell": Laura Ingraham, syndicated radio host.)
* Torture is justifiable. ("Reasonable people will disagree about when torture is justified": John C. Yoo, then-deputy assistant attorney general.)
* Abu Ghraib was not all that bad. (Abu Ghraib "is no different than what happens at the Skull and Bones initiation": Rush Limbaugh.)
* The U.S. won the war within weeks. ("The only people who think this wasn't a victory are Upper West Side liberals and a few people here in Washington": Charles Krauthammer, syndicated columnist.)
Although there were differences, the Great Consensus was bipartisan. Sen. John McCain (who said before the fact that "the Iraqi people will greet us as liberators") observed in September 2003 that "the next three to six months are critical."
Three months later, Sen. Hillary Clinton (who before the invasion had said that Hussein "will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons") insisted that "the next six to seven months are critical."
Barack Obama partisans may try to argue that the Illinois senator did not share in the consensus, but he lacked any foreign policy experience and therefore does not qualify as an expert and is excluded from our study.
Nevertheless, as scrupulous scholars, we concede that there was and is a small group of dissenters from the Great Consensus, but they are for the most part ordinary citizens or extreme left- (and far right-) wingers who don't really count. Besides, they would only pollute our sample.
Finally, although the institute expresses no opinion of its own on the matter, we feel it is incumbent on us to note apropos the "surge" that there is ample precedent for the "turning point" thesis mentioned above:
* July 7, 2003: "This month will be a political turning point for Iraq." (Douglas J. Feith, then-undersecretary for Defense.)
Allen L Roland http://blogs.salon.com/0002255/2008/03/24.html
Allen L Roland is a practicing psychotherapist, author and lecturer who also shares a daily political and social commentary on his weblog and website allenroland.com He also guest hosts a monthly national radio show TRUTHTALK on www.conscioustalk.net
|
