"Ah, you come from one of those Americas. You have my sympathy." - Neil Gaiman  
Last updated:
6/17/05; 8:32:49 AM


July 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Jun   Aug




Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Patriotically Incorrect" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Patriotically Incorrect:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Tuesday, July 29, 2003

Winning Coalitions

Well folks, clearly I've been more than lax about updating my blog this July. The summer can be a really busy time for me. But I have had a few thoughts of late that I would like to share.

Today, I'd like to address the debate over the DLC notion that votes gained in the center are more valuable than votes gained on the left. Their argument follows a simple logic: a vote gained on the left gives you one vote, while a vote gained in the center gives you a vote while depriving your opponent of a vote.

Usually, the arguments against this strategy are emotional and ideological, equating it with prostituting principles for votes. But you don't need to head down this divisive road at all to see the flaws in the logic of the strategy.

What the go-for-the-center strategy ignores is the fact that people on the margins don't have to vote. As the Democrats move to the right, every "double" vote they gain at the Republicans' expense can be neutralized by the loss of a vote on the left (whether by way of disillusioned apathy or by way of defection to the Greens).

Furthermore, as the Democrats move away from their base to graze where the grass looks greener, they marginalize the most enthusiasitc portion of their constituency. Who is going to do the organizing when the only voters they seem to value are swing voters? The definition of a swing vote is that it can swing. It makes for some very unstable ground on which to build the future of a party.

Finally, if we take a look through the looking glass, the Republicans have proven by example that you can strengthen your party by nurturing your base.

Now I'm not arguing here that the Dems should radicalize. They can't win an election while alienating the center any more than they can while alienating their base. That part of the DLC argument is sound. The fly in the ointment is the presumption of mutual exclusivity.

The Republicans have proven that a party can stitch together a fairly solid winning coalition of ideological and swing voters. How the Dems can do the same is the $64,000 question. Clearly I don't have all the answers, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't begin by alienating their base.


8:23:46 PM    Put your John Hancock right here! []




© Copyright 2005 Patriotically Incorrect. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 6/17/05; 8:32:49 AM.
Powered by