If you consider the Bush administration a success, then how do you define failure?  
Last updated:
6/14/04; 9:55:03 AM


November 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Oct   Dec




Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Patriotically Incorrect" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Patriotically Incorrect:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Thursday, November 13, 2003

Judicial Reactionism

The Republicans' "reverse filibuster" is underway right now. I'll let others critique their parliamentary tactics and hypocrisy in light of their history of judicial stonewalling. I've got some thoughts about some of their rhetorical tactics.

The Republicans have found a new toy to play with. It's a particular family of words such as "racist" "bigot" and "hate speech" which, since the days when many Dixiecrats defected across the aisle, have more often than not applied more accurately to themselves.

Republicans use these words against Democratic lawmakers every time they refuse to confirm some hateful right-wing creep who is black or hispanic or even Catholic. They accuse Democrats of trying to prop up a facade of ideological homogeneity for minority groups.

Their outrage might stem from a violent cognitive dissonance when Democrats don't live up to Republicans' cartoonish view of them enshrining minority advancement as the greatest possible good, trumping in all cases any good sense. I suspect that on some level, many Republicans truly believe that dark skin should be sufficient to get a free pass from Democrats into the court system regardless of ideology or competence.

Bush calls policies which give minorities with fewer opportunities a leg up "the soft bigotry of lowered expectations." Of course it would be the worst kind of "soft bigotry" to confirm, just because of their skin color or heritage or religion, individuals who are fundamentally opposed to the best interests of the nation: "Well, if you were a white Anglo Saxon protestant and espoused that tortured interpretation of the Constitution, I'd roundly denounce you, but since you're black, let me be the first to say 'Welcome to the bench, your honor.'" But that's exactly what the Republicans claim is the Democrats' M.O. How dare they not live up to it when it serves the Republicans' purposes?

Of course as an added bonus, throwing around silly and frivolous accusations of bigotry also serves the purpose of diluting the seriousness of the charge altogether, weakening the blow the next time it is turned back on them.
11:43:29 AM    Put your John Hancock right here! 




© Copyright 2004 Patriotically Incorrect. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 6/14/04; 9:55:04 AM.
Powered by